The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using geldoc instrument

1

B4GalT1 Oligomerization Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein samples were mixed with Tris/glycerol native sample buffer and loaded onto a 4–12% polyacrylamide gel. The gel was run in Tris/glycine buffer supplemented with 0.02% Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 dye until the samples had migrated 1 cm into the gel, then without the dye at 20 mA for 2 hours. Bovine serum albumin (BSA Fraction V, Sigma) was used as a reference for molecular weight. The samples were then transferred onto a 0.45 μm nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Protran, GE Healthcare) for 2 hours at 200 mA in a transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, pH 8.3). The membrane was quenched by using 5% non-fat milk in TBS-Tween (50 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.02% Tween 20, pH 7.6) supplemented with 0.1% BSA overnight at 4°C. The blot was then incubated with Anti-B4GalT1 antibody (HPA010807, Sigma,1:2000) in TBS-Tween + 0.1% BSA for 2 hours at room temperature, washed 3 x 10 min with TBS-Tween before incubation with the goat anti-rabbit HRP 1:10000 (Abliance, Compiègne, France) in TBS-Tween + 0.1% BSA for 1 hour at room temperature. After final washings (4 x 15 min in TBS-Tween), ECL reagent (BioRad) was added and the membrane was photographed using a GelDoc instrument (BioRad). A linear correlation between the log of the molecular weight of BSA oligomers and their migration distance was used to estimate the molecular weights of oligomeric species of B4GalT1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genomic DNA Polymorphism Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
84bp long genomic DNA around the polymorphism was amplified using specific primers designed using BLAT (59 (link)) (UCSC genome browser, Supplemental Table 3). Amplicons were digested by DdeI (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 4h at 37°C. Samples were run on a TBE 20% polyacrylamide gel (Invitrogen) at 100V for 3.5h and stained with SYBR Green I nucleic acid gel stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in TE buffer (10mM Tris, 1mM EDTA, pH8) for 40 min while shaking. Images were taken on a Biorad Geldoc instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Solubility Determination of Small Heat Shock Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Solubility determination was assessed as previously described (Fleckenstein et al. 2015 (link)). Briefly, 10 µg of CS in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.0 were incubated for 1 h at 45 °C in the presence or absence of HSP1, HSP2 or HSP3 or with a mixture of the three sHSP, at a molar ratio of 16:1 (sHSP:CS). Samples were centrifuged at 20,800 × g for 10 min at 4 °C to separate the soluble fraction from the pellet (i.e., containing aggregated proteins). Proteins in the soluble fraction were precipitated by cold acetone (10 min on ice) and centrifuged at 14,000 × rpm, 30 min at 5 °C. The precipitated proteins and the pellet were solubilised by the Laemmli buffer (Bio-rad) and resolved on a hand-casting 12% TGX Stain-Free polyacrylamide gel (Bio-rad), further stained with colloidal Coomassie G-250. Gel images were acquired by Gel Doc instrument (Bio-rad) and quantified by Image software. Ten µg of CS (0.3 μM in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.0), processed as all holdase assay samples, were used as control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Protein Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analyses were carried out as described elsewhere [26 (link)]. In brief, cells were lysed on plates with the lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl; 1% TX-100; 2 mM EDTA; 2 mM EGTA; 10 mM Na2PO7, pH 6.5 or pH 7.5, see below) which also contained protease inhibitors (Complete Mini, Roche, Basel, Switzerland). After clearing (12000×g for 5 min), 50–100 μg of total protein in SDS-sample buffer was run using 7.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis before immunoblotting with the appropriate antibodies. These included a rabbit polyclonal anti-B4GalT-I (#HPA010807, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), mouse monoclonal anti-HIF-1α or HIF-2α antibodies (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), mouse monoclonal anti α-tubulin antibody (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), rabbit polyclonal anti-ST6Gal-I antibody (anti-CD75, #AP21150PU-N, Acris antibodies, Herford, Germany), and anti-GlcNAcT-1 antibody (a kind gift from Prof. Pamela Stanley, NY, USA). As secondary antibodies, either anti-mouse or anti-rabbit Fab2-fragments conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (1:10000, Abliance, Compiègne, France) were used. Stained protein bands were visualized using the ECL reagent and the GelDoc instrument (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA). Quantification of protein bands from the digitalized pictures was done using the ImageLab-software from Bio-Rad.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Determining DAZ Gene Deletion by SNV PCR-RFLP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine which type of DAZ gene is deleted, we carried out single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) PCR analysis using sY587/DraI PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). The digested products (Table 2) were run on a 3% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide and visualized by BioRad Gel doc instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed using RIPA buffer and the protein content was quantified by using Bradford’s reagent (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA) as per manufacturer’s instructions. Equal quantity of protein per lane was separated by SDS-PAGE. The separated proteins were then transferred onto the PVDF membrane. The membranes were blocked for 2 h with 5% blocking buffer (5% non-fat dry milk powder in 1X PBST). After washing in 1X PBST, membranes were incubated in respective primary antibodies, Fibronectin, α-SMA, NOX-4, AGXT2 (Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO), p-eNOS, p-ERK, ERK, (Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA)), DDAH1 and GAPDH, (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), eNOS (Abcam, Cambridge, UK ),overnight at 4 °C and following the secondary antibody for 3 h. Protein bands were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescent reagent (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA) using Bio-Rad gel doc instrument. Images of the band intensity were quantified using the ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Upstream cysJI Gene Regulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DNA fragment upstream of the cysJI genes was amplified using the primer sets described in SI Appendix, Table S3. EMSA was performed using an EMSA Kit (E33075; Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the DNA-protein complex samples were run on 7% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels at 200 V for 1 h. The DNA was stained by SYBR Green EMSA stain, and the protein was stained by SYPRO Ruby EMSA stain. The polyacrylamide gel was photographed by using a Geldoc instrument (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

GATA1 Splicing Variant Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The GATA1 region flanking exon 5 and exon 6 was PCR amplified from genomic DNA from patient 1 and from a healthy unrelated individual with the addition of XhoI and NotI restriction enzyme sites (primers are as follows: GATA1 minigene forward, 5′-ATC​ATC​CTC​GAG​TCT​TGG​GTC​CTC​CTG​ACA​TC-3′ and GATA1 minigene reverse, 5′-ATC​ATC​GCG​GCC​GCC​ACA​TGG​TCA​CAC​ATT​GCA​G-3′) for cloning into the pSpliceExpress vector (Addgene; Kishore et al., 2008 (link)). The constructs were transfected into human embryonic kidney 293T cells (ATCC) with FuGENE (Promega). After reverse transcription of RNA obtained 48 h after transfection using an RNAeasy Mini kit (Qiagen), RT-PCR was performed, and amplified fragments were cloned using the TOPO TA Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to enable confirmation of sequences through Sanger sequencing. For RT-PCR analyses, the segment of interest in GATA1 was amplified with the following primers (GATA1 Exon 5, 5′-AGT​GGG​GAT​CCC​GTG​TG-3′ and GATA1 Exon 6, 5′-ATC​CTT​CCG​CAT​GGT​CAG​T-3′). Amplified products were linearized with 1X TBE-Urea (Bio-Rad), incubated for 10 min at 95°C, run on a 10% TBE-Urea Gel (Bio-Rad), and subsequently visualized on a GelDoc instrument (Bio-Rad) after 15 min of staining in ethidium bromide/1× TBE buffer. For semiquantitative analyses, bands were quantified from scanned images using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!