The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Glass econo column

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United States

The Glass Econo-Column is a versatile laboratory equipment designed for chromatographic separation and purification processes. It features a glass column with a uniform diameter and a high-quality polycarbonate top and bottom, allowing for efficient and reliable liquid chromatography applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using glass econo column

1

Purification of Alpha-1 Antitrypsin from Marmoset Plasma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Marmoset pooled plasma was diluted with a binding buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl with 50 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) at a ratio of 1:9. The diluted plasma was filtered through a 0.45-μm filter (GL Science, Japan) and added to α1-antitrypsin select resin (GE Healthcare Life Science, Tokyo, Japan), which was equilibrated with the binding buffer. For the batch purification step, the plasma with the resin was shaken at 4°C for 10 min and the resin-captured α1-PI was packed in a Glass Econo-Column (φ10 mm × 100 mm; Bio-Rad) coupled with the ÄKTA 10s system. The column was washed with the binding buffer and α1-PI contained fractions were eluted and collected in 1 ml fractions with an elution buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl with 2 M MgCl2, pH 7.4) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Purification of Recombinant chPTX3 from HEK293 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recombinant chPTX3 was purified from supernatant of stably transfected HEK293 cells using a Glass Econo-Column® (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Munich, Germany) packed with ANTI-FLAG® M2 Affinity Gel (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) and eluted from the gel matrix with 0.1 M glycin-HCl pH 3.5. The pH of the purified protein was neutralized by addition of 30 μl 1 M tris-HCl pH 8.0 per ml eluate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Purification of SPIN1/SPIN4 Fusion Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
WT SPIN1, WT SPIN4, or mutant SPIN4 coding sequence were cloned into pSecTag plasmid containing a secretary peptide sequence so that the expressed proteins are secreted into the culture media. An antibody Fc region was inserted at the carboxyl terminus, connected with a G4S linker (38 (link)) to allow protein purification using protein A resin (GenScript) as previously described (39 (link)). Briefly, protein A resin slurry (1–5 mL) was packed into a glass Econo-column (Bio-Rad) and equilibrated with 50 mL of binding/washing buffer (0.15M NaCl, 20 mM Na2HPO4 [pH 8.0]). Four to 6 days after transfection, Expi293 cells were spun down, and the culture media containing the expressed protein was loaded onto the column. After unbound proteins were washed away with binding/washing buffer, SPIN1 or SPIN4-Fc fusion proteins were eluted with 30 mL of elution buffer (100 mM acetic acid [pH 3.0]), neutralized by 1/10 volume of neutralization buffer (1M Tris-HCl [pH 9.0]), concentrated, and buffer-exchanged to PBS using Amicon Ultra-15 filter unit (MilliporeSigma). The purity of the antibodies was checked by SDS-PAGE, and the concentration was determined by Nanodrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Purification of Recombinant WARS Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
WARS2 wild-type and WARS2(L53F) mutant proteins were prepared and purified by Genscript using the Baculovirus expression system. Recombinant WARS was prepared in house using an overnight Rosetta (Novagen) culture transformed with pEX-N-GST-WARS diluted in 1 L Luria-Bertani broth, shaking at 180 r.p.m. at 37 °C. Protein expression was induced with 1 mM IPTG and incubated at 16 °C for 16 h. The induced culture was harvested by centrifugation at 5,000g for 15 min, followed by resuspension in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 1% triton, 25% glycerol, 1 mg ml−1 lysozyme, 1 mM DTT and complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche)) followed with sonication. The lysate was cleared by centrifugation and the supernatant mixed with 2 ml of glutathione sepharose 4B resin (GE Healthcare) and resuspended in buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 25% glycerol, 1 mM DTT). The mixture was then applied to a glass econo-column (BioRad) and resin-bound WARS washed and then eluted in fractions of 2 ml elution buffer (50 mM Tris pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 25% glycerol, 20 mM of L-glutathione reduced (Sigma) and 1 mM DTT). Fractions were run on SDS–PAGE gel and stained with Coomassie blue to check for purity and pure fractions pooled and buffer exchanged with 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol and 0.005% P20.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Purification of Lactic Acid Bacteria Oligosaccharides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The oligosaccharides produced by L. lactis CCK940, L. lactis SBC001, and W. cibaria YRK005 strains were purified as previously described [11 (link),32 (link),33 (link)]. In this study, the oligosaccharides produced by L. lactis CCK940, L. lactis SBC001, and W. cibaria YRK005 strains were named CCK-, SBC-, and YRK-oligosaccharides, respectively. In brief, the culture supernatant of lactic acid bacteria was obtained by centrifuging at 9820× g for 15 min (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), and the supernatant was concentrated under reduced pressure at 60 °C. The concentrated supernatant was then loaded onto Bio-Gel P2 in a Glass Econo-Column (1.5 × 120 cm), and the oligosaccharides were separated by gel-permeation chromatography (GPC) (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The flow rate was 0.5 mL/min, and the eluents were fractionated using a fraction collector (Gilson Inc., Middleton, WI, USA) with 5 mL per tube. The fractions were analyzed by TLC, and the active fractions containing oligosaccharides were collected and lyophilized (SunilEyela, Seongnam, Republic of Korea).