The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pd 10 desalting column

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany, Denmark, China, Switzerland, Belgium, Japan

The PD-10 desalting column is a laboratory equipment used for the separation and purification of biomolecules. It functions by removing salts, buffer components, or other small molecular weight substances from protein or nucleic acid samples, allowing for the recovery of the desired macromolecules in a purified form.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

710 protocols using pd 10 desalting column

1

Cysteine-Dependent Peroxidase Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine whether the peroxidase activity is cysteine-dependent, rPbPrx1 (2 mg mL−1) was treated with DTT for 1 h at room temperature. The excess DTT was removed by gel filtration using a PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, USA). The reduced protein was incubated in 1 mM N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) (Sigma, München, Germany) overnight at 4°C. The excess NEM was removed by gel filtration using a PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, USA). N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) is an alkylating reagent that reacts with sulfhydryl groups, thus blocking the Prx activity. The reactions were performed at 30°C in a solution containing 50 mM Hepes-NaOH (pH 7.4), 100 μM DTPA, 1 mM sodium azide, 12.5 μM rPbPrx1, 10 mM DTT, and 5 mM t-BOOH. The peroxidase activity was monitored by the DTT oxidation (λ = 310 nm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ubiquitin Dimerization via Disulfide Conjugation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ubiquitin G76C mutant was reduced with 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (Nacalai Tesque) and then buffer-exchanged into 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.5 using a PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare). The reduced ubiquitin mutant was mixed with a 20-fold molar excess of 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB, Tokyo Chemical Industry) and then incubated for ~2 hours at room temperature with linear shaking. The reaction solution was buffer exchanged into ligation buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM NaCl and 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.0) using a PD-10 desalting column. The reduced ubiquitin mutant was mixed with a 2-fold molar excess of the DTNB-activated ubiquitin mutant in which a disulfide bond had been established between the thiol groups of DTNB and the C-terminal cysteine of the ubiquitin G76C mutant; subsequently, this solution was incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with linear shaking. After residual DTNB was removed using a PD-10 desalting column, the resultant disulfide-conjugated diubiquitin (Ub2S-S) was separated from DTNB-activated and/or reduced ubiquitin mutants in 50 mM sodium phosphate and 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.0 by using a Hiload 16/60 Superdex 75 pg size exclusion column (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

