The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Antibiotic disks

Manufactured by Mast Group
Sourced in United Kingdom

Antibiotic disks are a type of lab equipment used for antibiotic susceptibility testing. They are small, circular disks impregnated with specific antibiotics. Antibiotic disks are placed on agar plates inoculated with bacterial cultures to determine the susceptibility of the bacteria to various antibiotics.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using antibiotic disks

1

Antimicrobial Susceptibility of P. aeruginosa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed on the isolates by disk diffusion method based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline. The tested antibiotic disks (MastGroup Ltd., UK.) for P. aeruginosa isolates were piperacillin (PRL, 100 μg), piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ, 100/10 μg), ceftazidime (CAZ, 30 μg), aztreonam (ATM, 30 μg), imipenem (IMI, 10 μg), doripenem (DOR, 10 μg), gentamicin (GM, 10 μg), tobramycin (TN, 10 μg), amikacin (AK, 30 μg), ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 μg), norfloxacin (NOR, 5 μg), and ofloxacin (OFX, 5 μg). P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was used as the reference strain for antibiotic susceptibility testing (10 ). MDR isolates were defined if they were non-susceptible to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories (11 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (40 ). Commercially available antibiotic disks (Mast Co., United Kingdom) used in this study included ampicillin (10 μg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 μg), cefazolin (30 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), imipenem (10 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), ofloxacin (5 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), amikacin (30 μg), tetracycline (30 μg). In addition, susceptibility to colistin was performed using minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Since there are no CLSI breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae for MIC testing of colistin, its MICs were interpreted based on the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines as follows: ≤2 mg/L, susceptible; >2 mg/L, resistant (41 ). Multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotype was defined as non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial classes (42 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Staphylococcus Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic resistance patterns of S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus were determined using the disk diffusion method on the Muller-Hinton agar medium (Merck, Germany). Antibiotics used in the present study were erythromycin (15 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), gentamicin (5 μg), rifampicin (5 μg), linezolid (30 μg), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg). Antibiotic disks were purchased from Mast company (Mast Group Co., UK). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of vancomycin (Sigma) was determined by the broth microdilution method. All results were interpreted based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute criteria (CLSI, 2019) [19 ]. Resistance to at least one antibiotic from three or more classes of antibiotics was defined as multidrug resistance (MDR) [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

