The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Phoenix winnonlin version 8

Manufactured by Certara
Sourced in United States

Phoenix WinNonlin® version 8.1 is a software application developed by Certara for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data analysis. It is designed to assist researchers and professionals in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries with the analysis and modeling of drug concentration and response data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

32 protocols using phoenix winnonlin version 8

1

Pharmacokinetics of Tamoxifen and Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CYP2D6 genotype was assessed by the Infiniti test (Autogenomics, Carlsbad, CA) and the Quantstudio test (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Plasma samples were analyzed for tamoxifen, NDM, 4-OH and endoxifen concentrations by a validated liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC–MS/MS) method in accordance with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) bioanalytical method validation guidelines.20 ,21 (link) A non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis of concentrations was performed using Phoenix WinNonlin, version 8.1 (Certara, Princeton, NJ). 4β-OHC to cholesterol ratios were determined as described previously.22 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Pharmacokinetics of Tucatinib and ONT-993

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from plasma concentrations of tucatinib and ONT-993 using noncompartmental methods, performed using Phoenix WinNonlin Version 8.1 (Certara L.P., Princeton, NJ). The PK parameters evaluated were area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the time of last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t), AUC from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞), maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax (Tmax), apparent plasma terminal elimination half-life (t½), apparent total plasma clearance (CL/F; tucatinib only), metabolic ratio based on AUC0-∞ (MRAUC; ONT-993 only), and metabolic ratio based on Cmax (MRCmax; ONT-993 only). The fu was used to calculate AUC0-t,u, AUC0-∞,u, Cmax,u, CL/Fu and the unbound tucatinib for each individual volunteer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Platinum Pharmacokinetics in HIPEC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed as described in Fig. 1. At the end of HIPEC, a small peritoneal tissue sample (~ 1 × 2 cm) from the dorsal side of the posterior rectus sheath was collected in patients of both groups. In the patients treated in the flushing group, a second peritoneal sample was collected immediately after flushing with crystalloids. Peritoneal tissue pre-treatment was performed according to an earlier described method [14 (link)]. After HIPEC, four drainage tubes were fixed to drainage bags to collect outflowing drain fluid during the postoperative period as described in Fig. 1. The total volume of drain fluid per bag was noted, starting the morning after HIPEC. Immediately after sampling, the drain bags were changed. All samples were stored at − 40 ℃ until analysis. Platinum concentrations were measured using flameless atomic absorption spectrometry according to a previously described method [17 (link)].
For non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis, Phoenix WinNonlin® version 8.1 (Certara USA Inc, Princeton, NJ) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Pharmacokinetic Analysis of PXL770

