The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using chromas version 2

1

Sequencing and Analyzing rpoC Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The rpoC region (1,730 bp) was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the GeneAmp PCR System 9600 (PerkinElmer, Foster City, CA, USA) with primers 5′-CGAAAACCTCTACCGCGAAC-3′ and 5′-CACGGAAGGAGGACTTGACC-3′10 (link).
Briefly, the PCR parameters were 5 minutes at 95℃, followed by 40 cycles of 45 seconds at 94℃, 45 seconds at 60℃, and 60 seconds at 72℃, with a final extension step at 72℃ for 10 minutes. The PCR products were purified using a QIAEX II Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen Inc., Mainz, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions and sequenced using a BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing kit with AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using primers 5′-CGAAAACCTCTACCGCGAAC-3′ and 5′-CACGGAAGGAGGACTTGACC-3′10 (link). The nucleotide sequences were analyzed using BioEdit software version 5.0.9.1 (Ibis Biosciences, Carlsbad, CA, USA), Chromas version 2.33 (Technelysium, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, http://www.technelysium.com.au/chromas.html), and the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST, National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD, USA, http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Mutations in the rpoC-encoding regions were defined as any nucleotide changes that led to translational changes in RpoC compared with the RFP-susceptible strain, H37Rv (ATCC 27294).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Blastocystis SSU rDNA Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from a sub-population of Blastocystis positive samples to the microscopic observation, selected on the basis of abundance, using a faecal DNA kit (Bioline, UK) according to the manufacturer's protocol. A fragment of about 600 bp from the SSU rDNA gene was amplified using the primers RD5 (5’-ATCTGGTTGATCCTGCCAGT-3′) and BhRDr (5’-GAGCTTTTTAACTGCAACAACG-3′), following the PCR-conditions previously described [15 (link)]. Amplicons were sequenced using the forward amplification primer (Bio-Fab Research, Rome, Italy). The resulting chromatograms were analysed and edited using the software Chromas version 2.33 (Technelysium Pty Ltd., Australia). The sequences obtained were compared to those of Blastocystis STs previously deposited in GenBank using the BLAST application (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST). The STs were identified by determining the exact match or closest identity (99%), according to the classification given by Stensvold [16 (link)] (https://pubmlst.org/blastocystis/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Rifampicin Resistance Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bidirectional sequencing was carried out on the rifampicin resistance-determining region of the rpoB gene in all the rifampicin-discordant strains using forward (CGTTGATCAACATCCGGCCGGTG) and reverse (CCACCTTGCGGTACGGCGTT) primers and analyzed by using Chromas, version 2.33, software (Technelysium Pty. Ltd., Helensvale, Australia).[14 (link)]
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Analysis of RNF180 Promoter Methylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bisulfite sequencing PCR (BSP) was used as a quantitatively analyzed method for detecting the methylation rate of the RNF180 promoter area. The gene sequence for this study was obtained from Genebank. The MethylKIT package (http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/methylKit.html) of R software was used to analyze methylation data, all CpG sites and transcription initiation site (TSS). Genomic DNA sodium bisulfite modification was performed by Zymo DNA Methylation-Gold kit (Cat. Nos. D5005 or D5006, Zymo Research, US) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed by the enzyme TaKaRa Taq™ Hot Start Version (Code No. R007A Takara, Japan). The primers were as follows: F:5′-GTGGTTTTGGTAAGGGGATGAT-3′; R: 5′-AACAACCAAACTCTAAAAACTC-3′.11 (link) The condition was as follows: 94°C for 3 mins for initial denaturation, run 45 cycles (94°C 20 s, 58.5°C 30 s, 72°C 45 s); after the end of the cycles followed by an extension 10 mins at 72°C, a final termination at 4°C. PCR purification products were used for forward sequence analysis. Chromas version 2.6.6 (Technelysium Pty Ltd., Australia) was used to analyze sequencing results. According to the theory of bisulfite modification, methylation rate calculation formula was as follows: Meth%=C/(C+T)*100%.12 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Confirming Genetic Variants through Sanger Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All substitutions or indels identified through WES were confirmed by Sanger sequencing, and available family members were sequenced for segregation analysis (Supplementary Figs. S1S7). Potential de novo variants were confirmed by sequencing of parental DNA and excluding nonpaternity. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of CYP1B1 and FOXC1 was performed on Veriti 96 Well Thermal Cycler (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). The protocol used for CYP1B1 amplification has previously been published.15 (link) PCR for FOXC1 was performed according to PCR Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase Protocol (Thermofisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using the GC-buffer and 2x S-Solution (Solis BioDyne, Tartu, Estonia). Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit version 1.1/3.1 (Thermofisher Scientific) was used for the Sanger reactions and a 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) performed capillary sequencing. Sequences were visualized by Chromas version 2.6.6 (Technelysium, Brisbane, Australia). Primers are available on request. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was used to confirm FOXC1 CNVs using the SALSA MLPA P054-B2 FOXL2-TWIST1 probemix (MRC Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) according to the manufacturer's instructions. MLPA amplicons were analyzed using a 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) and Sequence Pilot version 5.0 (JSI medical systems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

