The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 570 protocols using prism 4

1

Genetic Analysis of Glutathione Reductase

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The distributions of the three genotypes Gsr+/+, Gsr+/-, and Gsr-/- for male, female and combined male and female were compared separately with the expected distribution calculated by Mendel's Laws of Inheritance (0.25:0.5:0.25). The Chi-squared test was used to do the comparison as previously described [35 ]. The chi-squared value was calculated based on the formula of x2=k=1n(OkEk)2Ek , where Ok is the observed count of the cell k and Ek is the expected count of the same cell. The significance threshold was set to 0.05. One-way ANOVA with post-Tukey multiple comparison tests (GraphPad Prism 4.03) was used to analyze the Gsr protein levels in subcellular fractions. Two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post hoc test (GraphPad Prism 4.03) was used to analyze the ABR thresholds, losses of SGN, thickness of stria vascularis, and cochleogram. Student’s t-test was used to analyze the body weight, antioxidant enzyme activities, oxidative damage markers, and GSH/GSSG.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Survival Analysis of Treatment in Mouse and Human Subjects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In mouse experiments, survival was calculated from the date of hydrodynamic tail-vein injection to death. It was assumed that treatment would prolong the survival of treated mice. The association between survival and the investigated treatment was represented using Kaplan-Meier plots and assessed by log-rank tests. For human patients survival was calculated from initiation of sorafenib treatment and survival time was censored for patients who did not experience the investigated event, i.e. were alive at last contact. p-Mapk14 (Thr180/Tyr182) and p-Atf2 (Thr71) expression were dichotomized based on the median. The association between survival and expression was represented using Kaplan-Meier plots and compared by log-rank tests. Statistical analyses were implemented using Graph Pad Prism 4.03. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Other statistical analyses were performed using two-tailed Student’s t-test (using Graph Pad Prism 4.03 software, if not otherwise stated). P-values <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Biological Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Graph Pad Prism 4.0 Software (San Diego, CA, USA) was used to construct graphs and analyze data in all figures, except Fig 6F, 6H and S9F, which were performed in Excel 2010 (Microsoft). Specific statistical tests were used to evaluate the significance of differences between groups (the test and p value are indicated in the figure legend). Outliers were determined using Grubbs' test (Graph Pad Prism 4.0 Software). The sample size is indicated in the figure legend and the sample size estimation and the power of the statistical test were computed using GPower software. Samples were allocated into experimental groups by randomization. The number of independent experiments (biological replicates) is indicated in the figure legends when applicable. The survival rate of treated embryos was compared with that of the control embryos using the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Corneal Pathology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis of corneal pathology scores, bacterial burden, and cytokine levels were either by Mann-Whitney U-test for pair-wise comparisons or the Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric ANOVA with Dunn's correction for Multigroup comparisons and individual 2-group comparisons (Prism 4.0 for Macintosh). Differences were considered significant if the p < 0.05 (Prism 4.0 for Macintosh).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Tumor Burden Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results are presented as means (± SD) of at least three independent experiments. All data sets were analyzed employing one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test using the Prism 4.0 software. In all bar graphs, means without a common letter differ (p < 0.05). Average tumor burden and multiplicity were compared between treatment groups employing Mann-Whitney nonparametric statistical analysis using the Prism 4.0 software
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

UV-Induced Skin Tumorigenesis Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All results are presented as means: ± SD of at least three independent experiments (n≥3), unless indicated otherwise. Data were analyzed employing analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s post hoc test using the Prism 4.0 software; means without a common letter differ from each other (p<0.05). In the UV-induced skin tumorigenesis model, tumor multiplicity was compared between treatment groups employing Mann-Whitney nonparametric statistical analysis using the Prism 4.0 software (p < 0.05; 95% confidence interval).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Postoperative Pain Assessment in Dogs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data distribution was assessed using (JMP Pro 11; SAS Institute Inc). Normally distributed data were compared using two tail unpaired t-test (body weight, propofol dose, HR, SAP, VAS score and CSU acute pain score). Data that were not normally distributed was compared using Mann-Whitney test (age, anaesthesia duration, surgery duration, RR, expired isoflurane concentration and post-operative appetite). Statistical significance difference between groups was considered when p≤0.05 and statistical comparisons were performed using a statistical software (GraphPad, Prism 4.00 Software). A Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated between the 3 investigators who assessed postoperative pain (GraphPad, Prism 4.00 Software).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Comparisons in Cell Experiments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical comparisons between experiments performed in cells from healthy controls and repeat experiments with cells from the two patients were performed by calculating the Mann Whitney U-test using Prism Graphpad 4.0 software. Statistically significant differences obtained in intergroup comparisons were confirmed by Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance using Prism Graphpad 4.0 software. Values of p < 0.05 were considered as significant, (ns statistically not significant, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Comparison of Research Groups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical comparison between two study groups was performed by calculating the Mann-Whitney U-test using Prism Graphpad 4.0 software. Statistically significant differences obtained in intergroup comparisons were confirmed by Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance using Prism Graphpad 4.0 software. Statistical evaluation of correlation was performed by calculating Spearman's rank correlation. Values of p<0.05 were considered as significant, (ns statistically not significant, * pࣘ0.05, ** pࣘ0.01, *** pࣘ0.001, **** pࣘ0.0001)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Lm MC4R Receptor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SPSS19.0 software was used to calculate the mean and standard error of the mean (S.E.M.) of gene expression results and results are presented as mean ± S.E.M. Significant differences of gene expression were determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Duncan's multiple range test with the significance level set at P < 0.05. GraphPad Prism 4.0 software (San Diego, CA, USA) was used to calculate the ligand binding and cAMP signaling parameters such as maximal binding (Bmax) and IC50 of ligand binding and maximal response (Rmax) and EC50 of cAMP signaling. The significance of differences in Bmax, IC50, Rmax and EC50 between LmMC4R and hMC4R were determined by Student's t-test by GraphPad Prism 4.0 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!