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples for PK analysis of PXL770 were collected from each subject predose on Days 14 (fasting conditions) and 26 (fed conditions – standardized breakfast) at 30 min, 45 min, and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 h postdose, and on Day 28 during the DNL assessment at the same time points as employed in the DNL procedure. Plasma concentrations of PXL770 were analyzed using validated protein precipitation and high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy (HPLC-MS/MS) methods. Pharmacokinetic samples collected from subjects who received placebo were not analyzed for PXL770. The analytical phase was carried out in accordance with GCP guidelines. The lower limit of quantification for PXL770 plasma concentrations was 10 ng/mL. Pharmacokinetic data were analyzed using validated PK analysis software (Phoenix® WinNonlin® version 8.1, Certara, Princeton, NJ). All PK analyses were performed, saved, and audit trailed in a 21 Code of Federal Regulations Part 11 compliant Oracle database (Phoenix® Knowledgebase Server Online). All plasma PK parameters were calculated using actual time points relative to the time of study drug administration. If actual time was missing, nominal time was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Pharmacokinetics of Meperidine in Horses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Previous studies have demonstrated non-linearity with respect to clearance of opioids in horses [18 (link), 19 ]. Therefore, non-compartmental analysis was performed on plasma meperidine concentrations using a commercially available software (Phoenix WinNonlin Version 8.1, Certara, Princeton, NJ, USA) to assess whether similar behavior was seen with respect to meperidine clearance. Lambda zz) was used to calculate the terminal half-life (HL λz) using the Eq. 0.693/ λ. The area under curve (AUC) from time 0 to infinity (AUC0→∞) was obtained by using the linear up log down trapezoidal rule. Clearance (Cl) and the apparent volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) were determined using the following formulas:
Vss=MRTinfxCl
where MRT is the mean residence time.
Non-compartmental analysis, as described above was also used for determination of pharmacokinetic parameters for normeperidine.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Urate-Lowering Drugs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pharmacokinetic variables (peak plasma concentration (Cmax); time to Cmax, time of peak plasma concentration (Tmax); AUC from zero to infinity (AUC0–∞) for rosuvastatin and dose‐interval AUC from zero to 24 hours (AUC0–24) for allopurinol and febuxostat; elimination half‐life (t½); amount excreted into urine; and renal clearance (Clrenal)) of rosuvastatin, allopurinol, and febuxostat were calculated by standard noncompartmental methods using Phoenix WinNonlin, version 8.1 (Certara, Princeton, NJ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous and Subcutaneous Dosing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were dosed at 20 nmol/kg
intravenously or subcutaneously. 200 μL blood samples were taken
at 2, 6, 10, 24, 30, and 48 h processed to plasma, extracted and analyzed
by UPLC-MS. Quantification was done using a calibration curve prepared
from spiked plasma samples. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated
using Phoenix WinNonlin version 8.1 (Certara L.P., USA), considering
a non-compartmental model.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Absolute Lymphocyte Count and Heart Rate Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) analysis, blood samples were collected at the following time points: day −1: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h; day 1: 0 (predose), 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 h (postdose); day 2–day 20 (predose); day 21: 0 (predose), 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 264, 312, 360, 408, 456, and 504 h (postdose).
The maximum effect (Emax), the area under the ALC–time curve from time zero to the last measurable point (AUEClast) and change of those parameters from the baseline (ΔEmax and ΔAUEClast), and the time to maximum effect (TEmax) and maximum change of ALC from the baseline (CFBmax) were calculated using the noncompartmental method of Phoenix WinNonlin® version 8.1 (Certara, Princeton, NJ, United States).
The baseline ALC of each subject was defined using the following formula: Baseline ALC=AUEC024 of Day124
For heart rate analysis, 24-h Holter monitoring was performed the day before the first dosing (day 1), on the first dosing (day 1), and last dosing (day 21). The hourly average heart rate (HR) and the area under the hourly HR–time curve (AUECHR) were calculated for each individual subject.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of LC51-0255

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For PK evaluation, serial blood samplings were performed at the following time points: day 1: 0 (predose), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, and 24 h (postdose); day 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 19, and 20 (predose); and day 21: 0 (predose), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, 168, 216, 264, 312, 360, 408, 456, and 504 h (postdose). Urine samples were collected at the following time points and intervals: day 1: 0 (predose), 0–24 h (postdose); day 21: 0 (predose), 0 to 24, 24 to 48, 48 to 72, 72 to 96, 96 to 120, 120 to 144, and 144–168 h postdose.
PK parameters were analyzed using a noncompartmental method using Phoenix WinNonlin® version 8.1 (Certara, Princeton, NJ, United States). The maximum steady-state plasma concentration of LC51-0255 (Cmax,ss), the time to reach maximum plasma concentration following administration of LC51-0255 at the steady state (Tmax,ss), the area under the plasma concentration–time curve during a dosing interval at steady state (AUCτ,ss), the terminal half-life (t1/2), the accumulation ratio calculated from AUCτ,ss and AUCτ after single dosing (Rac), the peak trough fluctuation over one dosing interval at steady state, apparent clearance at steady state (CLss/F), apparent volume of distribution during the terminal phase (Vz/F), the fraction of drug excreted into urine (fe), and renal clearance (CLR) were calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Bioanalytical Quantitation of Tapinarof and Metabolite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Concentrations of tapinarof and tapinarof sulfate (metabolite) were determined in plasma samples using a validated bioanalytical method. The lower limit of quantitation of the assay, which corresponds to the lowest concentration that can be reliably measured, was 50 pg/mL for tapinarof and 10 pg/mL for tapinarof sulfate. All PK analyses were performed using Phoenix® WinNonlin® Version 8.1 (Certara, Princeton, NJ, USA) as part of a 21 CFR Part 11-compliant database system (Pharsight Knowledgebase Server™). PK parameter estimates for tapinarof on days 1 and 29 were calculated using noncompartmental analysis of the plasma concentration versus time data utilizing the actual sample collection time. AUC0–last values were estimated using the linear up-log down method. A minimum number of three data points were required for determination of the AUC0–last.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!