FLT3-ITD Allelic Ratio Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fragment analysis electropherograms (Figure 1) were generated using the GeneMapper v6 software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, United States), and displayed the size of the alleles obtained for the target PCR fragments (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, United States). FLT3-ITD allelic ratios were determined by calculating the ratio of the area under the curve of the FLT3-ITD mutant allele to the FLT3 wild-type allele as displayed by GeneMapper.
The sequence was analysed using the Sequencing Analysis Program version 5.3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, United States) and Chromas version 2.6.6 (Technelysium Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Australia). Tables were generated using Microsoft Word 2016 (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, United States). Patients’ demographic data and AML classification were summarised in table format. Ethnicity, defined as either black, white or mixed race, was based on patients’ self-proclaimed identity and accordingly documented.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

POLE Gene Hotspot Mutation Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Direct sequencing was performed using the Sanger method to detect hotspot mutations on exons 9, 13, and 14 of the POLE gene. Genomic DNA was extracted from tumor specimens of 10‐μm FFPE slices resected during radical surgery using the QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The samples were enriched using the GoTaq Colorless Master Mix (Promega). The primers used for PCR amplification and the PCR conditions are listed in Tables S1 and S2. An Applied Biosystems 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to analyze the samples. Two researchers (H.Y and Y.H.) evaluated the results using Chromas Version 2.6.6 (Technelysium Pty Ltd) and confirmed suspected mutations using reverse primers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fusarium species identification by HRM analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We selected the RPB2 and TEF-1α region for HRM analysis. In order to design primers flanking short and variable subsections of RPB2 and TEF-1α, we first amplified both regions for the eight reference strains of Fusarium (Table S1), as described by Lofgren et al. [59 (link)] for RPB2 and O’Donnell et al. [60 (link)] for TEF-1α. PCR products were purified and sent to Macrogen Europe for Sanger sequencing (Macrogen Europe B.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands). The results were evaluated with Chromas version 2.6.6 (Technelysium Pty Ltd, South Brisbane, Australia). Multiple sequence alignment was then performed using ClustalW [61 (link)] in MEGA version 7.0.26 [62 (link)]. Alignments were processed in T-Coffee version 11.00y [63 (link)] and ESPript version 3.0 [64 (link)] (Figure S1). Two new primers suitable for HRM analysis were designed based on multiple gene alignments using the sequences of our eight reference strains (Table 1). Primer binding sites were conserved among species. We hereinafter refer to the selected subsections as sRPB2 and sTEF-1α. The amplicon length was 304 bp for sRPB2 and 247 bp for sTEF-1α (Table 1). Finally, a maximum likelihood analysis was conducted for sRPB2 (1000 bootstrap replications) and sTEF-1α (without bootstrapping due to low sample size (n = 3)) using MEGA 7.0.26.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Phylogenetic Analysis of Orientia tsutsugamushi

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The obtained chromatograms were visualized using DNA sequencing software Chromas version 2.6.6 (Technelysium Pty Ltd, Brisbane, QLD, Australia). The forward and reverse primer sequences were assembled using BioEdit version 7.2. The sequence data was identified and compared with preexisting sequence data (as on 29th October 2022) from GenBank, using NCBI BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). All the 49 sequences obtained during this study were deposited in GenBank with accession numbers OP617281-OP617329The reference sequences of Orientia tsutsugamushi 56-kDa TSA genes were obtained from GenBank. The reference sequences along with the sequences from this study were aligned using Clustal W (http://www.clustal.org/). Phylogenetic tree with 1000 bootstrap replicates were obtained by Neighbor-joining method and pairwise distances were estimated using the maximum likelihood (ML) method. Phylogenetic tree and evolutionary analyses were conducted in Mega X [16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Phylogenetic Analysis of ITS2 Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sequence results were edited and tr immed using Chromas version 2.01 (Technelysium Pty Ltd., Brisbane, Queensland, Australia), and compared to the GenBank submitted sequences using the BLAST programs and databases (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The sequences of the ITS2 gene were submitted to the GenBank database (accession numbers: MN845160-MN845180). Phylogenetic analysis was performed with sequences obtained in the present study along with the reference sequences, which were deposited in the GenBank database, using Maximum-Likelihood algorithm and Tamura-3-parameter model in the MEGA 6.0 software. Bootstrap value was determined based on 1000 replications for evaluation of the phylogenetic tree reliability.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!