The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Galaxy s8

Manufactured by Samsung
Sourced in United States, Japan

The Samsung Galaxy S8 is a high-performance smartphone. It features a 5.8-inch Quad HD+ Super AMOLED display, an Exynos 8895 processor, and 4GB of RAM. The device has a 12-megapixel rear camera and an 8-megapixel front-facing camera. It is powered by a 3,000mAh battery and runs Android 7.0 Nougat.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

24 protocols using galaxy s8

1

Quantifying Myoglobin Protein Concentration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The purified Mb protein was quantified using a Multiskan GO Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the millimolar extinction coefficients of 14.9 for 542 nm and 12.8 for 580 nm. These values were obtained by converting the units of the extinction coefficients reported by de Duve32 (link). Observations of the relative absorbance of oxy-Mb and carboxy-Mb were also used to estimate the concentration of oxy-Mb using these extinction coefficients. A Samsung galaxy S8 was used to capture images in order to record the color difference between the extracts of agroinfiltrated and untreated tobacco.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Assessing Hearing Aid Apps Worldwide

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three authors independently searched for hearing aid apps with the aim of providing information on the apps most likely to be found and used around the world, we selected 14 among a total of 27 apps initially identified (Table 1, Fig. 1). Apps equipped with amplification based on a user’s audiogram or self-hearing test and a sufficiently low processing delay (<30 ms) [8 (link)] were considered “high-end,” while the rest were considered “low-end.” We used an iPhone 8 (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA) for iOS apps, a Galaxy S8 (Samsung, Seoul, Korea) for Android apps, and two wired earbuds with built-in microphones provided with the smartphone by each manufacturer: Apple A1748 EarPods with lightning connector and Samsung EO-IG955 earbuds tuned by AKG. We also used a pair of wireless earbuds (AirPods Pro, Apple Inc.) to assess processing delay of the 10 hearing aid apps that provided Bluetooth-enabled versions. For the hearing aid, we tested the Siya 1 miniRITE coupled with two 85 dB receivers and single closed ear tips (Oticon, Smorum, Denmark).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Smartphone-based Fundus Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All four participating students received standardized training from an experienced ophthalmologist, who presented the device and explained how to handle it, in addition to monitoring the recording of the first 10 videos. For the smartphone-based examination, the students captured a high-definition video of the fundus, lasting around two minutes each, using a device that consisted of an iron support where a smartphone (in this study, an Apple Iphone 6 ® or a Samsung Galaxy S8 ®) was attached to one side and a 20 D lens was attached to the other side. The device also had an iron adapter on the bottom that allowed its attachment to a slit lamp table. This made image acquisition easier as the patient's head remained fixed by the chin rest, facilitating handling of the camera and adjusting its focus (Fig. 1C and D; Fig. 2). Nothing but the inbuilt camera software of each smartphone were used to register the images. The smartphone’s own flash light was kept on and served as illumination for the entire recording. All the included patients underwent pharmacological mydriasis prior to the exam. After posterior pole focus was obtained, recording was started and the patient was asked to look into five directions in the following order: (1) Straight ahead; (2) Temporally; (3) Nasally; (4) Superiorly and (5) Inferiorly.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Gel Nanosensor Optical Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All optical images of the gel nanosensor were acquired using an Apple iPhone 7 or a Samsung Galaxy S8 camera under ambient lighting and automatic settings, which were maintained throughout the course of the study. The images were cropped to the desired size for representation. No further editing or post-processing was carried out. These images were not used for quantification of the dose but only for visualization of the gels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Urban Ultrafine Particle Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UFP concentrations, videos of the journeys, and GPS locations were captured along each route. Three P-traks (TSI Model 8525) were used to record UFP in the diameter range of 0.02–1 mm, in the concentration range from 0 to 105 pt/cc and at 1-s resolution [37 ]. During sampling, the P-traks were held in the hand of the researcher (at about the height of a child’s breathing zone). Each researcher was equipped with a pocket GPS (Qstarz Q1000X [38 ]) device to track their location at one second intervals, with locations subsequently linked to the UFP concentration. A Samsung Galaxy S8+ [39 ] and a Samsung Galaxy note 10 lite [40 ] were used to capture videos of the roads and recordings of researchers, speaking about why any observed peaks in UFP concentration may have been occurring.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Enzyme-Based Colorimetric Sensor Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
20 µM stock enzyme solution of ß-Gus was prepared in sterilized PBS (pH 7.4) and the desired enzyme concentrations were prepared by further dilutions in PBS (pH 7.4) and LB (pH 7.0). 100 µL of the enzyme solutions tested were deposited on the paper sensors and incubated at 25 °C. Pictures were taken at different time intervals with a Samsung Galaxy S8 camera in a standardized position on a black box with integrated illumination, designed and produced by the workshop of the University of Siegen (see Figure S5). The illumination was done with a LIVARNO LUX light-emitting diode (LED) light strip (100–240 V, 50/60 Hz) fixed within the black box.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Capturing Microscope Footage Using Smartphone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Olympus teaching stereo microscope has a dual head of binocular; one is for objective lens (main head) and the other one is for digital camera (secondary head) (Fig. 2B). We used the secondary head to attach the camera of Samsung Galaxy S8 (Fig. 2A) to the eyepiece. All videos were edited using MovieZilla Movie Maker Software.

