The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nanodrop one onec microvolume uv vis spectrophotometer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Italy, Canada

The NanoDrop™ One/OneC Microvolume UV-Vis Spectrophotometer is a compact, table-top instrument designed for the quantification and analysis of nucleic acids and proteins in small sample volumes. It utilizes a patented sample retention technology that enables direct measurement of sample concentrations without dilution.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

78 protocols using nanodrop one onec microvolume uv vis spectrophotometer

1

Faecal DNA extraction and quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The faecal samples were quantified, and total DNA was extracted using an OMEGA kit (Omega Bio‐Tek, USA) according to its instructions. The DNA and RNA were analysed using 0.8% gel electrophoresis and a NanoDrop™ One/OneC Microvolume UV–Vis spectrophotometer (NanoDrop™ One/OneC Microvolume UV–Vis spectrophotometer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) to calculate A260/A280 values and to check the purity and concentration of DNA and RNA, followed by storage of DNA at −20°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Bacterial DNA Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Amoxicillin–clavulanic acid-resistant isolates and the ancestral isolate were grown in 10 ml LB and incubated at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm for 18 h. DNA extraction was performed using the Gentra Puregene Yeast/Bact. Kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The pellet was air-dried at room temperature for 5 min. The DNA was dissolved in 50 μl molecular grade water for 1 h at 65°C and the DNA concentration determined using a NanoDropTM One/OneC Microvolume UV–Vis Spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genomic DNA and RNA Extraction from DBS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total RNA was isolated from the dried blood spots using the miRNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and the total DNA using the QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Quantity and quality were assessed using a NanoDropTM One/OneC Microvolume UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the samples were then stored at −20 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

BRCA1 Gene Variant Detection Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was isolated using DNeasy Blood & Tissue (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and DNA concentrations were measured using a NanoDrop™ One/OneC Microvolume UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Primers were designed to anneal around the Cas9 cutting site within the BRCA1 gene. To detect small indel variations, a short sequence around the Cas9 cutting site was amplified, while to detect larger variations a longer fragment was amplified (Table 3)
For PCR, GoTaq® Flexi Polymerase (Promega, Walldorf, Germany) with the Green GoTaq® Flexi Reaction Buffer supplemented with 5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM dNTPs, 100 pmol/µL forward and reverse primer, and 100 ng genomic DNA as template was used. PCR was performed using a Primus 25 advanced® Thermocycler with the following conditions: Initial denaturation (95 °C for 2 min) followed by 35 cycles of denaturation (95 °C for 30 s), annealing (54 °C for 30 s) and extension (72 °C for 50 s), ending with a final extension (72 °C for 10 min). Fragments were then loaded on to a 2% agarose gel, run for 30 min at 120 V, and stained with ethidium bromide, or analyzed by BioAnalyzer 2100 Expert (B.02.08.SI648) using DNA 7500 chips (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Osteoblast and Osteoclast Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the expression levels of osteoblastogenesis and osteoclastogenesis, the total RNA was isolated using the TRIzol reagent following the manufacturer’s instructions. The purity and concentrations of RNA were measured by a NanoDrop One/OneC Microvolume UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at an absorbance of 260/280 nm. Complementary DNA was prepared by 1 µm of total RNA using the RevertAid™ H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentas, Hanover, NH, USA). qRT-PCR was processed by a SYBR Green I qPCR Kit (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan) and the fluorescence was measured by a CFX Connect™ Real-Time System (Bio-Rad). The specific primers for osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation are listed in Supplementary Table S1. The relative gene expressions were normalized by mouse Gapdh for osteoblasts and mouse Hprt for osteoclasts, and the fold change was determined using the 2−ΔΔCt method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

CML Leukocyte RNA Isolation and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peripheral blood (PB) leukocytes were isolated by Buffy Coat procedure from 37 CML patients, according to LabNet recommendations, and 5 healthy donors. Total RNA was extracted using Maxwell 16 LEV simplyRNA Blood kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA samples were then quantified by NanoDrop™ One/OneC Microvolume UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and aliquoted for RT-qPCR and ddPCR experiments. CML samples were divided into 5 groups based on the MR levels [3 (link),6 (link)] obtained in routine RT-qPCR analysis as follows: group 1, MR < 3, n = 10; group 2, MR 3, n = 9; group 3, MR 4, n = 8; group 4, MR 4.5 and 5, n = 10, and group 5, healthy donors, n = 5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Spinal Cord RNA Isolation Using RNeasy Kit

