The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Statistica software version 5

Manufactured by StatSoft
Sourced in United States

Statistica software version 5.0 is a comprehensive data analysis and visualization tool. It provides a wide range of statistical and analytical capabilities to support research and decision-making activities.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

7 protocols using statistica software version 5

1

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pearson’s, and Yates’ chi-square tests were used to assess inter-group significance. Statistical significance was assumed at P < 0.05. Statistical analysis was completed using Statistica Software version 5.0 (STAT Soft, Cracow, Poland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Absorbed Selenium Concentrations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are expressed as the mean ± standard error of measurements from triplicate experiments. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the significance of differences among the absorbed Se concentrations, using STATISTICA software, version 5.0 (StatSoft, Inc.). P values less than 0.01 were considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experimental data are presented as the mean values ± standard deviation at three repeats. Obtained results were statistically analyzed by Statistica software version 5.0 (StatSoft Co., Tulsa, OK, USA). Significances of differences among samples were analyzed by Tukey’s test. Differences at p < 0.05 are considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Sensory Profiles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were reported as mean ± standard deviation of at least three independent repetitions. The results were statistically analysed using the Statistica software version 5.0 (StatSoft Co., Tulsa, OK, USA). Significance of differences between samples was analysed by the Tukey’s test. Differences between the means with probability p < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. The results obtained within Flash Profile analysis were analysed by using multivariate statistical technique General Procrustes Analysis (GPA), and statistical analysis was performed by using XLSTAT software (version 2019.3.2, Addinsoft).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Optimizing Sous Vide Processing Conditions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To compare means of the physical variables among experimental thermal treatments, it used a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post PinoÀHerna ´ndez et al. hoc Tukey's test (p < 0.05). The total heating time (i.e. experimental time and time given by threedimensional transient heat conduction of a partial differential equation based on Fourier's law, as previously described by Geankoplis (1998) ) and microbiological data (before and after sous vide process) were compared using a Student's t-test at a significance level of 5%. Finally, to determine the optimum conditions of time-temperature of the sous vide process, the significant effects (p < 0.05 or near values) were tested using ANOVA, and also, the response surface to the complete 2 2 factorial design (CCD) as well as the desirability function (obtained from the experimental responses of the physical parameters) were considered. All statistical analyses were undertaken using Statistica software version 5.0 (Statsoft, Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Results

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The statistical evaluation of the results was performed using one-way analysis of variance. After significant analyses of variance, multiple post hoc comparisons were performed using the Bonferroni’s test. Some data were analyzed using the unpaired t-test. The accepted level of significance for the tests was P < 0.05. All tests were performed using the Statistica software version 5.1 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK). All final data were presented as percentage of control (vehicle-treated samples). All data are expressed as means ± SEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comparative Statistical Analysis of Experimental Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All results are expressed as mean ± SD. After verification of the homogeneity of the variances and the normality of the data, the results relative to all studied responses were submitted to one way ANOVA analysis according to the procedure GLM of the Statistica software version 5.1 (Statsoft, Tulsa, USA). When ANOVA proved to be significant, the Duncan test was used to compare averages; the significance level of 5% is retained.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!