The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

2d cpa mr

Manufactured by Tomtec
Sourced in Germany

The 2D CPA MR is a lab equipment product manufactured by Tomtec. It is designed for the analysis of cardiac performance data. The core function of the 2D CPA MR is to provide cardiac performance assessment capabilities.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using 2d cpa mr

1

Cardiac Imaging: Vector-Based Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LV volumes, LVEF, and GLS measurements on CMR images were performed using the CMR feature tracking software (2D CPA MR; TomTec Imaging Systems, Unterschleissheim, Germany), which is a vector-based analysis tool based on a hierarchical algorithm. For each of the three apical long-axis SSFP images, the LV endocardial border at the end-systolic frame was semi-automatically determined by a 3-point click (both sides of the mitral annulus and the apex). The software then automatically propagated the contour and followed its features throughout the cardiac cycle to generate LV volume curves from which LVEDV, LVESV, and LVEF were determined. The software also provided segmental peak LS values on the bull’s eye map as well as the GLS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cardiac MRI Imaging and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CMR imaging was performed using a 3-T scanner (Discovery 750 W; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) with a phased-array cardiovascular coil. Retrospective electrocardiography-gated localizing spin-echo sequences were used to identify the long axis of the heart. Steady-state free precision (SSFP) dynamic gradient-echo cine loops were acquired by retrospective electrocardiographic gating and parallel imaging techniques during 10- to 15-s breath-holds with the following general parameters: 8-mm slice thickness of the imaging planes, 40 × 40-cm field of view, 200 × 160-scan matrix, 50° flip angle, 3.8/1.7-ms repetition/echo times, and 20 reconstructed cardiac phases. Eight to 16 short-axis slices from the base of the heart to the apex, and three standard long-axis views were recorded in each patient.
CMR LV volumes and LVEF were measured by the same operator (the expert that visited each hospital for training intervention) via feature tracking analysis (2D CPA MR; TomTec Imaging Systems, Unterschleissheim, Germany). In three apical long-axis SSFP images, the LV endocardial border was manually traced at the end-diastolic frame. Then, the feature tracking software propagates the endocardial contour and follows its tissue features throughout a cardiac cycle to generate LV volume curves from which LVEDV, LVESV, and LVEF were determined automatically.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cardiac MRI Analysis via Automated Software

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CMR images were analyzed using commercial FT software (2D CPA MR; TomTec Imaging Systems, Unterschleissheim, Germany), which is a vector-based analysis tool based on a hierarchical algorithm [13 –15 ]. Using three apical long-axis cine SSFP images, the LV endocardial border at end-systole was semi-automatically drawn after 3-point clicking. Manual adjustment of endocardial border was performed when required. Subsequently, the software automatically propagates the contour and follows its features throughout the cardiac cycle to generate LV volume curve, from which the software provided LVEDV, LVESV and LVEF.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Validating LA Foreshortening and Strain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To validate the relationship between the LA foreshortened view and LA strain analysis, we prospectively acquired apical four-chamber and two-chamber, steady-state free precession (SSFP), dynamic gradient-echo cine loops optimized for the left ventricle, and those optimized for the left atrium in 15 patients who had clinically indicated cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examinations. CMR imaging was performed with a 3.0T scanner (SIGNA Premier, GE Healthcare Milwaukee, WI) with a phased-array cardiovascular coil. On apical long-axis SSFP images, the optimal cutting plane was individually determined to visualize LV (or LA) long-axis as long as possible (Fig 3). These planes were rotated to the same degree to obtain apical four-chamber and two-chamber views. LA strain was measured using feature tracking software (2DCPA MR, TomTec Imaging Systems GmbH, Unterschleissheim, Germany). The software also provided maximal and minimal LA volumes. Values for apical four-chamber and two-chamber views were averaged and compared between LV-focused views and LA-focused views. We also compared the LAVs and LALS between the CMR biplane method and the 2DE biplane method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ventricular Strain Analysis by MRI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Global circumferential strain (GCS) and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were calculated using feature tracking analysis on the steady-state free precession ventricular short-axis and 4-chamber images at the midcavity level using commercially available software (2D CPA MR, version 1.1.2.36, TomTec imaging systems, Unterschleissheim, Germany). Details of the strain analysis methodology and reproducibility in our laboratory have been previously published. 23 (link) The endocardial border of the single (or dominant) ventricle was manually traced, and the software automatically tracked the border throughout the cardiac cycle. If tracking was judged to be suboptimal by visual inspection, the endocardial border was retraced until satisfactory tracking was accomplished. As GCS and GLS represent fiber shortening, they have a negative numeric value. Throughout the article, a numerically lower (more negative) value represents greater shortening and is referred to as better GCS/ GLS, whereas a numerically higher value (less negative) is referred to as worse GCS/GLS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!