The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using saccharin

1

Maternal Nicotine Exposure in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Kingston, NY) and housed in the Florida State University Laboratory Animal Resources facility. The facility is a temperature-and humidity-controlled environment maintained on a 12-h light-dark cycle (lights off at 7:00 a.m. and on at 7:00 p.m.). The mice had food and water available ad libitum. Breeding age (8-12 weeks old) female mice were randomly assigned to one of the 3 experimental groups based on the type of drinking water supplied: PNE group was provided with water containing nicotine (100 μg/mL (-)-nicotine; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO; Cat# N3876) and 2% saccharin (Alfa Aesar, Heysham, UK; Cat# A15530); the saccharin group was provided with water containing 2% saccharin (Fig. 1a). To control for the potential effects of saccharin, a third group of mice received plain water [27] [28] [29] 37] . After 3 weeks, female mice in each group were bred with drug-naïve male mice. Based on the presence of a vaginal plug, the day of successful mating was designated embryonic day 0 (E0) and the day of birth postnatal day 0 (P0). The litter size was standardized to contain 6-8 offspring on the day of birth. The 3 types of water were continued until the pups were weaned on P21. Throughout pregnancy, each female mouse was singly housed. Upon weaning, same sex offspring were housed 2-4 per cage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Saccharin Regulates Laser-Induced CNV

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The animal experiments complied with the guidelines of the ARVO statement for the use of animals in ophthalmic and vision research. They were also approved by the local government authorities (Landesamt für Gesundheit und Soziales, LaGeSo, Berlin). Twelve male C57BL/6J mice purchased from Charles River (Germany) have been used for the described experiments. All of them were 10 to 14 weeks old and weighed more than 22 g (mean 25.5 g) at the time of the laser-induced CNV. The animals were housed in a 12-hour day/night cycle and got food and water ad libitum. One day before the laser treatment, we added 0.03% saccharin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to the drinking water of our saccharin intervention group (Sa; n = 6). The Sa group got the saccharin-containing water for 15 days (until the end of the experiments) while the control group (Co; n = 6) got pure water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

THC Suspension Preparation and Administration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIDA, Rockville, MD) was suspended in a 7.8% polysorbate 80 (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH) and saline (Patterson Vet Supply, Charlotte, NC) mixture. Experiments 1–3 used a 10% sucrose (Fisher Scientific) mixture combined with the THC solution or comparable vehicle. Experiment 4 used a 0.1% saccharin (Fisher Scientific) solution. Flavorants (LorAnn Oils, Lansing, MI) were purchased commercially (see supplemental information for available details regarding chemical composition). Injected THC or vehicle was given i.p. at a volume of 1 ml/kg.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Binge-Like Ethanol Consumption in Mice: The DID Paradigm

