The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

33 protocols using bsrgi

1

Plasmid Construction for dTomato-Centrin1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The plasmid pdTomato-centrin1 was created by excising the EGFP coding sequence from pEGFP-centrin1 with the restriction enzymes Age I and BsrG I (New England Biolabs) and replacing it with the dTomato coding sequence, which was amplified by PCR using Phusion DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific) from pRSET-B-dTomato (Roger Tsien) using primers to incorporate Age I and BsrG I restriction sites at the 5′ and 3′ end of the PCR product, respectively. Sequencing of the dTomato coding sequence was carried out to verify the fidelity of the amplifying enzyme.
The plasmid pEGFP-N1-ACTR3 40 (link) to express EGFP-Arp3 was obtained from Addgene (#8462).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Intergenerational Profiling of DAF-21 Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Male P0 worms homozygous for the daf-21p::mCherry array where crossed to P0 hermaphrodites carrying the daf-21p::mCherry array in addition to either a wt [denoted as div-1(+)] or mutant div-1(or148) allele. Expression was quantified in these P0 hermaphrodites. F1 hermaphrodite progeny were picked at the L4 stage to separate plates and allowed to self. After 3 days, single F2 progeny L4 hermaphrodites were transferred to separate wells. Two days later, the adult worms were removed (leaving multiple laid F3 embryos and larvae in the well) and genotyped using PCR (forward primer, gaacggagcacttgggaaga; reverse primer, tgttcgtgggaccaatgaga), followed by 1-hour restriction digest with Bsr GI (New England Biolabs), cutting only the div-1(or148) allele product. F3 progeny of F2 worms identified as wt were subsequently followed and analyzed for expression of mCherry for several generations. All worms were picked and handled at a standard dissecting microscope with no fluorescence to avoid any biases. At each generation, mean fluorescence intensity in day-1 adults was used as a readout. We normalized the expression of div-1 descendants to the median expression of descendants of wt worms propagated in parallel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Enzymatic Digestion Protocol Optimization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
REs (NcoI, BtgI, XbaI, NdeI, NheI, BmtI, BamHI, XcmI, PflMI, BstEII, NcoI, HpaI, BbsI, BsgI, AfeI, BstXI, StuI, BsrGI, and EcoRI, accompanied with respective buffers) were from New England Biolabs (NEB). Another NdeI (accompanied with H buffer), and recombinant DNase I (RNase-free) were from Takara-Bio. Another NcoI (accompanied with H buffer) and DNase I were from Nippon Gene. Hi-Lo DNA marker was from Bionexus. DNA primers were synthesized by Thermo Fisher Scientific. Other chemicals were from FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation unless otherwise noted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RNAi Knockdown of sigX in P. plecoglossicida

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNAi strain was constructed according to methods described by Choi and Schweizer (8 (link)) and Darsigny et al. (9 (link)). Five short hairpin RNA sequences targeting the sigX gene were designed and synthesized by Shanghai Generay Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) (Table S1 in Supplementary Material). After linearizing pCM130/tac vectors with the restriction enzymes NsiI and BsrGI (New England Biolabs, USA), the oligonucleotides were annealed and ligated to the linearized pCM130/tac vectors using T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. The recombinant pCM130/tac vectors were transformed into the competent E. coli DH5a cells by heat shock and then were extracted and electroporated into P. plecoglossicida as described previously (10 (link)). Finally, the expression level of sigX of each RNAi strain was detected by qRT-PCR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Constructing dksA RNAi strains in P. plecoglossicida

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The RNAi strains were constructed according to Sun et al. (2018) (link). Five short hairpin RNA sequences targeting the dksA gene were designed using the RNAi website (http://rnaidesigner.thermofisher.com/rnaiexpress/setOption.do?designOption=shrna&pid=708587103220684543), and then synthesized by Shanghai Generay Biotech Co., Ltd. (China) (Supplementary Table S1). Each oligonucleotide was annealed and ligated to the pCM130/tac vector linearized with the restriction enzymes NsiI and BsrGI (New England Biolabs, USA) using T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs, USA) (Guo et al., 2018 (link)). The preparation of E. coli DH5α competent cells was performed by the CaCl2 method (Mandel & Higa, 1970 (link)). The recombinant pCM130/tac vector was transformed into competent E. coli DH5α by heat shock, and then extracted for electroporating into P. plecoglossicida competent cells (Tang et al., 2019b (link)). Finally, the expression of dksA in five dksA-RNAi strains of P. plecoglossicida was verified by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

