The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Express 35s protein labeling mix

Manufactured by PerkinElmer
Sourced in United States, Italy

The EXPRESS 35S Protein Labeling Mix is a laboratory reagent designed for the in vitro labeling of proteins with the radioactive isotope 35S-methionine. It provides a convenient and efficient way to incorporate 35S-methionine into newly synthesized proteins for downstream applications such as protein analysis and detection.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

23 protocols using express 35s protein labeling mix

1

Protein Secretion Quantification in OI Fibroblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
OI patients' fibroblasts were plated in 24 well plate and after 5 days without changing the medium were labeled with 5 uCi/ml [35S] EXPRESS35S Protein Labeling Mix (PerkinElmer) in D-MEM without l-methionine, l-cystine, and l-glutamine for 1 h at 37 °C. Total proteins from medium and cell layer were precipitated with 10% trichloroacetic acid. Proteins were washed with acetone twice and resuspended in 60 mM Tris HCl, pH 6.8, 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate. The radioactivity (counts for minute, CPM) of the samples was measured using a liquid scintillation analyzer (TRI-CARB 2300 TR). The percentage of protein secretion was calculated based on the ratio between the CPM in the media and the CPM in medium and cell layer, evaluated in 5 technical replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Detailed Antibody and Reagent Information

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All primary and secondary antibodies used in this study, including information about the target, species, dilutions and sources, are documented in Supplementary Table S4. THZ1 was purchased from MedChem Express (Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA); palbociclib, from Selleck Chemicals (Houston, TX, USA); Caspase 3/7 Glo assays, from Promega (Madison, WI, USA); and ViaLight proliferation assays, from Lonza (Basel, Switzerland). Annexin V FACS kits, FxCycle PI/RNase staining solution, TaqMan pre-optimized RT–qPCR gene expression assays, Superscript III reverse transcription kits, Platinum PCR SuperMix, SYBR Safe DNA stain and Diamond antifade mounting medium with DAPI were purchased from Life Technologies. RNA miniprep kits and DNAse kits were purchased from Qiagen (Venlo, Netherlands); Matrigel, from Corning (Corning, NY, USA); emetine and actinomycin D, from Sigma Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA); and EXPRESS 35S Protein Labeling Mix, from Perkin Elmer (Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Analyzing ATF6 Disulfide Status

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wild‐type and ERp18 KO HEK293T cells stably overexpressing ATF6 were incubated in medium lacking methionine and cysteine for 30 min and pulse‐labeled for 30 min with 22 μCi/ml of EXPRESS35S Protein Labeling Mix (PerkinElmer). The cells were rinsed twice in PBS to remove the radiolabel and then incubated in complete medium to initiate the chase periods. Subsequently, cells were washed twice with PBS supplemented with 20 mM NEM and lysed in cell lysis buffer containing 20 mM NEM. Samples were subject to centrifugation at 16,000 × g at 4°C to obtain the post‐nuclear supernatant. ATF6α immunoisolation was carried out as described above using anti‐ATF6 (Abcam). Samples were separated under non‐reducing and reducing SDS–PAGE gels, fixed, dried, and exposed to a phosphorimager plate for 72 h. Radioactivity was detected using a Fujifilm FLA‐7000 Phosphorimager.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Recombinant Protein Expression in E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All proteins were expressed in E. coli strain BL21 (DE3) transformed with appropriate plasmid vectors. A. tumefaciens ClpS1, ClpS2, and ClpA ORFs were amplified from A. tumefaciens GV3101 (a gift from Mary Gehring, Whitehead Institute/MIT and Graham Walker, MIT) by colony PCR. S. elongatus ClpS1 and ClpS2 were amplified from S. elongatus Strain PCC 7942 genomic DNA (ATCC) using standard molecular biology techniques. The ClpS1 and ClpS2 ORFs were inserted into a pET23b vector at the C-terminus of H6-SUMO. ClpA was inserted into pET23b with a C-terminal H6 tag. For 35S-lableled proteins, E. coli Bl21 cultures expressing the desired protein were grown at 37°C in LB to OD600 = 1, centrifuged, resuspended in M9 medium + 10% LB broth, supplemented with EXPRESS [35S]-protein labeling mix (Perkin Elmer) and grown for 4 h. Western blotting experiments were performed using A. tumefaciens strain GV3101.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Circadian Clock Protein Turnover