Equipment used for making video.

Fig. 2

Eggs preparation.

Fig. 3
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Copulatory Behavior of Tenebrio molitor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To record the copulatory behavior of T. molitor we followed the protocol in [23 (link)]. We placed each pair, female, and the chosen male, in a glass container (12.2 cm diameter × 16.4 cm height) with a fine layer of wheat bran. All copulations were recorded using a 12-megapixel camera (Samsung Galaxy S8+) with an OIS lens. Copulation was considered successful if it lasted more than 30 s, since that is the approximate time that a male takes to transfer a spermatophore [29 (link)]. For the copulation analysis, we considered: a) the number of times the male tapped with his legs on the sides of the female’s elytra (hereafter, leg contact behavior); and b) the number of times the male tapped the edges of the elytra and the thorax with his antennae during copulation (hereafter, antennal contact behavior). The person who scored beetle behavior was blind to the male’s treatment (infection status). All the experiments were carried out between 12 and 18 h due to T. molitor’s diurnal habits [30 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Wound Healing Assay for Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The migration activity was measured using wound healing assay. Cells were seeded in a 6‐well plate and wound was given when cells reached 70%–80% confluence. Using a 1 mm Scar™ Scratcher (SPL), straight line of artificial wound was created on the cell monolayer and PBS washing was followed. The wound healing was observed and photographed after 24 h. Cells were examined under a microscope (Olympus). Images were taken with GalaxyS8 (Samsung) and the remaining wound size was analyzed using the ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

VR and Video Impacts on Schizophrenia Perceptions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After arriving at the laboratory, participants were seated in front of a laptop and randomly assigned to one of the three groups. They were informed about the study procedure and their right to stop participation anytime. All participants were informed that they were about to answer questions regarding their perceptions of persons with schizophrenia. Participants in the VR group and in the regular video group were additionally informed that they were about to watch a video of a person who suffered from schizophrenia talking about their experiences, and—in the case of the VR video—that this may cause slight dizziness.
In the VR group, the assistant then revealed the VR headset (Zeiss VR One with a Samsung Galaxy S8) that was hidden in a drawer and helped the respondent mount it. Participants were then given about 90 seconds to become acquainted with the virtual surroundings. The assistant then started the video on the phone. In the regular video group, the assistant started the video on the laptop. In the control group, no video was shown. All participants then filled out a questionnaire on the laptop. At the end, participants were comprehensibly debriefed and handed over a fact sheet about schizophrenia. For the debriefing document, see the online supplementary material (OSM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!