The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

90 protocols using whatman filter no 1

1

Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Insect Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Feed and A. domesticus samples were freeze-dried for 72 h and then milled into a powder before processing. Microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) was done as described previously by Liu et al. [22 (link)] with a microwave accelerated reaction system (MDS, MARS-Xpress/230/60, CEM Corporation, Matthews, NC, USA). Briefly, 12 g of feed or cricket powder were suspended in 120 mL of petroleum ether while stirring for 30 min at room temperature. Then, the sample was microwaved at 900 W for 120 s at a controlled temperature of 40 °C.
The solvent was removed by filtration with a Whatman No. 1 filter, and the solid residue was collected for the next extraction step. The residue was then suspended in 120 mL of extraction solvent (methanol: d-water, 7:3 v/v), stirred for 30 min at room temperature and microwaved again at 900 W for 300 s at a controlled temperature of 50 °C. The solvent was collected and separated from the solid residue by filtration using a Whatman No.1 filter, then concentrated in a rotary evaporator at 55 °C, and finally freeze-dried for 48 h to obtain the extract. The freeze-dried extracts were stored at −85 °C in sealed containers until further use. The extraction was done in duplicate for each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Extraction of C. macroptera Fruit Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fresh, mature C. macroptera fruit samples were rinsed thoroughly under cold running water. The fruit pulp was separated from the peel and cut into small pieces using a sterile smooth steel knife and completely dried under sunlight for 28 h. Then, the dried samples were combined using a blender (Jaipan Commando, Mumbai-63, India). The blended samples were soaked in pure ethanol (100%) for 24 h and shaken (3 g) at 30°C for 72 h. Then, the extract was filtered through a cotton plug and then through Whatman No. 1 filters. The crude extract was evaporated under reduced pressure (100 psi) at a controlled temperature (40°C) and stored at −20°C prior to analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Extraction of Medicinal Mushroom Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The material used in the research was dry, powdered mushrooms: Maitake, Lion’s Mane and Reishi, purchased from the Polish certified dealer, MagicznyOgród. To prepare the extracts, 5 g of powdered mushroom was weighed into a beaker. and 100 mL of water was added. Afterwards, the beakers were placed in an ultrasonic bath (Digital Ultrasonic Cleaner) for 5 min. After this time, the obtained extracts were filtered through Whatman No. 1 filters. After filtration, the extracts were evaporated in a concentrator at a temperature of 40 °C under reduced pressure. From the obtained dry extracts, stocks with a concentration of 100 mg/mL were prepared and stored at 4 °C for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fluorescent Dot-Blot Assay for Transglycosylase Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A fluorescent dot-blot assay was used to estimate transglycosylase activity in vitro (Fry, 1997 (link); Chormova et al., 2015 (link)). Whatman No. 1 filters (Whatman, Dassel, Germany) were coated with nine different biologically relevant cell wall polysaccharides [1% (w/v) in dH2O; see previous paragraph], left to dry and coated with sulphorhodamine-labelled xyloglucan oligosaccharides (XyGO-SRs; ∼5 µM) prepared according to Kosík and Farkaš (2008) (link) from enzymatically digested tamarind xyloglucan (Sulová et al., 1995 (link)). Test papers were loaded with 5 µl of algal enzyme extract and incubated in darkness at ∼20°C between acetate sheets to maintain humidity for 2 h. Papers were washed in ethanol:formic acid:water (1:1:1, v/v/v) for 1.5 h, rinsed twice with dH2O and dried overnight. Orange fluorescence emitted by bound XyGO-SR was visualized by using a CX-20 work station [excitation 365 nm; Spectronics Corp., Westbury (NY), USA] connected to a Nikon Coolpix 8400 camera (Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Test papers lacking XyGO-SR or polysaccharide coating, or loaded with heat-inactivated enzyme extracts served as controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fluorescent Dot-Blot Assay for Transglycosylase Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A fluorescent dot-blot assay was used to estimate transglycosylase activity in vitro (Fry et al., 1997 ; Chormova et al., 2015 ). Whatman No. 1 filters (Whatman, Dassel, Germany) were coated with nine different biologically relevant cell wall polysaccharides (1% (w/v) in dH2O; see previous paragraph), left to dry and coated with sulphorhodamine-labelled xyloglucan oligosaccharides (XyGO-SR; ~5 µM) prepared according to Kosík and Farkas (2008) (link) from enzymatically digested tamarind xyloglucan (Sulová et al., 1995 (link)). Test papers were loaded with 5 µL of algal enzyme extract and incubated in darkness at ~20°C between acetate sheets to maintain humidity for 2 h. Papers were washed in ethanol:formic acid:water (1:1:1, v/v/v) for 1.5 h, rinsed 2 × with dH2O and dried overnight. Orange fluorescence emitted by bound XyGO-SR was visualized by using a CX-20 work station (excitation 365 nm; Spectronics Corp., Westbury (NY), USA) connected to a Nikon Coolpix 8400 camera (Nikon Corp., Tokyo, Japan). Test papers lacking XyGO-SR or polysaccharide coating or loaded with heat-inactivated enzyme extracts served as controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Edible and Medicinal Mushroom Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fruiting bodies and mycelium of 17 edible and medicinal mushrooms, namely, Agaricus blazei, Dictyophora indusiata, G. lucidum, Hericium