The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Systat

Manufactured by Grafiti LLC
Sourced in United States

SYSTAT is a statistical software package designed for data analysis and visualization. It provides a comprehensive set of analytical tools and functions to support researchers, scientists, and professionals in various fields. The software's core function is to enable users to perform statistical analyses, generate graphical representations of data, and manage data efficiently.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

76 protocols using systat

1

Physician Payment Disclosure Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We summarized general payments to physicians using descriptive statistics including proportion of physicians receiving payments and amounts received. We also conducted analyses based on journal type (general vs. specialty), sex (male vs. female), and payment database (CMSOP and PDD). Payment database was examined as prior work identified minor discrepancies across databases (9) (link). To compare across groups, we utilized t-tests and Mann Whitney tests for continuous data and chi-square tests for categorical data. All statistical analysis was performed in SYSTAT (Version 13, SYSTAT Software, Inc, San Jose, California). GraphPad Prism (Version 8, GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, California) was used to generate figures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Soil Carbon Analysis in Wetlands

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-test were conducted using SYSTAT (SYSTAT Software, San Jose, CA) to test for differences in soil carbon parameters. A stratified random sampling design was used with wetland types as the main plot factor. We also used linear regression in Sigmaplot 13 (SYSTAT Software, San Jose, CA) to determine the relationships between carbon stock estimates of peat coring and probing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Liver Tumor Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pearson’s correlation was conducted using SYSTAT (SYSTAT Software Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and SPSS (PASW Statistics 18.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Independent-sample t-test was respectively used for binary variables and continuous variables to compare liver tumor and their adjacent liver tissues. The p-value of the test was 2-tailed with a level of significance (α) = 0.05. A p-value of less than 0.05 indicated statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses and graphical data display were performed using SYSTAT (v13.1, SYSTAT Software, Inc., San Jose, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analyses for Diabetes Prevention

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using general linear nested model ANOVA, followed by posthoc assessment using Tukey test to make pair-wise comparisons. Differences were considered significant when p ≤ 0.05 using Systat (Version 12, Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA), except for comparisons shown in Figure 6B,C for which p ≤ 0.1 was used. For the diabetes prevention studies, statistical analysis of survival curves was done in Systat using Kaplan-Meier Non-parametric Survival analysis model. P values were determined by comparisons with the ‘Unloaded MP’ treatment group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Physiological Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Normality was tested with the Shapiro-Wilk test. Data that did not significantly violate normality were subjected to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures and post-hoc Tukey test for pairwise comparisons. Data that failed the Shapiro-Wilk test were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA on ranks followed by post-hoc pairwise comparisons using Dunn's method. Lines of best fit were generated by ordinary least products regression analysis. Analysis of covariance was used to determine whether these relationships differed according to the intervention (hyperoxia or hemodilution). A two-tailed P \ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed using either Sigmaplot or Systat software (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Biological Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using SYSTAT (version 13, SYSTAT Software, Chicago, IL). First, normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test (51) (link). Data that did not violate normality are presented as means Ϯ SE, whereas data that violated normality are presented as medians (25th percentile, 75th percentile). Dichotomous comparisons were made using either Student's t-test with Welch's correction or the Mann-Whitney U-test. Variables measured at multiple time points were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA, with P values conservatively adjusted using the Greenhouse-Geisser method (32) (link). Two-sided P values of Յ0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Vegetation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed with the software R (version 2.15.2; R Development Core Team 2012) and the software SYSTAT (version 12; SYSTAT Software Inc., San Jose, CA). Normality of the data was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Methane emissions, NEE and average physico-chemical pore water properties were normally distributed, while the green C. rostrata dry biomass was square-root transformed to approximate a normal distribution. Variation in CH 4 emission, NEE, C. rostrata biomass and selected physico-chemical surface and pore water properties between the different sampling dates were tested using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). In addition, Pearson correlation with bootstrapping (0.95 confidence interval) and Bonferroni probability test was used to assess the relationship between CH 4 emission or NEE and C. rostrata biomass or selected physico-chemical pore water properties. Spearman rank correlation analyses were performed to determine trends along the depth profile of the physico-chemical surface and pore water properties using mean values of the replicate samples taken each depth. Correlations were considered statistically significant for p<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Linear Discriminant Analysis for Cell Classification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fluorescence change (I/I0) patterns were subjected to linear discriminant analysis (LDA) using SYSTAT (version 13, SYSTAT Software, Richmond, CA, U.S.A.) to classify cells with different states. LDA is a revised multivariate method used to find a linear combination of features that characterizes or separates two or more classes of objects. All variables were used in the complete mode and the tolerance was set as 0.001. The raw fluorescence response patterns were transformed to canonical patterns where the between-class variance was maximized while the within-class variance was minimized.51 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

ANOVA Analysis of Experimental Conditions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Overall statistical significance, least mean squares values and standard error were obtained using two-way ANOVA via Systat (Version 12, Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA), with independent variables being the individual experimental run identifier and the particle condition identifier. Pair-wise comparisons were made by Tukey's post-hoc analysis. A p-value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. Data was plotted using Sigmaplot (Version 10, Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!