NMR Spectroscopy of AnFld and Spy Interaction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The [1H-15N]–TROSY HSQC NMR spectra of AnFld WT and the 2A mutant were recorded using Watergate solvent suppression at 25 °C on a Bruker 600 MHz spectrometer equipped with the (1H/19F)-X broadband CryoProbe Prodigy. [U-15N]-labeled proteins were exchanged into NMR sample buffer (50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) containing 0.1 M NaCl) using a PD10 desalting column (GE Healthcare). The samples were 0.2 mM of protein dissolved in a mixture of 90% (v/v) NMR sample buffer (in 1H2O) and 10% (v/v) 2H2O. The spectra were acquired using a total of 2048 complex points in t2 and 512 increments in t1 with 8 scans per increment over a spectral width of 9.6 and 2.1 kHz in the 1H and 15N dimensions, respectively. To study the interaction of AnFld and Spy, [U-2H, 15N, 13C]-labeled AnFld and Spy were exchanged into 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) without any salt using a PD10 desalting column (GE Healthcare). 15N-TROSY spectra were collected at 25 °C with 0.2 mM AnFld dissolved in 90% (v/v) buffer (in 1H2O) and 10% (v/v) D2O and then titrations were done by addition of appropriate volume of Spy to the NMR tube. A total of 2048 data points in t2 dimension and 256 increments in t1 with 16 scans per increment were acquired. The spectra were processed using NMRPipe suite, analyzed, and plotted in NMRFAM Sparky53 (link),54 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fluorescent Dye Labeling and Doxorubicin Loading in Ferritin Nanocages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For labelling of uorescence dyes, FTn/FTn variants were reacted with 30 molar equivalents of Cy5-NHS ester or Cy5.5-NHS ester (Lumiprobe) at 4°C for 12 hours in PBS solution (pH 8.0), and then the mixture was puri ed with a PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare). Typically, the conjugated dye number on each nanocage was calculated as 6-8 by determining the concentration of dyes and FTn/FTn variants.
FTn possesses a natural drug entry channel that exists on the shell, which facilitates the direct loading of small molecular drugs into the core. Dox was loaded into FTn and its variants according to our previously reported method 32 (link) . Brie y, 8 mg FTn/FTn variants was reacted with 3 mg Dox at 60°C for 4 hours in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0), and then centrifugated at 12,000 rpm for 10 minutes to separate the supernatant, the mixture was then puri ed with a PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare) to remove free Dox. The concentration of protein and Dox complexes were measured by the BCA method and the speci c absorbance of Dox at 480 nm, respectively. The number of loaded Dox in each nanocage was calculated based on the protein concentration and Dox concentration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Purification of Virus-Like Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Infiltrated leaf tissue was weighed and homogenized using a Waring (Torrington, CT) blender with 3× volume of extraction buffer (0.1 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.0) plus added protease inhibitor (Roche, Welwyn Garden City, UK) and then filtered through Miracloth (Calbiochem). The crude extract was centrifuged at 9500 × g for 15 min at 4 °C following filtration over a 0.45 µm syringe filter (Sartorius). The clarified extract was then spun through a sucrose cushion (1 ml 70% (w/v) and 5 ml 25% (w/v)) at 167,000 × g for 3 h at 4 °C and the lower fraction retrieved. Sucrose was removed by dialysis using PD10 desalting columns (GE Healthcare) and the volume of the sample reduced using Amicon Centrifugal Filter Units (Millipore). The sample was further purified by centrifugation through a Nycodenz (Axis-Shield) gradient (20–60% (w/v)) in a TH641 ultracentrifuge swing-out rotor (Sorvall) at 247,103 × g for 24 h and 4 °C. VLPs were collected by piercing the side of the tube with a needle and PD10 desalting columns (GE Healthcare) were used to remove the Nycodenz and the samples concentrated using Amicon Centrifugal Filter Units (Millipore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Purification of Get4/Get5 Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
pET28a-His6-Get4 and pETcoco2-Get5 were transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) and expression was induced at 25 °C with 2 mM isopropyl-β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside. The His6Get4/Get5 complex was then purified using Ni-NTA super flow beads according to the manufacturer’s manual under native conditions (QIAGEN) (Supplementary Fig. 4i). Purified His6Get4/Get5 was transferred to Hepes buffer (20 mM Hepes/KOH pH 7.4, 2 mM Mg(OAc)2, 120 mM KOAc, 5% glycerol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF)) using PD-10 desalting columns (GE Healthcare) and was then employed in the experiments shown in Figs. 4 and 5. Get4/His6Get5 was expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) from plasmid pETDuet-His6Get5-Get4. Purification of Get4/His6Get5 of was performed using HisTrap HP affinity chromatography (GE Healthcare) followed by size-exclusion chromatography (Superdex 200 10/300 GE Healthcare). Purified Get4/His6Get5 was transferred to 50 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 70 mM NH4Cl, 30 mM KCl, 7 mM MgCl2 buffer using PD-10 desalting columns (GE Healthcare) prior to fluorescent labeling for anisotropy and FCS measurements shown in Fig. 1. Purified proteins were stored at −80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Purification of Flag-UL42 and His-Impα4 Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eight 75 cm2 flasks of HEK293T cells were transfected with pCMV-Flag–UL42, pCMV-Flag–UL42ΔNLS, or pCAGGS-His–Impα4, as described above, with 10 μg of plasmid in each flask. The cells were collected 24 h after transfection, washed twice with PBS, and lysed with Triton X-100 buffer containing 1 mM PMSF. After clarification by centrifugation, the cell lysates were subjected directly to the protein purification procedure. Flag–UL42 and Flag–UL42ΔNLS were purified with Anti-DYKDDDDK G1 Affinity Resin (GenScript, Piscataway, NJ), according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The purified proteins were eluted with 3 M NaCl buffer (pH 7.4), and subsequently desalted with PD-10 Desalting Columns (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden), with transport buffer (TB; described in the section “Nuclear import assays”) as the elution buffer. His–Impα4 was purified with Anti-His Affinity Resin (GenScript), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The purified His–Impα4 fusion protein was eluted with alkaline elution buffer [0.1 M Tris (pH 12.0), 0.5 M NaCl], and 50 μl of 1 M HCl was added per milliliter of eluate. The eluate was then subjected to buffer exchange with TB using PD-10 Desalting Columns (GE Healthcare). All three purified proteins were stored at –80°C until analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Liposome-Based Membrane Protein Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The liposome contained PC 58%, PE 20%, PS 20%: PI(4,5)P2 2% was prepared as described before (Yang et al., 2015 (link)). The detergent was removed by PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare) in buffer 25 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 150 mM KCl. Increasing concentrations of SN25 (1–206) or (11–206) (5–20 µM) were incubated with 5 µM Rph3A FL in the presence of 0.4 mM liposome with 0.5 mM Ca2+ at room temperature for 30 min. Mixtures were centrifuged with 20,000×g for 1 hr at 4°C. The supernatant (S) was acquired and the precipitate (P) was resuspended with equal volume buffer 25 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 150 mM KCl. Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and the protein bands were detected by Coomassie blue staining. Each experiment was repeated at least three times. Data were analyzed by ImageJ and Prism 8.0.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Recombinant Protein Expression in E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We transformed the expression vector into E. coli Rosetta cells (Novagen, Madison, WI, USA) for protein expression. Firstly, transformed Rosetta cells with a recombinant vector (100 mL) were incubated at 37 °C and 200 rpm until the OD600 was 0.5. Next, 0.1 mM IPTG was added to the bacterial fluid, which was then kept at 18 °C and 200 rpm for 16 h, and finally cells were collected after centrifugation at 10,000× g for 5 min at 4 °C. After resuspending the precipitate in 25 mM, pH 7.4 Tris-HCl buffer, the mixture was disrupted by sonication for 15 min and then centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and filtered. Ni-NTA bind resin (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) was used to purify the supernatant, and the partially purified protein was then purified through a PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). The protein was finally eluted with Tris-HCl (25 mM, pH 7.4) for further study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Recombinant Protein Purification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protein ORFs were cloned into vector pET30a at the BamHI and XhoI sites with an N-terminal His-tag. The recombinant plasmids were transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3). The recombinant E. coli was grown in LB at 30°C with shaking until OD600 nm reached about 0.6. When isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added, the final concentration was 0.2 mM, and the cells were further cultivated at 16°C for 20 h. Cells were harvested via centrifugation, washed twice with ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, and 20 mM imidazole, pH 8.0), and broken through the high pressure crusher SPCH-18 (STANSTED). Cells were removed via centrifugation and the supernatant was loaded onto the nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) agarose resin (Invitrogen). The resin was washed with 5 column volumes (CV) of resuspension buffer, and added the His-tagged protein with an elution buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, and 250 mM imidazole, pH 8.0). The eluted fractions with the c were loaded onto a PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare) for buffer exchange (25 mM Hepes, 300 mM NaCl, and 10% glycerol, pH 8.0). Dithiothreitol (1 mM) was added into the resuspension buffer. Purity of the proteins was analyzed by SDS-PAGE.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!