The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Deconvolution microscope

Manufactured by Leica

The Deconvolution Microscope is a specialized laboratory equipment designed to enhance image quality by reducing the effects of out-of-focus light. It utilizes computational algorithms to reconstruct the original sample information, resulting in sharper and more detailed images.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using deconvolution microscope

1

Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity in Cochlear Explants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cochlear explants were dissected from P3 mice and cultured in DMEM/F12 medium (Cat.# 21041025, Life Technologies Corporation) overnight at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere. Then, the samples were incubated in DMEM/F12 medium containing various concentrations of cisplatin (Cat.# 232120, Millipore Sigma, dissolved in DMEM/F12) for 2 days at 37°C. Cimetidine (Cat.# AAJ6282506, Fisher Scientific) was also dissolved in DMEM/F12 and added to the cochlear explants prior to adding of cisplatin. To monitor the cisplatin uptake in hair cells, the cochlear explants were incubated in DMEM/F12 medium containing 2 μg/mL of TR–cisplatin (Ursa BioScience) for various amounts of time. Stacked images were then captured using a deconvolution microscope (Leica) with a 63 × objective (HCX APO L63X/0.90 Water). The images were then deconvoluted using the blind deconvolution method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunostaining of Cochlear Explants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunostaining was performed as described previously (Liu et al., 2018 (link)). In brief, the cochlear explants were fixed in 4% PFA for 20 min at room temperature and then washed three times for 5 min each in HBSS. The tectorial membrane was then removed and the samples were blocked in blocking buffer (5% bovine serum albumin and 0.5% Triton X-100 in HBSS solution) for 20 min at room temperature. Then, the samples were incubated with primary antibodies diluted in antibody dilution buffer (1% BSA and 0.1% Triton X-100 in HBSS solution) overnight at 4°C. After being washed with HBSS, the samples were incubated with secondary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature. Then, the samples were mounted in ProLong ® Antifade Reagents (Cat.# P36971, Life technologies Corporation). Stacked images were then captured using a deconvolution microscope (Leica) with a 20 × objective (HC PL FLUOTAR 20x/0.55) or a 100 × objective (HCX PL APO 100x/1.40-0.70 OIL). Antibodies used in this study were anti-β2 spectrin (1:200, Cat.# sc-136074, Santa Cruz) and Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse (1:2,000, Cat.# A11017, Life technologies Corporation).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Remodelin Impacts Nuclear Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were adhered onto coverslips and incubated with Remodelin at 1 μM for 2 days. To visualize nuclei, cells were subsequently fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS and stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Images of cells were acquired using a Deconvolution microscope (Leica). CellProfiler software was used to quantify nuclear circularity and nuclear area from DAPI staining pictures, using the ‘object size shape’ measurement.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying DNA Damage Repair Foci

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were adhered onto coverslips and stained as described previously [20] (link). The antibodies used were 53BP1 (H300; Santa Cruz) and Alexa Fluor® 546 goat anti-rabbit or Alexa Fluor® 488 goat anti-rabbit (Invitrogen). Fixed cells were counterstained with diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Images of cells were acquired on a Deconvolution Microscope (Leica). Cell Profiler cell image analysis software (developed by the Broad Institute) was used for the quantification of 53BP1 focus formation. Intensity of 53BP1 was measured using the Thermo Scientific Cellomics high content screening platform where the intensity of individual foci per nucleus was assessed. Statistical significance was calculated using Fisher's exact test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescence Analysis of DNA Damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were plated onto coverslips (VWR) in a 24-well plate. Next day, cells were treated with 50 ng ml−1 NCS or 2 μM TAK-733 for 30 min and 24 h, respectively, and DMSO treatment used as a control. Cells were allowed to recover for 2 h, washed twice with ice-cold PBS and fixed with 4% PFA+0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 20 min on ice. Cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 20 min at room temperature and blocked with 10% FCS+0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 1 h with always three washes between individual steps. Primary and secondary (Alexa Fluor 546 goat anti-rabbit and Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse; Invitrogen) antibodies were diluted in blocking solution and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, cells were stained with DAPI (1:1,000 in PBS, Sigma-Aldrich) for 20 min at room temperature in the dark. Cell images were acquired on a deconvolution microscope (Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!