The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Easy dna kit

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

The Easy-DNA kit is a laboratory product designed for the extraction and purification of DNA from a variety of sample types. It provides a simple and efficient method to isolate high-quality DNA, which can then be used in various downstream applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

84 protocols using easy dna kit

1

Wheat DNA Extraction and Fungal Genotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 50-mg aliquot of a 100-g ground wheat sample was transferred to a microtube with a 3-mm steel pearl and shaken for 3 min (50 rpm) on a TissueLyser LT (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherland). Next, DNA was extracted using the Easy-DNA kit (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer instructions. Fungal isolates with defined trichothecene genotypes were cultured in YES agar medium for 5 days at 25°C and used for the construction of efficiency and standard curves. Mycelia were scrapped from the medium and DNA was extracted using the Easy-DNA kit (Invitrogen) according to manufacturer instructions. Fungal and wheat DNA concentrations were determined in a Nanodrop 2000 UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Phase assay of thefimSinvertible element offimoperon.

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fimS phase assays were performed similarly as described previously (84 (link)). KqPF9 and TOP52 isolates were grown overnight at 37°C in static conditions and harvested by centrifugation, and their genomic DNA was extracted using the Easy-DNA kit (Invitrogen). PCR primers were designed as listed in Table S2 to amplify nucleotide segments 5′ and 3′ to the respective fimS regions (Fig. S3C). The “on” phase generated a PCR product of size 905 bp while the “off” phase generated a product of size 356 bp. Based on the size of the PCR products as analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, the corresponding “on” or “off” phase of the fimS switch was determined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bacterial Growth and Genetic Manipulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All bacteria were grown
in Luria-Bertani broth (LB, 10 g of NaCl, 10 g of bacto-tryptone,
and 5 g of yeast
extract per liter at 37 °C).20 When
required
for the selection of plasmids, cells were grown in the presence of
100 μg/mL ampicillin, 30 μg/mL chloramphenicol, or 30
μg/mL kanamycin. Plasmids were prepared using the
Qiagen mini-prep kit (Qiagen). Restriction endonucleases (New England
Biolabs) and T4 ligase (Invitrogen) were used according to the manufacturers’
instructions. Genomic DNA was isolated using the protocol for bacterial
cultures in the Easy-DNA kit (Invitrogen). Transformation-competent E. coli cells were prepared by the method of Inoue et al.21 (link) Double-stranded DNA sequencing was performed
with an ABI Prism 377
instrument at the Duke University DNA Analysis Facility. Primers were
purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Generation of PRDX1 Knockout and Overexpression Constructs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA containing exons 2–4 of PRDX1 was obtained by PCR from DT40 genomic DNA using the Easy-DNA Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) and Ex-Taq polymerase (Takara Bio Inc., Otsu, Shiga, Japan). The chicken targeting constructs for PRDX1, PRDX1-blasticidin and PRDX1-ecogpt, were generated by replacing exons 2–4 with the blasticidin or ecogpt selection marker cassette. To construct an expression plasmid carrying ggdPRDX1 cDNA (ggdPRDX1cDNA) with the tet-off promoter, ggdPRDX1 cDNA was obtained by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) using mRNA from DT40 cells using SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) and Flag-tagged PRDX1 cDNA inserted into the pUHG 10–3 vector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genetic Screening for Lipodystrophy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood using the Easy-DNA kit (Invitrogen). The coding regions and the splice site junctions of LMNA, PPARG, PLIN1, and CIDEC were amplified with gene-specific primers as described earlier (38 (link)). The PCR product was purified to remove primers and dNTPs and Sanger sequenced using ABI Prism 3100. The exon and surrounding 5′ and 3′ regions of ADRA2A were amplified with gene-specific primers. In addition, 64 patients with unexplained FPLD were genotyped for ADRA2A using Sanger sequencing. We also performed Sanger sequencing of the candidate variants in PVRL1 and SLC25A1 among the family members to investigate for segregation with the phenotype.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Whole Genome Sequencing of Peripheral Blood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peripheral blood was extracted using Easy DNA kit (Invitrogen). Whole genome sequencing was performed with Nextera Exome Capture System, followed by NGS with Illumina HiSeq 2500 (Mendelics Genomic Analysis). The study was approved by the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA) Research Ethics Committee.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Maceration and DNA Extraction from Murine Organs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Initially, 50–100 mg specimens were obtained from each stored mouse organ (spleens, livers, hearts, lungs, and brains). These specimens were macerated with a mortar and a pestle in liquid nitrogen to prepare for DNA extraction. For the extraction, we used an Easy-DNA Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) with protocol number 3 from the kit.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genome Sequencing of Xanthomonas oryzae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Xoo strains used for genome sequencing in this study were collected over several decades from different rice planting areas in China (Table S1). For comparison, the represented Xoo strains belonging to 4 different races from Japan and 6 different races from Philippines were also used. The genomic DNA of each Xoo strain was extracted and purified from the overnight using the Easy-DNA kit (Invitrogen, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocol. And then the genomic DNA were sequenced by using Illumina HiSeq 2000, 2500, or 4000 to generate paired-end reads with lengths of 100, 125, or 150 bp. For each Xoo strain, raw reads were assessed with the FastQC tool (https://github.com/s-andrews/FastQC) and quality filtered using Trimmomatic (https://github.com/timflutre/trimmomatic) and bases with low quality were discarded. The filtered reads were error-corrected by library with Quake to produce clean reads.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genetic Characterization of ENU2 Mouse Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eighty days old homozygous (−/−) PahEnu2 (ENU2) and (+/+) PahEnu2 (WT) male mice of BTBR background strain were used for all experiments and were obtained by heterozygous mating. In a separate set of experiments, we used 3 male ENU2, 4 female ENU2 and 7 female heterozygous (+/–; HTZ) mice for the study of a possible gender effect (age: 40–60 days).
Genetic characterization was performed on DNA prepared from tail tissue using the Easy DNA kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The ethylnitrosourea (enu2) mutation was detected after PCR amplification of exon 7 of the Pah gene and digestion thought restriction enzyme BsmAI (NewEnglandBiolabs, Inc., USA) as previously described (Pascucci et al., 2008 (link)). Mice were weaned at postnatal day (PND) 21, experimental subjects (sex matched) from different litters were housed 2–4 per cage with food and water ad libitum on a 12:12 h dark: light cycle (light on 07.00 a.m.–07.00 p.m. h).
All efforts were made to minimize the number of animals used and to alleviate their discomfort. All experimental procedures were performed in strict compliance with the Italian (D.L. 26/2014) and European Union Directive (2010/63/EU) on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. All animal experiments were approved by the Italian Ministry of Health (Rome, Italy).
Brain tissue was collected from ENU2 and WT mice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

DNA Extraction and Enzymatic Digestion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from liver tissues by using a DNA extraction kit (Easy-DNA Kit, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The purity of DNA preparations was assessed by A260/A280 ratio. One hundred μl (~100 xg) of individual genomic DNA samples was digested with nuclease P1 (20 μg nuclease P1 dissolved in 20 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 4.8) by incubating at 37 °C for 30 min followed by treatment with alkaline phosphatase (AP) (1.3 U or 100 μg AP in 1 M Tris–HCl, pH 7.4) and incubation at 37 °C for 1 h (Ma et al., 2008 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!