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After two-weeks of acclimation to the designated diet and the vivarium, cohort one was subjected to the DID paradigm, a well-established model of binge-like ethanol consumption (Thiele and Navarro, 2014 , Thiele et al., 2014 (link)). Briefly, three hours into the dark cycle, home-cage water bottles were replaced with modified sipper-tubes that were created as described in Thiele et al. (2014) (link) that were filled with 20% (v/v) ethanol made from a solution of 95% ethanol (Decon Labs, King of Prussia, PA) and tap water. During the first three days, animals were allotted two-hours of access to ethanol; however, on the fourth (test) day, ethanol consumption (g/kg) was measured after four-hours of access. Tail blood samples were collected immediately following the four-hour access period on test days. This 4-day procedure was repeated a second time with a three day rest period in between the two, 4-day DID tests. Following all ethanol testing, cohort one mice were tested using the same DID access procedure but with access to tap water, 1% sucrose (Fisher Scientific, Inc. Pittsburg, PA), 3% sucrose, 0.15% saccharin (Fisher Scientific Inc. Pittsburg, PA), and 0.004%(w/v) quinine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in tap water, sequentially. This was done to determine if consumption differences between diet conditions were unique to ethanol or generalized to other non-alcohol tastants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Olfactory Mixtures and Gustatory Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stimuli consisted of aqueous solutions of odor compounds (obtained from www.sigmaaldrich.com), >98% purity, dissolved in distilled water), and were acquired by the animal by licking from an open lick spout, resulting in a combination of ortho- and retro-nasal olfactory stimulation just like in natural consumption. We used monomolecular odorants with no known naïve palatability, and no known gustatory or trigeminal chemesthetic qualities (citral, citronellal, octanal and 2-hexanone). Mixtures included citral+octanal and citronellal+octanal, presented at multiple absolute and relative concentrations (see Table 1). For 1:1 mixtures, total mixture concentration was 0.025% (components presented at 0.0125%); for 5:1 mixtures, total mixture concentration was 0.025% (low concentration) or 0.075% (high concentration), with components presented at 0.021% and 0.004%, or 0.0625% and 0.0125%, respectively. A control odor (2-hexanone) was always presented at 0.025%. Saccharin (0.1%; www.fishersci.com) was used as an unconditioned stimulus during conditioning sessions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Odor Stimuli and Intraoral Delivery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unisensory odor stimuli were exemplars of monomolecular odorants (obtained from Sigma-Aldrich; >98% purity) that have been used in similar behavioral (Blankenship et al., 2019 (link)) and neural recording (Maier, 2017 (link)) paradigms in previous studies: methyl valerate and 2-hexanone in aqueous solution (0.025% volume/volume in distilled water). Saccharin (0.2%; Fisher Scientific) was used as an unconditioned stimulus during conditioning sessions. All stimuli were presented intraorally to allow, as much as possible, natural sensory stimulation dynamics associated with intraoral evaluation of flavor. There is no empirical evidence that the odorants used here completely lack gustatory and/or trigeminal qualities. However, similar concentrations of odor solutions have been shown to be below nonolfactory behavioral detection thresholds (Slotnick et al., 1997 (link); Gautam and Verhagen, 2012 (link)) and are therefore unlikely to have contributed to the observed responses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Synthesis and Characterization of Carbamazepine Polymorphs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anhydrous carbamazepine (CBZ), salicylic
acid (SLC), and sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) were purchased from Sigma
Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO) and used as received. Carbamazepine
dihydrate (CBZD) was prepared by slurrying anhydrous CBZ in deionized
water for 24 h, and solid was obtained through vacuum filtration.
Saccharin (SAC) was purchased from Acros Organics (Pittsburgh, PA)
and used as received. Isopropanol, acetonitrile, methanol, and hydrochloric
acid were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA). Sodium
hydroxide pellets were purchased from J.T. Baker (Philipsburg, NJ).
Water used in this study was filtered through a double deionized purification
system (Milli Q Plus Water System) from Millipore Co. (Bedford, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Synthesis of Pharmaceutical Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Indomethacin, furosemide and p-aminobenzoic acid were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Saccharin was acquired from Acros Organics (Morris, NJ, USA). The solvents were obtained from POCH (Polish Chemical Reagents, Gliwice, Poland). The purity of substances was ≥98%, the purity of solvent ≥99.8%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Opioid Pharmacology: Antagonist and Analgesic

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Saccharin (Acros Organics #149005000) was diluted to several concentrations (the highest being 0.1%) in tap water. Oxycodone HCl was supplied by the NIDA drug sharing program. Oxycodone was diluted at various concentrations in either tap water for self-administration experiments, or sterile saline for injections and osmotic minipump loading. Naloxone Hydrochloride was purchased from Spectrum Chemical (#N1231), dissolved in sterile saline, and injected at 1 mg/kg intraperitoneal (i.p.) immediately prior to assessing jumping behavior. Lidocaine (Covetrus, North America VINB-0024-6800) was injected locally at 4 mg/kg subcutaneously (s.c.) prior to incision for minipump implantation. Carprofen (Zoetis) was injected i.p. at 5 mg/kg prior to incision for minipump implantation, and again at 24 and 48 h after surgery.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Corticosterone Hemisuccinate Solution Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Corticosterone hemisuccinate (CORT; 4-pregnen-11β,21-diol-3,20-dione21-hemisuccinate, Steraloids, Newport, RI, USA) was prepared fresh every three days. CORT was dissolved in tap water and stirred overnight at a pH of 10–11 and neutralized to a pH of 7.0–7.4 prior to use. Ethanol (EtOH; Decon Labs, King of Prussia, PA, USA) and saccharin (Acros Organics, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) were diluted in tap water to concentrations of 10% (v/v) and 0.1% (w/v), respectively, to make the sweetened EtOH solution. Yohimbine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in double distilled water to a concentration of 1.25 mg/mL. GRK2i (GRK2 inhibitory polypeptide; Tocris, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was dissolved in saline to a concentration of 2 mM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!