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated from spinal cords using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Spinal cords were weighed and suspended in 10 μl/mg of RLT buffer. Three hundred microliters of each sample was diluted 1:2 with RLT for a 30 mg/600 μl mixture. Ten microliters per milliliter of BME was added to the samples. Spinal cords were then homogenized by gentle pipetting. Spinal cord lysates were transferred to QIAshredder tubes and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 15 s. Six hundred microliters of 70% alcohol was added to each QIAshredder, spun at 13,000 rpm for 15 s, and transferred to separate RNAeasy columns. The RNAeasy columns were centrifuged twice for 15 s at 13,000 rpm, discarding the flow-through after each step. Seven hundred microliters of Buffer wash RW1 were added to each column. Samples were spun 15 s at 13,000 rpm, with the flow-through discarded. Two successive washes of 500 μl of Buffer RPE were added to the samples and spun at 13,000 rpm for 2 min. The columns were placed in collection tubes and then washed with 50 μl of RNase-free water to elute the RNA. RNA quantity (nanograms/microliter) and quality (A260/280) were measured using a NanoDrop™ One/OneC Microvolume UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Bacterial DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA extraction was performed using the Precellys Evolution homogenizer (Bertin Technologies SAS, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France). Each bacterial colony was homogenized using acid-washed 425–600 μm glass beads obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA. The extract was then boiled for 5 minutes at 100 °C and centrifuged for 5 minutes, and the supernatant was gently transferred. DNA concentration and purity were measured using Qubit fluorometer with dsDNA high-sensitivity assay kit (Invitrogen, Waltham, Ma, USA) and NanoDrop™ One/OneC Microvolume UV–Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Ma, USA), using the ratio of absorbance at 260 nm vs. 280 nm. The genomic libraries were prepared using the Nextera Flex kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Sequencing was performed using iSeq 100, generating 151-bp paired-end reads (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Ultrafiltration Nucleic Acid Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the nucleic acid occurrence in the three fractions after ultrafiltration, the quantity of DNA molecules has been assessed by the NanoDrop™ One/OneC Microvolume UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., London, UK); absorbances at 260 nm and 280 nm were measured and concentrations were calculated as: DNA concentration (ng/μL)= A260nm·50 ng/μL1a.u.
The quality of the DNA has been evaluated by the direct measurements of the ratios A260/A280.
For the electrophoresis analysis, equal volumes of feed, permeate and retentate from the same UF assay were solubilized in an equal volume of loading buffer under stirring overnight at RT. Samples were separated in a 0.8% agarose gel using 0.5X TBE as the running buffer; bromophenol blue was added to the samples as a tracking dye. The 10 kbp DNA ladder was used (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). After 30 min of running at 70 mA, 120 V, the gel image was digitalized using a UV Transilluminator (Consort bvba, Turnhout, Belgium) equipped with a photocamera.
All analytical measurements were performed in triplicate. Results were expressed as mean value ± SD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Spinal Cord RNA Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated from spinal cords using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Spinal cords were weighed and suspended in 10ul/mg of RLT buffer. 300ul of each sample was diluted 1:2 with RLT for a 30 mg/600ul mixture. 10ul/ml of BME was added to the samples. Spinal cords were then homogenized by gentle pipetting. Spinal cord lysates were transferred to Qiashredder tubes and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 15 seconds. 600 ul of 70% alcohol was added to each Qiashredder, spun at 13,000 rpm for 15 seconds, and transferred to separate RNAeasy columns. The RNAeasy columns were centrifuged twice for 15 seconds at 13,000 rpm, discarding the flow-through after each step. 700ul of Buffer wash RW1 were added to each column. Samples were spun 15 seconds at 13,000 rpm, with the flow-through discarded. Two successive washes of 500 ul of Buffer RPE were added to the samples and spun at 13,000 rpm for 2 minutes. The columns were placed in collection tubes, then washed with 50ul of RNase-free water to elute the RNA. RNA quantity (ng/ul) and quality (A260/280) were measured using a NanoDrop One/OneC Microvolume UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!