ESBL Screening and Confirmation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recovered isolates were screened for presumptive presence of ESBLs using cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg) and cefpodoxime (10 μg) antibiotic disks (MAST Group Ltd., Bootle, UK) according to the CLSI guidelines [20 ]. Antibiotic disk diffusion tests were performed using 0.5 McFarland standard inoculums on Mueller Hinton agar (BioMerieux) and incubated overnight at 37°C. Using CLSI screening guidelines, bacterial isolates with zone inhibition diameters ≤ 27 mm for cefotaxime and ≤ 22 mm for ceftazidime were reported as positive for ESBL screening. As recommended by CLSI, cefpodoxime disks were included in the ESBL screening with breakpoints of ≤17 mm for study isolates. Study isolates resistant at these breakpoints were reported as positive for ESBL screening. All isolates with a positive result in the ESBL screening test with at least one of the three screening agents were selected for ESBL confirmation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using disk diffusion method according to the the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (16 ). In doing so, the following antibiotic disks (MastGroup Ltd., Merseyside, United Kingdom) were used: ampicillin (25 μg), amoxicillin–clavulanic acid (20/10 μg), piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), amikacin (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), and tobramycin (30 μg). Likewise, MICs of amikacin and gentamicin were determined using E-test (Liofilchem, Italy) on Muller-Hinton agar (Biolife, Italy). E. coli strains ATCC 25922 and ATCC 35218 were used as controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genetic Determinants of Antimicrobial Resistance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genetic determinants for AMR were identified using staramr v0.5.1 (https://github.com/phac-nml/staramr) against the ResFinder78 (link) and PointFinder79 (link) databases. Phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the EUCAST disk diffusion method80 (link) (Antibiotic disks; ampicillin 10 μg, chloramphenicol 30 μg and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 25 μg from Mast Group). To compare the results of genotypic against phenotypic testing, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for first line agents used over the study period using MedCalc’s test evaluation calculator with Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals (https://www.medcalc.org/calc/diagnostic_test.php).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibiotic Susceptibility of E. coli and K. pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility of E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates was carried out using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [15 ]. Commercially available antibiotic disks (Mast Co., United Kingdom) used in this study included ampicillin, (10 µg), piperacillin (100 µg), piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), cefepime (30 µg), cefixime (30 µg), imipenem (10 µg), ertapenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), aztreonam (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), levofloxacin (5 µg), ofloxacin (5 µg), moxifloxacin (5 µg), gatifloxacin (5 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), kanamycin (30 µg), tobramycin (10 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 µg).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of Bacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined by disk diffusion method in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (17 ). The following antibiotic disks (MastGroup Ltd., Merseyside, United Kingdom) were applied: amoxicillin–clavulanic acid (20/10 μg), piperacillin-tazobactam (100/10 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), amikacin (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), tobramycin (30 μg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (25 μg), fosmomycin (200 μg), imipenem (10 μg), ertapenem (10 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), and tigecycline (15 μg). In addition, MICs of cefoxitin were determined using E-tests (Liofilchem, Italy) on Muller-Hinton agar (Biolife, Italy). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as the control strain for the antibiotic susceptibility tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of Bacterial Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Resistance or sensitivity of the strains toward eight antibiotics was interpreted by using several antibiotic diffusion disks compared with MIC for strains, which have determined previously toward various antimicrobial agents. Therefore, at first 1% (approximately 107 cells) overnight strains were added to MRS and nutrient broth with concentration 0.5 MacFarlane, and a certain volume of the mediums divided into plates, pour plate method. By solidifying mediums, antibiotic disks (Mast Co, UK) applied the surface. Antibiotics were used in following concentration: 10 µg ampicillin, 10 µg penicillin, 10 µg gentamicin, 30 µg chloramphenicol, 30 µg novobiocin, 30 µg erythromycin, 30 µg nalidixic acid, 130 µg bacitracin. The plates were incubated at 30 °C under aerobic condition for Bacillus sp. and anaerobic for Lactobacillus sp., after passing 24 h, inhibition zone measured. In general, strains were considered as resistance if the inhibition zone diameter was ≤10 for ampicillin, penicillin and gentamicin, ≤15 mm for chloramphenicol, novobiocin, erythromycin and nalidixic acid, ≤18 mm for bacitracin. Results were interpreted according to the cut-off levels published in CA-SFM (2011).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Bacterial Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed based on the Kirby-Bauer method according to the protocol provided by the CLSI 2021. The antibiotic disks (Mast Group, Merseyside, UK) used in our study were as follows: ampicillin (10 mg), cefoxitin (30 mg), ceftazidime (30 mg), ceftazidimeclavulanate (10/10 mg), cefotaxime (30 mg), cefotaxime-clavulanate (10/30 mg), cefuroxime (30 mg), cefepime (30 mg), meropenem (10 mg), gentamicin (10 mg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 mg), nitrofurantoin (300 mg), and ciprofloxacin (5 mg) [12] . By definition, if a bacterial isolate was non-sensitive to at least one antimicrobial agent in three classes or more, it was called MDR [5] . Boronic acid method was used to identify the AmpC b-lactamase-producing isolates [13] . The combined disk method was also used to identify the extended-spectrum b-lactamase (ESBL) producing strains [14] . E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as control strain. The modified Hodge test (MHT) was used to confirm the non-susceptible to meropenem [14] . To investigate the effect of vaborbactam on KPC producing strain, the K. pneumoniae ATCC 13883 was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!