The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using ms 5973

1

GC-MS Identification of Chemical Components

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the identification of chemical components, each sample was analyzed by Agilent GC 6890N-Agilent MS 5973 equipped with HP5-MS capillary column (30m ∗ 0.25 mm; coating thickness 0.25 μm). Analytical conditions were an injector temperature of 350°C; carrier gas helium at 1 mL/min; injection mode: split, split ratio 10 : 1; volume injected: 1 μL of sample in ethanol extract; oven temperature programmed from 40°C to 350°C at 4°C/min; pressure: 48.2 kPa; and split flow: 9.9 mL/min. The MS scan conditions were a transfer line temperature of 280°C, an interface temperature of 280°C, and an ion source temperature of 230°C. Identification of the components was conducted by matching the retention times against National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST Mass Spectrometry DATA CENTER) data library, and crosscheck was applied with previously published data [15 (link), 16 ] The chemical components found to be higher than 1% were accepted as the major components, and the list of these components and information regarding them are given in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

GC-MS Analysis of Fatty Acids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An Agilent GC-MS system (GC 6890A and MS 5973) was used equipped with an HP-1MS capillary column (30 m × 250 µm i.d., 0.25µm film thickness). The GC temperature program was as follows: Initially 120 °C increased to 200 °C at a rate of 20 °C/min followed by 2 °C/min increase rate to 300 °C with a total run time of 60 min. Samples were injected at a temperature of 250 °C in splitless mode. Data were acquired by scan mode (m/z range 50–700) and selected ion monitoring (SIM). The SIM masses were as follows: Pentadecanoic acid-TBDMS = m/z 299; Heptadecanoic acid-TBDMS = m/z 327; D3-heptadecanoic acid-TBDMS = m/z 330; Phytanic acid-TBDMS = m/z 369; 2-hydroxyphytanic acid-TBDMS = m/z 499.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Analytical Techniques for Organic Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Attenuated total reflection infrared
spectroscopy, performed in a JASCO FT/IR-4000, was employed to record
the IR spectra of reaction solutions (400 to 4000 cm–1) by dropping a small sample of the solution on the ATR crystal.
Gas chromatography (GC) and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry
(GC–MS) were performed in gas chromatographs with 25 m capillary
columns filled with 1 or 5 wt % phenylsilicone (Shimadzu GC-2025,
Agilent GC 6890 N coupled with Agilent MS-5973). 1H, 13C, and 19P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra
were recorded at room temperature on a 400 MHz spectrometer (Bruker
Ascend 400).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

GC-MS Analysis of Propolis Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The GC-MS analysis of the EEP samples was performed using a 6890N gas chromatograph from Agilent (Palo Alto, CA, USA) coupled with a mass detector (MS5973, Agilent) equipped with a DB-5 MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm; film thickness: 0.25 μm). Helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1 ml/min.
Organic compounds in propolis samples were identified in the Wiley/NIST Mass Spectral Library [8 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

GC-MS Analysis of TMSO Carbohydrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The TMSO carbohydrate derivatives were analyzed in a gas chromatograph coupled to a quadrupole mass detector (Agilent GC-6890 and MS5973; Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, United States). Column, GC and MS conditions are described previously (Julio-Gonzalez et al., 2019 (link)). The identification of TMSO carbohydrate derivatives was carried out by the analysis of corresponding mass spectra and data of previously reported standards (Hernández-Hernández et al., 2011 (link)). These identifications were considered as tentative.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Ulvan Polysaccharide

