The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using fitc anti mouse cd206

1

Macrophage phenotype analysis by flow cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RAW264.7 cells were incubated in RPMI 1640 medium with 10 μg/ml SCAT-EXOs, 10 μg/ml PVAT-EXOs or equal amounts of PBS for 24 h, and then 50 ng/ml lipopolysaccharide (LPS, Sigma-Aldrich) was added for another 24 h. After being washed twice with cold PBS, the cells were harvested and incubated for 30 min at 4°C in the dark with antibodies including APC-anti-mouse F4/80 (Biolegend, CA, USA), PE-anti-mouse CD80 (Biolegend) and FITC-anti-mouse CD206 (Biolegend). The cells were analysed by flow cytometry (BD Pharmingen, NJ, USA) and FlowJo 7.5 (FlowJo, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of CD206+ Tumor-Associated Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
OCI-Ly3 xenograft tumour tissues were collected, digested, and filtered to prepare mono-cellular suspensions. To quantify the ratio of CD206-positive TAMs in primary tumour cells, cells were washed twice with PBS containing 1% FBS, dispersed cells were incubated with PE/Cy5 anti-mouse F4/80 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA) and FITC anti-mouse CD206 (Biolegend) antibody for 15 min on ice. The resulting suspensions were immediately analysed using a digital BD Caliber flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterizing Retinal and Choroidal Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To examine macrophages in the retina and choroid, cells were prepared from mouse eyes. To collect a sufficient number of ocular in ltrating cells, 50 burns were delivered to mouse eyes by laser. After laser injury, eyes were enucleated at different time points (1, 2, 3, 5, and 7days). The anterior segment (cornea, iris, and lens) was excised and the posterior segment of the eye including sclera, choroid, and retina was disrupted with scissors and then shaken in DMEM (plus 10% FBS (Gibco Laboratories), 100U/ml penicillin, 100μg/ml streptomycin) supplemented with 0.5mg/ml Collagenase type D (11088874103, Boehringer Mannheim) at 37°C for 60min. The supernatants were collected and passed through a mesh. After 3 washes, viable cells were obtained. A total of 12 eyes (6 individual pools) were examined per group. The cells were stained with PE anti-mouse CD11b (557397, BD Pharmingen), FITC anti-mouse CD206 (MMR, 123005; BioLegend) and PE-Cy5 anti-mouse CD80 Abs (15-0801-81, eBioscience).
RAW 264.7 cells were stained with PerCP anti-mouse CD11b (101230, BioLegend), PerCP anti-mouse F4/80 (123006, BioLegend), PE anti-mouse CD80 (12-0801, eBioscience), and FITC anti-mouse CD206 (141704, BioLegend).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Phenotypic characterization of macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the polarisation, THP-1-derived macrophages were harvested and washed in PBS. 1 × 106 cells were then stained using anti-CD11b-PE-Cy7, CD209-FITC, CD163-PE, CD115-PE-Cy7, CD204-FITC, CD206-APC (BD Pharmingen, USA) for 30 min at 4 °C. 1 × 106 cells isolated from fresh xenograft tissues were stained using FITC-anti-mouse F4/80 (Bio-Rad), FITC-anti-mouse CD206 (Biolegend). An isotype-matched IgG was used as negative control. Results were analysed by flow cytometry (FACSCalibur, BD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Macrophage Polarization Assay with Hydrogels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
0.1 g PVA, MoS2/PVA, GO/PVA, and MoS2/GO/PVA hydrogels were firstly added to the 24-well plate, then NE-4C cells were seeded in the wells with a density of 1 × 105 cells. Then 100 ng/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (L4391-1 mg, Sigma-Aldridge) were added to the culture for 24 h, and cells were then collected, washed twice with cold PBS, stained with FITC anti-mouse CD206 (141703 Biolegend, USA) and PE anti-mouse CD11c (101307, Biolegend, USA) in the binding buffer for 30 min, and then detected by flow cytometry (FACS Calibur flow cytometry; BD Biosciences). FlowJo-V10 software was used to analyze the proportion of M1and M2 macrophages in each group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Tumor Immune Cell Phenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor was dissected and filtered through a cell strainer (100 µm, Corning, USA) in PBS. Red blood cells (RBC) were lysed using ACK (Ammonium-Chloride-Potassium) RBC Lysing Buffer (0.15 M NH4Cl, 10.0 mM KHCO3, 0.1 mM Na2 EDTA), and the B16-F10 and immune infiltrating cells were kept in PBS. One million cells per well were stained in a round bottom 96 well plate using a two-step staining