The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

22 protocols using igf 1

1

Molecular Changes in Ischemic Stroke in T2DM Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue from the ischemic area of the ipsilateral hemisphere from both vehicle-control and L-4F-treated T2DM stroke mice were isolated at 21 days after dMCAo. Brain-tissue lysate was subjected to WB analysis, as described previously (46 (link), 64 (link)). The following primary antibodies were used: AQP4 (1:5,000, Milipore, cat# ab3594), myelin basic protein (MBP, 1:500, Millipore, cat# MAB386), CD68 (ED-1, a marker of M1-macrophages, 1:1,000, Serotec, cat# MCA341R), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1, 1:1,000, Abcam, cat# ab7202), toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4, 1:500, Santa Cruz, cat# sc-10741), Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1, 1:500, Santa Cruz, cat# sc-9013), IGF-1 receptor β (TGF-1Rβ,1:500, Santa Cruz, cat# sc-713), and β-actin (1:10,000, Abcam, cat# ab6276).
Total RNA was isolated using a standard protocol and quantitative RT-PCR was performed on an ABI Prism 7,000 Sequence Detection System using the Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). For each sample, the cDNA was generated and used to amplify GAPDH, AQP4, MBP, ED1, MCP-1, TLR4, IGF1, and IGF-1R as described previously (46 (link)). All the primers for the RT-PCR assay were designed using Primer Express software (ABI). Each sample was detected in triplicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Immunohistochemical Analysis of IGF Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical analysis of tissue microarray comprising lung biopsy specimens was performed as described previously5 (link)69 (link). In brief, IHC staining was performed as described above using primary antibodies against IGF1 (Santa Cruz; Cat. No. sc-9013), IGF2 (Millipore; Cat. No. 05-166), IGF-1R (Cell Signaling; Cat. No. 3027), pIGF-1R (Cell Signaling; Cat. No. 3024). The expression level of IGF1, IGF2, IGF-1R, and pIGF-1R was blindly analysed and quantified using a four-value intensity score (0, 1+, 2+ and 3+) and a percentage (0–100%) of the extent of reactivity. A final expression score was obtained by multiplying the intensity value by the extent of reactivity (range, 0–300).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Protein Expression Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary antibodies used were EGFR-t (C2C3, GeneTex), EGFR-p (S.684.2, Thermo), Src (36D10, Cell Signaling), Src-p (GTX24816, Genetex), STAT5 (9310, Cell Signaling), STAT5-p (9359, Cell Signaling), Sp1 (GTX110593, Genetex), Sp1-p (phosphor Thr739, Genetex), IGF1 (sc-9013, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and β-actin (mouse monoclonal, CINVESTAV). Secondary antibodies used were goat anti-rabbit HRP (catalog number 62-6120, Invitrogen) or goat anti-mouse HRP (catalog number A9044, Sigma), WesternSure Chemiluminescent Western blotting reagent, and the Li-COR C-DiGit Blot Scanner (LI-COR Biosciences, Finland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Expression Analysis in Callus Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were extracted from six callus tissues of each group and quantitated using a kit (Bio-Rad, Mississauga, ON, Canada). Protein samples (30 μg) were fractionated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Immunoblotting was carried out as described in a previous study [32 (link)] using antibodies against insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and Runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx-2) (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) with β-tubulin (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) used as loading control. Runx-2 and IGF-1 protein levels relative to β-actin protein amounts were assessed by densitometric analysis and expressed relative to the levels obtained for V-WT mice [33 (link)]. Bands were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham, Aylesbury, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of Signaling Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lysates were resolved by electrophoresis, transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore Corporation), and probed with antibodies against GAPDH (Santa Cruz), VEGF (Santa Cruz), SMAD2 (CST), IGF1 (Santa Cruz), SMAD4 (CST), JAK2 (CST), HGF (Abcam), Phospho-STAT3 (CST), Phospho-c-Jun (CST).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of IGF Pathway