RNAi Knockdown in Photobacterium

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNAi strain was constructed according to previously described methods (5 (link)). Five short hairpin RNA sequences targeting htpG, rplF, and flgD were designed and synthesized by Shanghai Generay Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) (Table S1). After linearizing pCM130/tac vectors with the restriction enzymes NsiI and BsrGI (New England Biolabs, U.S.A), the oligonucleotides were annealed and ligated to the linearized pCM130/tac vectors using T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs) based on the manufacturer's recommendations. The recombinant pCM130/tac vectors were transformed into competent E. coli DH5a cells by heat shock, and then extracted and electroporated into P. plecoglossicida. Finally, the expression level of the target gene of each RNAi strain was evaluated by qRT-PCR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Constructing Cry2-Dopamine Transporter Fusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All plasmids were obtained from Addgene. The DAT was cloned into the Cry2–mCh plasmid to express Cry2–mCh at the N terminus of the DAT to ensure proper function because cloning of N-terminal–expressing YFP and FLAG to generate YFP–DAT and FLAG–DAT resulted in normal DAT function (12 (link), 35 (link), 38 (link)). The Cry2PHR–mCh (Addgene) vector was digested with BsrgI and NotI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA). The DAT sequence was amplified from YFPsynDAT (Addgene), with flanking ends complementary to BsrgI (5′- TGA CCA TTG AAA CGG TAC CAC CAT GAG CAA GT-3′) and NotI (5′- TGC AAC TGC GGC CGC TCT CTT CAC ACC TTC AGC CAG T- 3′) sequences. DAT amplification products were isolated by gel electrophoresis and ligated into the digested Cry2–mCh vector using the Quick Ligation kit (New England Biolabs). The sequence was verified by sequencing and allele-specific polymerase chain reaction. Cry2–mCh–DAT (hereafter referred to as Cry2–DAT)–transformed DH5-alpha bacteria were cultured to propagate and isolate plasmids. We then isolated the plasmids by using Qiagen midiprep kit (Qiagen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

DRIP Assay for Detecting R-Loops

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DRIP was performed according to a previously published protocol17 (link). In brief, DNA from a nearly confluent 10-cm dish was obtained using proteinase K followed by phenol/chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. DNA was subjected to overnight digestion using a cocktail of restriction enzymes (HindIII, EcoRI, BsrGI, XbaI and SspI, NEB). After being cleaned up with phenol/chloroform/ethanol, 4 μg digested DNA with or without RNaseH pre-treatment was used as input for immunoprecipitation using S9.6 antibody (Kerafast). The DNA–antibody complex was incubated for 16 h and allowed to bind protein A/G beads for a further 4 h. Bound DNA fragments were recovered in the elution buffer by incubating with proteinase K at 55 °C for 45 min. Recovered DNA was cleaned using phenol/chloroform/ethanol and resuspended in 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0. Each immunoprecipitation was run in triplicate and samples were pooled for sequencing after sonication.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of DNA Resection Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The percentage of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA%) generated by resection was measured as previously described (34 (link),35 (link)). Briefly, ER-AsiSI U2OS cells were treated with 5 μM 4-OHT for 4 h, and then genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted with genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Tiangen Biotech,Beijing China). After that, 500 ng genomic DNA sample was digested or mock digested with 20 units of restriction enzymes BsrGI (New England Biolabs) at 37°C overnight. 1 μl DNA were used as templates in 10 μl of qPCR reaction containing 5 μl of 2× PerfectStart II Probe qPCR SupperMix (TransGen Biotech,Beijing, China), 0.2 μM of each primer and 0.2 μM probe. The sequences of qPCR primers and probes are shown in Supplementary Table S2. The ssDNA% generated by resection at selected sites was calculated with the following equation: ssDNA% = 1/(2^(△Ct –1) + 0.5) × 100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying DNA End Resection at DSBs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
End resection was assayed in ER-AsiSI cells that were predominantly in S/G2 phase by cell synchronization procedure mentioned earlier in the Methods section. The extent of resection adjacent to specific DSBs was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) as described previously [24 (link)]. The sequences of qPCR primers are shown in S1 Table. 20μL of genomic DNA sample (~200 ng in 1x CutSmart NEB restriction enzyme buffer) was digested or mock digested with 20 units of restriction enzymes (NmeAIII, AvaI, BsrGI, BamHI-HF or HindIII-HF; New England Biolabs) at 37°C overnight. 5 μl of digested or mock digested samples (~20 ng) were used as templates in 20 μl of qPCR reaction containing 10 μl of 2x iTaqUniversal SYBR Green Supermix, 500 nM of each primer using iCycler iQReal-Time PCR (Bio-Rad). The % ssDNA generated by resection at selected sites was determined as previously described [24 (link)]. Briefly, for each sample, a ΔCt was calculated by subtracting the Ct value of the mock-digested sample from the Ct value of the digested sample. The % ssDNA was calculated using algorithm: ssDNA% = 1/(2^(ΔCt-1) + 0.5)*100 [24 (link)]. Data represent the mean of at least three independent experiments with SD values indicated by error bars.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!