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Purification of GAA from Arabidopsis alg3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The medium of GAA-producing Arabidopsis alg3 culture was filtered through a Glass Econo-Column (Bio-Rad). NaCl was subsequently added to the medium until reaching a final concentration of 4 M. Then, the NaCl-containing medium was loaded into a hydrophobic interaction chromatography column (Toyopearl Phenyl-650 M, Tosoh Corporation) pre-equilibrated in 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5 with 4 M NaCl. After washing the column using 4 M NaCl in 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5 buffer, GAA was eluted by decreasing NaCl concentration. GAA-containing fractions were dialyzed to exchange the buffer into 20 mM sodium acetate pH 4.3. The dialyzed sample was applied to a cation exchange chromatography column (Toyopearl SP 550C, Tosoh Corporation) pre-equilibrated in 20 mM sodium acetate pH 4.3 buffer. After washing the column, GAA was eluted with 20 mM sodium acetate pH 4.3 containing 0.1–0.5 M NaCl. GAA-containing fractions were concentrated using a Vivaspin 20 with a 10 kDa cutoff (Sartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Glycated Nail Protein Separation and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extracted nail proteins were transferred into a 2 mL boronate affinity column [Glass Econo-Column (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Richmond, CA, USA)] to undergo a chromatographic separation into glycated nail proteins and nonglycated nail proteins. The wash buffer consisted of 0.25 mol/L ammonium acetate, containing 0.05 mol/L magnesium chloride, pH: 8.3. The elution buffer consisted of 0.1 mol/L Tris-HCl, containing 0.2 mol/L sorbitol (D-Glucitol, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 0.05 mol/L EDTA [34 (link)]. The concentration of proteins was assayed by the pyrogallol red-molybdate method on a Cobas 8000 analyzer [35 (link)]. The percentage of the glycated protein fraction was calculated from the protein content of both fractions. Following chromatography, binding and nonbinding fractions were analyzed using electrophoresis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Enzymatic Synthesis of Carbohydrates from Egg Yolk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Non-commercially available enzymes were expressed according to previous literature (Karwaski et al., 2002 (link); Moremen et al., 2018 (link); Prudden et al., 2017 (link)). The amount of enzyme that was added to the reactions is given in units (u, enzyme) per μmol (substrate) for commercial enzymes and μg (enzyme) per μmol (substrate) for in-house expressed enzymes. One unit of the commercially available enzymes is defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of 1 μmol substrate per minute using the conditions provided by the supplier. Final reactants were purified with a size exclusion Biogel (P2) from BioRad in an Econo glass column (0.7 × 30 cm / 1.5 × 30 cm / 1.5 × 50 cm) and a BioFrac fraction collector from BioRad. The carbohydrate-containing fractions were visualized using thin layer chromatography and an appropriate staining reagent (15 mL AcOH and 3.5 mL p-Anisaldehyde in a mixture of 350 mL EtOH and 50 mL H2SO4), followed by heating.
The starting material for the enzymatic synthesis was obtained from egg yolk extraction as described by Seko et al. and further optimized by others (Liu et al., 2017 (link); Seko et al., 1997 (link); Sun et al., 2014 (link); Zou et al., 2012 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Enzymatic Synthesis of Carbohydrates from Egg Yolk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Non-commercially available enzymes were expressed according to previous literature (Karwaski et al., 2002 (link); Moremen et al., 2018 (link); Prudden et al., 2017 (link)). The amount of enzyme that was added to the reactions is given in units (u, enzyme) per μmol (substrate) for commercial enzymes and μg (enzyme) per μmol (substrate) for in-house expressed enzymes. One unit of the commercially available enzymes is defined as the amount of enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of 1 μmol substrate per minute using the conditions provided by the supplier. Final reactants were purified with a size exclusion Biogel (P2) from BioRad in an Econo glass column (0.7 × 30 cm / 1.5 × 30 cm / 1.5 × 50 cm) and a BioFrac fraction collector from BioRad. The carbohydrate-containing fractions were visualized using thin layer chromatography and an appropriate staining reagent (15 mL AcOH and 3.5 mL p-Anisaldehyde in a mixture of 350 mL EtOH and 50 mL H2SO4), followed by heating.
The starting material for the enzymatic synthesis was obtained from egg yolk extraction as described by Seko et al. and further optimized by others (Liu et al., 2017 (link); Seko et al., 1997 (link); Sun et al., 2014 (link); Zou et al., 2012 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!