erinaceus, Hypsizygus marmoreus, I. obliquus, Lentinus squarrosulus, L. edodes, Lentinus TAFRS007, Lentinus TAFRS011, Lentinus TAFRS014, Morchella esculenta, Cordyceps sinensis, Pleurotus sajor-caju, Pleurotus eryngii, Phellinus igniarius, and Tremella fuciformis were collected from local markets in Thailand. The fruiting bodies or mycelia were cut into small pieces, ground, and lyophilized for 2 days. Then, the dried small pieces of mushrooms were ground into powder and divided into three parts. Each part was extracted with each solvent, distilled water (DW), and 99.5% ethanol and hexane. Ethanol and hexane extractions were carried out by incubating at 37°C in a shaker at 180 rpm overnight, while the DW extraction was performed at 25°C overnight in a shaker at the same rpm. After that, all crude extracts were filtered through Whatman no.1 filters and centrifuged at 7000 rpm, 4°C for 15 min to remove precipitate. The ethanol and hexane solvents were removed using a hot air oven at 80°C, and the DW was removed by lyophilization. The mushroom powder was redissolved in 100% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to a final concentration of 100 mg/mL. The crude extracts were kept at −20°C until used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extractions were carried out in two different media: Methanol (MeOH; HPLC grade) and water (Milli-Q waters). For the methanol extraction, leaves were lyophilized (ModulyoD/23, Thermo Savant; Waltham, MA, USA) and crushed with a grinder. Extraction was performed as follows: 2.5 g of dry material was extracted with 50 mL MeOH in an ultrasonic liquid processor (Qsonica Sonicators; Newton, CT, USA) with a power of 55 W and a frequency of 20 kHz, for 10 min (using 50% power) at room temperature. Extractions were done in triplicate. After sonication, solutions were filtered through Whatman No.1 filters. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure in a Hei-Vap Precision rotary evaporator (Heidolf; Schwabach; Germany) at 40 °C. Dried extracts (DE) were stored at −20 °C until analysis.
On the other hand, the extraction with water was carried out in the following way: 2.5 g of fresh leaves (crushed with a grinder) was extracted with 150 mL H2O at 100 °C in a hot plate (C-MAG HS7, IKA; Staufen, Germany) for 30 min. Extractions were done in triplicate. After that, solutions were filtered through Whatman No.1 filters. Finally, the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure in a rotary evaporator and the dried extracts were stored at −20 °C until analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Extraction and Preparation of Plant Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extractions were carried out in methanol (MeOH; HPLC grade). The aerial parts of the plants were lyophilized (ModulyoD/23, Thermo Savant; Waltham, MA, USA) and crushed with a grinder. Extraction was performed as follows: 2.5 g of dry material was extracted with 50 mL MeOH in an ultrasonic liquid processor (Qsonica Sonicators; Newton, CT, USA) with a power of 55 W and a frequency of 20 kHz, for 10 min (using 50% power) at room temperature. Extractions were performed in triplicate. After sonication, solutions were filtered through Whatman No.1 filters. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure in a Hei-Vap Precision rotary evaporator (Heidolf; Schwabach; Germany) at 40 °C. Dried extracts (DE) were stored at −20 °C until analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Soil Physicochemical Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Soil pH was measured using a standard procedure where replicate 10 g aliquots of air-dried soil were suspended in 25 ml freshly-boiled deionised water. Soil organic carbon (SOC) and total N was determined by LECO analysis, subtracting carbonate released by incubation with hydrochloric acid from total C to estimate organic C. To extract soluble C from soil (Ghani et al. 2003 (link)), samples frozen immediately after collection and stored at −80 °C, were shaken in sterile distilled H2O (sd H2O - soil: water, 1: 10) at 300 rpm for 30 min, 20 °C. After centrifugation (swing-out rotor, 246×g, 20 min, 20 °C) the supernatant was decanted, soil resuspended and shaken as before for 16 h at 80 °C. The total non-purgeable organic C in the supernatant of this fraction was determined by wet oxidation using a Shimadzu TOC-V WS analyser. A simplified method was used to measure un-decomposed organic detritus (from plants and mesofauna): 5 g soil suspended in 10 ml sdH2O was shaken for 24 h at 300 rpm, 4 °C. The suspension was centrifuged (swing-out rotor, 50×g, 10 min, 20 °C) and the material remaining in suspension was weighed after collection on pre-weighed Whatman no 1 filters and overnight drying at 80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying IAA, GA, and ACC-deaminase in DEMTzZ3A0

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the IAA, GA and ACC-deaminase concentrations, the DEMTKz3A0 isolate inoculum (1.0 × 105 conidia per mL) prepared as described before (Section 4.5) was cultivated in 100 mL Erlenmeyer flasks with 20 mL of a modified RB medium supplemented with solutions of glucose (1%) as a carbon source, and the phytohormone precursors tryptophan and methionine (3 mM) sterilized using syringe filters (0.22 μm) at 12, 20, and 28 °C and 60% relative humidity in an Innova 4900 growth chamber (New Brunswick Scientific, Edison, NJ, USA) at 120 rpm for 2, 3, 4, and 5 days. The dry weight of mycelium (mycelium d.w.) was determined after collecting on Whatman no. 1 filters and weighting after drying at 65 °C for 24 h. To determine the ability of the DEMTzZ3A0 strain to synthesize IAA, GA, and deaminase ACC the supernatants of the liquid culture were additionally centrifuged (10,000× g for 10 min).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

  Request a quote for « Whatman filter no 1 »