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ulvan was extracted from the residue following aqueous ethanol (75%) extraction with hot water (90 °C, 1 h × 3). Ulvan was recovered by ethanol precipitation and then freeze-dried. The 13C uptake in ulvan was measured by IR-MS. Semiquantitative 13C-NMR of 13C-labelled ulvan was performed by the inverse-gated decoupling method using JEOL NMR ECA600 (150 MHz)35 (link),36 (link). Ulvan was re-solubilised in D2O-DMSO-d6 (92:8) mixed solvent. NMR spectra were recorded at 40 °C with a repetition time of 10.69206 s. The chemical shift intensities were normalised to the DMSO-d6 internal standard. The monosaccharide composition of ulvan was analysed by GC–MS (Agilent GC 8690 N and MS 5973; Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). Ulvan was hydrolysed into monosaccharides by aqueous trifluoro acetate (TFA; 2 M, 121 °C, 1 h). After removing TFA, the monosaccharides were derivatised to alditol acetate and analysed by GC–MS with a column of CBP-1 (Shimadzu GLC Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) operated at 140–160 °C (2 °C min−1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Headspace SPME-GC-MS Analysis of Terpenes and Norisoprenoids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The determination of free terpenes and C13-norisoprenoids was conducted by means of headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) in connection with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC-MS), according to the method of Câmara et al. [26 (link)] and corresponding adaptations by Brandt et al. [27 ]. The following analytical equipment was applied: a multipurpose sampler MPS 2 (Gerstel GmbH & Co. KG, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany) was used for HS-SPME injection in combination with a GC-MS-System (GC 6890 and an MS 5973 (Agilent)). HS-SPME extraction was carried out with a 1 cm SPME fiber coated with 100 µm of polydimethylsiloxane (Supelco). Aroma compound separation was performed using a 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.5 µm gas chromatography column (DB-Wax, J & W Scientific, Agilent) together with the mass spectrometer used in the SIM mode. For the instrumental control, acquisition and quantitative analysis of data, Agilent MassHunter workstation software was used. Examples of extracted ion chromatograms for TDN and linalool are provided in Supplementary Figure S1A,B.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cell Migration Area Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A migration cell with 1 dm2‐migration area was obtained from Maeda Seisakusyo (Tokyo, Japan). The centrifugal condenser CVE‐100, Tokyo Rikakiki Co. (Tokyo, Japan) and the GC/MS system comprising GC 6890 and MS 5973 (Agilent Technologies, USA) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Resin Removal Rate for CFRP Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The resin removal rate (RR) for the composite matrix was calculated based on the mass of CFs recovered at the end of each experiment, as shown below: RR=WCFRPWsWCFRP×100 where WCFRP is the mass of the CFRP composite before the start of the experiment, Ws is the mass of the RCFs collected after drying the remained solids.
The chemical composition of the liquid samples was analyzed using ATR-FTIR (ThermoFisher Scientific, Nicolet iS 10 FTIR Spectrometer) and GC-MS (Agilent Technologies, MS: 5973; GC: 6890 with 7683 autosampler). The liquid samples were preprocessed before analyzing in the GC-MS. An aliquot of 5 mL was mixed with 5 mL of dichloromethane (DCM) to extract the organic solvents present in the sample. Sodium hydroxide (ACS reagent, ≥99.0%, anhydrous, granular, Sigma Aldrich) was added to the extracted liquid to remove the water from the organic extracts. The organic compounds in the solution were identified by comparing the mass spectra with the inbuilt NIST database of the instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Analytical Characterization of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Melting points were recorded on a hot-stage microscope (Reichert, Wien, Austria, Thermovar). Precoated silica gel PET foils (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA) were used for TLC analyses. GLC-FID analyses were performed on a Dani (Milan, Italy) GC 1000 chromatograph equipped with a PTV injector, using an Agilent (Santa Clara, USA) J&W DB-1 column (15 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) and recorded with a Dani DDS 1000 data station. GLC-MS analyses were recorded with an Agilent 6890N gas chromatograph interfaced with an Agilent MS5973 mass detector, using an Agilent J&W DB-5ms (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) column. Purifications by flash chromatography were performed using Merck 60 silica gel. 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded at 400 and 100 MHz, respectively, with a Jeol (Tokyo, Japan) 400 spectrometer referring chemical shifts to the residual solvent signal. The following notation was used to report NMR spectra: s = singlet, d = doublet, dd = double doublet, t = triplet, dt = double triplet, q = quadruplet. All the commercially available reagents and solvents were used as received.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!