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The half-lives of transfected FLAG epitope-tagged circadian clock proteins (BMAL1, PER2 and CRY1) in the absence (as a control) and presence of siRNAs targeting COPS7B were measured by metabolic pulse chase protein labeling according to the protocol of Zhou et al. Briefly, 72 hr post-transfection, 100 mm plates of HEK293T cells were starved of amino acids for 1 hr and metabolically labeled for 30 min with 100 μCi of Express-35S protein-labeling mix (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Schwerzenbach, CH) in 1 ml methionine- and cysteine-free DMEM medium supplemented with 10% dialysed FCS (‘the pulse’). Sunsequently, cells were washed to remove unbound radioactive amino acids, and incubated in complete medium (‘the chase’). At indicated time points (0, 2, 4, and 6 hr), the cells were disrupted in ice-cold RIPA lysis buffer (0.02M Tris/pH7.2, 0.15M NaCl, 1% Trion X-100, 1% Na-deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS), and 1000 μg of whole cell extract were immunoprecipitated with Monoclonal ANTI-FLAG M2 Antibody from Sigma (F3165). Proteins were subjected to 9% SDS-PAGE and the gels were dried for 2 hr at 80°C by Model 583 gel dryer (BIO-RAD, Hercules, CA). Labeled proteins were visualized by autoradiography and quantitative analysis of three independent experiments for each circadian clock protein was performed with ImageStudio software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Metabolic Labeling and Fractionation of HEK293 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293 cells (0.75 × 106/well) were plated on polylysine-coated (0.15mg/ml) six-well plates and transiently transfected with 2 µg of indicated plasmids using 5 µl Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). For metabolic labeling, cells were incubated in cysteine- and methionine-free media with 10% dialyzed FBS for 30 min. Then, cells were labeled with 80 µCi/ml Express35S Protein Labeling Mix (PerkinElmer; #NEG072014MC) for 30 min, unless otherwise indicated in the figure legends. Cells were rinsed with 1× PBS and chased with complete DMEM medium supplemented with 2 mM methionine and 2 mM cysteine. The labeled cells were directly harvested in 1 ml RIPA buffer for Figs. 1 G and 4 A and immunoprecipitated using anti-FLAG beads. For Figs. 1 E, 4 E, 6 C, and S2 A, labeled cells were permeabilized with 0.01% to 0.015% digitonin and fractionated into cytosol and membrane fractions, as described above, and immunoprecipitated using anti-FLAG beads. The immunoprecipitants were analyzed by SDS-PAGE autoradiography.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Pulse-Chase Analysis of Protein Trafficking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pulse chase experiments were used to monitor secretion of the bulk flow marker SP-FLAG-Cp and intracellular transport of Gas1, CPY, and the misfolded form of CPY, CPY*. These experiments were performed as previously described (Pagant et al., 2007 (link)). Briefly, strains were grown to mid-log phase at 30°C, starved for 15 min, and labeled for 5 min with 1 µl per OD of cells of EXPRESS 35S Protein Labeling Mix (PerkinElmer) for 5 or 10 min. The label was chased with excess rich media and two OD aliquots of cells harvested at different times. Cells were lysed in detergent, and the protein of interest was immunoprecipitated from cell lysates, and cell media (when measuring SP-FLAG-Cp secretion) were separated by SDS-PAGE and detected by phosphorimaging using a Typhoon scanner (GE Healthcare). The protein bands were quantified using Fiji, and the percentage of the mature or secreted band in each sample was plotted with Prism 7.0 (GraphPad Software).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Radiolabeling and Immunoprecipitation of PrxIV

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were starved for 30 min in cysteine/methionine-free DMEM and then radiolabeled in the same medium containing 22 μCi/ml EXPRESS35S protein labeling mix (PerkinElmer Life Sciences). After 30 min of incubation at 37 °C, the radiolabel was removed, and cells were washed with PBS and incubated in complete DMEM for various lengths of time. Cells were washed with PBS before being lysed in buffer A. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation (10,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C). The lysates were precleared by adding protein A-Sepharose (Generon) and incubated for 30 min at 4 °C. For immunoisolation, anti-PrxIV antibody was added to protein A-Sepharose. Samples were incubated for 16 h at 4 °C with end-over-end mixing. The Sepharose beads were pelleted by centrifugation (600 × g for 1 min) and washed three times with buffer A. Proteins were eluted with IEF sample buffer prior to loading onto a one-dimensional IEF gel. Gels were fixed, dried, and exposed to a phosphorimaging plate. Radioactivity was detected using a Fujifilm FLA-7000 PhosphorImager. Quantification of band intensities was carried out using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Measuring Protein Synthesis Inhibition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293T cells (500,000 cells/ml) were plated in 12-well flat bottom culture cluster dishes (Costar, Fisher Scientific) 24 hr before the experiment. IPA (1 μM), or a combination of IPA with GSK2606414 (TRC inc. Toronto Canada), were added to the cells culture for no longer than 2 hr. 15 min prior to lysing cells, 4 μCi of Express [35S] protein-labeling mix (Perkin–Elmer) was added. Media were removed, and cells were immediately lysed in a buffer containing 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 8 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 1% Triton X-100, 15% glycerol, 10 mM leupeptin, 153 μM aprotenin, and 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride. Cells lysates were kept on ice for 30 min before high-speed centrifugation followed by denaturation at 95°C. The samples were resolved on an SDS-polyacrylamide gel, which were then stained with Coomassie blue to ascertain protein loading. Dry gels were exposed to a blank phosphorscreen and scanned using a Typhoon variable mode imager (GE Healthcare). The resulting autoradiograms were quantified using ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Monitoring Intracellular Protein Trafficking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pulse‐chase experiments were used to monitor intracellular transport of Gas1 and CPY and to monitor Sec23 and Sec24 degradation. These experiments were performed as previously described.23 Briefly, strains were grown to mid‐log phase at 30°C, starved for 15 minutes, and labeled for 5 minutes with 1 μL per OD of cells of EXPRESS 35S Protein Labeling Mix (PerkinElmer) for 5 minutes. The label was chased with excess rich media and 2 OD aliquots of cells harvested at different times. Cells were lysed in detergent and the protein of interest was immunoprecipitated from cell lysates, separated by SDS‐PAGE, and detected by phosphorimaging using a Typhoon scanner (GE Healthcare). The protein bands were quantified using Fiji and the percentage of the mature band in each sample was plotted with Prism 7.0 (GraphPad Software).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!