The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using anti mouse cd45.2 clone 104

1

Tumor-Draining Lymph Node Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor draining lymph nodes were harvested 7 days after the treatment and processed into single cell suspensions via mechanical crushing. After filtration (70 µm), cells (1 × 106 cells) were aliquoted for staining. Cells were incubated with anti-mouse CD16/32 (clone 93; Biolegend; cat # 101301) to reduce non-specific staining. Cells were sequentially stained with iTag H-2Db HPV 16 E7 (RAHYNIVTF; cat # TB-5008-1), H-2Kb p15E (KSPWFTTL; cat # TB-M507-1) or H-2Kb Ova (SIINFEKL; cat # TB-5001-1) tetramers (MBL International, Woburn, MA, USA) for 30 min, followed by staining with anti-mouse CD45.2 (clone 104; cat # 109815) from Biolegend and anti-CD8 (clone KT15; cat # D271-A64) from MBL. Dead cells were excluded on analysis following sytox blue (Thermo Fisher Scientific; cat # S34857) staining. Isotype control antibodies and fluorescence-minus-one approaches were used to ensure staining specificity. All analyses were performed on a BD Fortessa analyzer running FACSDiva software and interpreted using FlowJo (vX10.0.7r2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MOC cells were harvested and non-specific binding was blocked with anti-CD16/32 antibodies (Biolegend) prior to staining. Tissues were prepared into single-cell suspensions as previously described (14 (link)), followed by anti-CD16/32 antibody staining. Cell surface staining was performed using flourophore conjugated anti-mouse CD45.2 clone 104, CD3 clone 145-2C11, CD4 clone GK1.5, CD8 clone 53-6.7, NK1.1 clone PK136, CD31 clone 390, PD-L1 clone 10F.9G2, H2-Kb clone AF6-88.5, CD107a clone 1D4B, CD69 clone H1.2F3, PD-1 clone RMP1-30, CD11b clone M1/70, CD11c clone N418, CD80 clone 16-10A1, and CD86 clone GL-1 antibodies from Biolegend, 41BB clone 17B5 and OX40 clone OX-86 from eBioscience, and CD8 clone KT15 from MBL (Woburn, MA). H2Kb:KSPWFTTL (p15E604–611) tetramer was purchased from MBL. Dead cells were excluded via 7AAD negativity. Isotype control antibodies and a “fluorescence minus one” method of antibody combination were used for specific staining validation. Data was acquired on a FACSCanto using FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences) and analyzed on FlowJo software vX10.0.7r2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Single-Cell Tumor Immune Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor tissues were processed into single-cell suspensions by mincing, as well as chemical (Murine Tumor Dissociation Kit, Miltenyi Biotec) and mechanical (gentleMACS Dissociator) dissociation, per manufacturer recommendations. Suspensions were filtered through a 100 μm filter and washed with 1% BSA in PBS prior to blocking nonspecific staining with anti-CD16/32 (BioLegend) antibody. Cell surface staining was performed using fluorophore-conjugated anti–mouse CD45.2 (clone 104), CD3 (clone 145-2C11), CD4 (clone GK1.5), CD8 (clone 53-6.7), CD31 (clone 390), PDGFR (clone APA5), PD-L1 (clone 10F.9G2), H2-Kb (clone AF6-88.5), CD107a (clone 1D4B), PD-1 (clone RMP1-30), CD11b (clone M1/70), Ly6G (clone 1A8), Ly6C (clone HK1.4), CTLA-4 (clone 9H10), CD39 (clone Duha59), CD11c (clone N418), F4/80 (clone BM8), and CD206 (clone C068C2) from BioLegend, and IL-12Rb2 (clone 305719) from R&D Systems. FoxP3+ Treg staining performed with the mouse Treg Staining Kit #1 (eBioscience) as per manufacturer’s protocol. Cell viability was assessed via staining with Sytox (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or Zombie (BioLegend) dyes. All analyses were performed on a BD Fortessa analyzer running FACSDiva software and interpreted using FlowJo V.X10.0.7r2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!