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed as previously described [14 (link),15 (link)]. Briefly, after deparaffinization and rehydration, tissue sections (5 μm thick) were subjected to antigen retrieval, followed by peroxidase block and treatment with a blocking reagent for nonspecific binding. The slides were then incubated overnight with primary antibody at 4°C in a humidified chamber. The following primary antibodies were used: IGF-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, dilution 1:100), IGF-2 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, 1:500), IGF-1R (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, 1:50), and IGF-2R (Cell Signaling, 1:50); followed by peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. Normal kidney served as positive controls for IGF-1, IGF-1R, and IGF-2. Negative controls included omission of primary antibody.
All immunohistochemistry evaluation was performed in a blinded manner by an attending pathologist. The slides were scored semiquantitatively. A score of 0 indicated no staining, 1 indicated focal weak staining, 2 indicated moderately positive staining, and 3 indicated intensely positive staining. Tumors with strong staining (scores 2 to 3) were grouped, and tumors with weak or no staining (scores 0 to 1) were grouped. All analyses were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Antibodies and Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The western blotting assay was performed as described previously [8 (link)]. The antibodies we used were as follow: HBP1 (11746-1-AP, Proteintech), IGF-1 (sc-518040, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), IGFBP1 (sc-55474, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), AKT (#9272, Cell Signaling), p-AKT (#4060, Cell Signaling), GSK-3α/β (#5676, Cell Signaling), p-GSK-3α/β (#9331, Cell Signaling), FLAG (F1804, Sigma-Aldrich), HA (MMS101P, Covance), β-actin (AC026, Abclonal), anti-mouse IgG antibody DyLight 800 (610-145-121, Rockland) and anti-rabbit IgG antibody DyLight 800 (611-145-002, Rockland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Signaling Pathway Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were solubilized in cold NP-40 cell lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4, 1% NP-40, and a protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail from Pierce). Lysates were analyzed by Western blotting with specific primary (NEDD4, (Cell Signaling, Danvers MA), Akt (#4691, Cell Signaling), Akt phospho-S473 (#4060, Cell Signaling), phospho-p44/42 MAPK (Erk1/2 Thr202/Tyr204, #4370, Cell Signaling), and β-actin (#A1978, Sigma Aldrich) and HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies. Where indicated, cells were serum-starved in DMEM with 1% FBS for 2 hrs prior to treatment with IGF-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 10 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Analysis of IGF-1 in Porcine Heart

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pig heart paraffin-embedded sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, washed with PBS, and antigens were retrieved with sodium citrate. For tyramide amplification, slides were incubated with 0.3 % H2O2. Tissue sections were then blocked and incubated overnight at 4 °C in blocking solution with primary antibody IGF-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Slides were washed and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (see Additional file 2: Table S2). Incubation with secondary antibody alone did not give any detectable background signal. Vectastain ABC kit Elite PK-6101 (Vectorlabs) was used to develop DAB colorimetric assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole cell extracts were prepared by the lysis of cells in buffer (60 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 5% glycerol, 2% SDS) on ice. Proteins were quantified using Pierce BCA (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cellular proteins (50 µg) were solubilized in sample buffer (4% SDS, 0.25 m sucrose, 30 mm , 0.075% bromophenol blue and 0.01 m EDTA-Na2) and denatured at for 5 min. The proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE using 4% stacking and 12% separating gels and then electro-transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The membrane was blocked in 0.05 M Tris-buffered saline with 0.5% triton X-100 (TBS-T, pH 7.4) containing 5% skim milk at room temperature for 2 h and then incubated in 3% skim milk or bovine serum albumin at overnight with primary antibody. The primary antibodies used were IGF-1 (1:1000 dilution; Santa Cruz, CA, USA) p-AKT (1:500 dilution; CST, USA) p-ERK1/2 (1:1000 dilution; Santa Cruz, CA, USA) GAPDH (1:1000 dilution; Santa Cruz, CA, USA). After washing with TBS-T, the membrane was incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:2000 for anti-rabbit-IgG or anti-mouse-IgG) for 1 h at room temperature. Proteins were detected by the Amersham enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting detection kit (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!