protocol. First, cells were stained with a live/dead dye (Fixable aqua 405 nm, Invitrogen, USA) at 4°C for 20 min, cells were washed, and 100 μL final volume of a solution containing surface antibodies diluted in staining buffer (1% fetal bovine serum, FBS, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.02% NaN3 in PBS) were added into each well. After 30 min at 4°C, the samples were washed (2X) and resuspended in staining buffer until acquisition. The following antibodies were used: PerCP-Cy5.5 Anti-Mouse CD80 (Clone 16-10A1 Cat no. 194722), APC-Cy7 anti-Mouse F4/80 (Clone BM8 Cat no. 123118), FITC Anti-Mouse CD206 (Clone C068C2 Cat no.141704), from Biolegend, USA, and PE-Cy7 anti-mouse CD86 (Clone GL1 Cat no. 560582) from BD, USA. Samples were assessed with a FACSCanto II cell analyzer (Becton Dickinson, USA) using DiVA 8 acquisition software and FlowJo 5 V10 (Becton Dickinson, USA) data analysis software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Exosome-Mediated Macrophage Polarization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw264.7 macrophages were treated with 10 μg/mL exosomes or an equal volume of PBS (negative control) in serum‐free RPMI1640 for 24 hours. Positive control groups for M1 and M2 polarization were incubated with lipopolysaccharide (500 ng/mL) or interleukin (IL)‐4 (20 ng/mL) under equal conditions. Then, the cells were harvested and stained with specific antibodies for 30 minutes at 4°C in the dark. After washing with PBS, the stained cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (FACSCanto II; Becton‐Dickinson) to determine the M1 and M2 macrophage phenotype. PE‐antimouse CD80, FITC‐antimouse CD206, APC‐antimouse F4/80, and corresponding isotype controls (104707, 141703, 123115; Biolegend) were used in this procedure. Data analysis was performed with FlowJo software (FlowJo LLC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Macrophage Polarization Evaluation in Mouse Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The brain tissues were obtained from mice after treatment. The brain tissues were cut with scissors, digested with collagenase type IV containing 0.1%, and then prepared into cell suspensions by sieve grinding, and the samples were resuspended by 40% and 70% percoll and centrifuged to collect non-lymphocytes and lymphocytes for use. Lymphocytes were labeled with Percp-cy5.5-anti-mouse CD11b antibody (dilution of 1:50, catalog number: 101228, clone: M1/70, Lot: B353753, Biolegend), FITC-anti-mouse CD206 antibody (dilution of 1:100, catalog number: 141704, clone: C068C2, Lot: B350306, Biolegend) and APC-anti-mouse CD86 antibody (dilution of 1:80, catalog number: 105071, clone: GL-1, Lot: B323580, Biolegend) to detect the polarization of macrophages. The expression level of PDL1 in tumor cells was detected with FITC-anti-mouse CD45 antibody (dilution of 1:100, catalog number:103108, clone: 30-F11, Lot: B363202, Biolegend) and APC-anti-mouse PDL1 antibody (dilution of 1:50, catalog number: 124312, clone: 10F.9G2, Lot: B277024, Biolegend).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Phenotyping Spleen Macrophage Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse spleen lymphocyte cells were harvested as mentioned previously. Surface biomarkers, PE-anti-mouse CD68, PE/Cy5-anti-mouse CD197, and FITC-anti-mouse CD206 antibodies, were obtained from Biolegend, CA, USA. Nine μL fluorescence conjugated antibodies were mixed with 50 μL cell suspensions and incubated at 4 °C in dark for 30 min. Cells were washed and resuspended in 200 μL analysis buffer (RPMI 1640, 5% FBS, 2 mM l-glutamate, and 2 × Dulbecco’s phosphate buffer saline). Two differentiated cells, M1 (CD68+/CD197+) and M2 (CD68+/CD206+) were analyzed using a FACSCalibur™ Flow Cytometer (BD Bioscience, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Macrophage Phenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis, 105 peritoneal macrophages or THP-1-induced M0 macrophages (CTR group and UVB group) were isolated and resuspended in 100 µl PBS, and antibodies were added to the corresponding cells. Flow cytometric analysis was performed by FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences) using Flow Jo software. The following antibodies were used: PE/Cyanine7 anti-human CD206 (BioLegend, 321,124), FITC anti-human CD86 (BioLegend, 374,204), APC anti-human CD163 (BioLegend, 333,609), PE/Cyanine7 anti-mouse CD86 (BioLegend, 105,014), FITC anti-mouse CD206 (BioLegend, 141,704), PE/Cyanine7 anti-mouse CD204 (Invitrogen, 2,263,083), and PE anti-mouse CD163 (BioLegend, 156,703).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!