The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mueller hinton agar (mha)

Manufactured by Neogen
Sourced in United States

The MHA is a laboratory equipment used for the detection and enumeration of microorganisms. It provides a standardized method for the assessment of antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using mueller hinton agar (mha)

1

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Mueller–Hinton agar (MHA) (NEOGEN) plates were inoculated by streaking using the cotton swab three times over the entire surface and rotating the MHA plates approximately 60° each time to ensure an even distribution of the inoculums. Then, the MHA plates were left open for three to five minutes to allow for any excess surface moisture to be absorbed [16 ]. The impregnated discs were dispensed onto the surface of the inoculated agar plates using sterile forceps. Discs of commercial ciprofloxacin (1 µg/disc) and fluconazole (1 µg/disc) were used as positive controls for bacterial and fungal pathogens, respectively, and the pure solvent (petroleum) impregnated discs were used as negative controls. Then, the MHA plates were sealed with parafilm and incubated at 37°C for 24 hrs and 27°C for 72 hrs for bacterial and fungal pathogens, respectively. Then, the diameters of the zone of inhibition around each disc were measured to the nearest millimeter along two axes (i.e., 90° to each other) and the means of the two readings were recorded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Disc Diffusion and Automated Systems

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Various antibiotic discs (Bioanalyses, Turkey) were used for antimicrobial susceptibility tests (Supplementary Tables S4, S5). The tests were performed manually (CLSI, 2017 ) from 1 January 2018, to 19 May 2019. Mueller–Hinton agar (MHA) (Neogen, UK) was used for the disc diffusion test. The diameters of the inhibition zones around each disc were measured and compared with the standard inhibition zone, as recommended by the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institution (CLSI, 2017 ). The results were interpreted as sensitive or resistant; intermediate resistance was also considered as resistance. On the other hand, from 20 May 2019, onward, the antimicrobial susceptibility test was carried out using an automated system with a Vitek®2 AST-P640 card for Gram-positive bacteria (G+) and AST-N327 cards for Gram-negative bacteria (G−) (BioMerieux, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic Sensitivity and MIC Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic sensitivity to cefiderocol (MedChemExpress, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA) and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for piperacillin/tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, cefepime, meropenem, and imipenem (Liofilchem, Waltham, MA, USA) were obtained by recording the lowest concentration of antibiotic that inhibited growth of bacteria on Mueller Hinton agar (Neogen, Lansing, MI, USA), as described by the manufacturer’s protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibacterial Susceptibility Screening of Campylobacter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phenotyping antibacterial susceptibility screening to ciprofloxacin (5 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), and tetracycline (30 μg) was conducted as recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) Advisory Group on Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance guidelines on foodborne bacteria. The test was performed using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method and the results were interpreted using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [24 ]. Antibacterial susceptibility test was performed on Mueller-Hinton agar (Neogen Corporation, Lansing, MI, United States) that was supplemented with 10% sheep blood, according to CLSI guidelines. The plates were then sealed in an anaerobic jar 2.5L (Oxoid, UK) each containing gas generating sachet without catalyst in a microaerophilic incubator at 41°C for 24 h. The suspect colonies were subjected to Gram staining and examination under a light microscope for the identification of any potential Campylobacter spp. Antibiotic susceptibility was calculated by the zones of inhibition observed around each antibiotic disc in millimeters. Standard reference strains of Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC® 29213, Thermo Fischer, USA) and C. jejuni ATCC (33560) were used as quality controls [22 ,25 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!