The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Infrared beam

Manufactured by Med Associates
Sourced in United States

The Infrared Beams are a type of laboratory equipment used to detect and measure the presence and movement of objects. They emit infrared light beams that can be interrupted by an object passing through, triggering a sensor to record the event.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using infrared beam

1

Operant Chamber Setup for Behavioral Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Training and testing were conducted in trapezoid shaped stainless steel (62 × 32 × 39 cm) chambers (Fig. 4G), as described in Samson et al. (2015) (link). These chambers were equipped with two retractable levers (Med-Associates), a cue light above each lever, an infrared beam (Med-Associates) to record head entry into the food area, a food reward port controlled by a solenoid valve (Parker Hannifin), a sound attenuating shell around the operant chamber and speakers delivering white noise. Control of the experimental procedures was conducted by a computer interfaced with the behavioral testing chambers using Basic-X software (NetMedia). Task and behavioral events were timestamped by parallel outputs from the Basic-X into the Cheetah acquisition system (Neuralynx).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Operant Conditioning Chamber Setup for Behavioral Studies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Testing was conducted in trapezoid shaped stainless steel (62 × 32 × 39cm) chambers (Figure 1). Each test chamber was held within a sound-attenuating shell, along with speakers delivering white noise. A food cup area (7.5 × 7.5cm) was equipped with an infrared beam (Med Associates, St. Albans, VT) to record head entry (i.e., nose poke). Two retractable levers (Med Associates) were located on either side of the food cup area. A cue light was located above each lever. Liquid food rewards were delivered to the food cup area by a metal cannulae and a Tygon tube linked a liquid reservoir to the cannulae. The amount of food reward delivered was controlled by solenoids (Parker Hannifin Corporation, Fairfield, NJ). The solenoid was located outside the sound attenuating chambers and was covered by its own sound attenuating shell, to minimize, if not completely abolish these sounds from reaching the rat. For this study, reward consisted of vanilla Ensure (Abbott, Abbott Park, IL). Control of the experimental procedures and data collection was carried out by a computer interfaced with the behavioral testing chambers using Basic X software (NetMedia Inc., Tucson, AZ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Behavioral Assessment of Anxiety in Rodents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three hours after LPS injections, subjects were placed in an open field chamber (43 cm × 43 cm × 30 cm) for 10 min and behavior was automatically tracked via breakage of infrared beam (Med Associates, Fairfax, VT, USA). Distance traveled and time spent in the (anxiogenic) center area were analyzed as measures of locomotion and anxiety-like behavior, respectively (Gould et al., 2009 (link); Walsh and Cummins, 1976 (link)). Immediately after OFT, subjects were tested on an elevated zero maze (EZM). This apparatus consists of a 5.5 cm wide circular platform (internal diameter 35 cm) raised 50 cm off the ground, with two equally spaced enclosed compartments covering half of the platform. Video was manually scored (Noldus Observer) by an observer blind to subject genotype for time spent in both open and closed arms as a measure of anxiety-like behavior, and for zone crosses (subject crossing from open to closed arm and vice versa) as a measure of activity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Open Field Locomotor Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Locomotor activity was assessed in four open field arenas (60 × 60 cm) equipped with infrared beams (Med Associates, St. Albans, VT, USA) to calculate total distance travelled. Mice were acclimatised to the testing room at least one hour prior to testing and were tested in the dark for a total of 30 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cocaine-Induced Conditioned Place Preference

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CPP was assessed using a two-chamber box equipped with infrared beams (Med Associates) as previously described with modifications [38 (link), 45 (link)]. The two compartments exhibited different patterns on the walls and floor, and were separated by a removable guillotine door. On the first day, mice were allowed to freely explore both chambers for 20 min. For the conditioning phase, mice received a saline injection and were confined to one chamber or a drug injection (cocaine, CTEP or cocaine+CTEP) and were confined to the opposite chamber for 20 min. Mice were submitted to 3 saline-paired injections and 3 drug-paired injections in alternate days, resulting in 6 days of conditioning. Conditioning was counterbalanced so that half of the mice received cocaine injections paired to side A and for the other half cocaine was paired to side B. The CPP test was performed 24 h after the last conditioning session and consisted of a drug free session where mice were allowed to freely explore both compartments for 20 min as in the habituation session. Time spent in each compartment was assessed and the data were expressed as the difference between the time spent on the drug-paired side and the saline-paired side. Ten to thirteen mice per group were tested.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Open Field Locomotor Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The open field test was conducted using a square arena (27.3 × 27.3 × 20.3 cm) equipped with infrared beams (Med Associates, Inc., Fairfax, VT). In each experiment, the mouse was placed in the center of the arena, and the movement was recorded over 20 min. Cumulative movement duration and average velocity were recorded, along with the entrance to the central zone, with analyses performed using EthoVision XT software (version 13; Noldus Information Technology, Wageningen, The Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Exploratory Behavior in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
8-week-old mice were placed in one of four 43 × 43 cm2 square plexiglass cages equipped with infrared beams to detect horizontal movements and vertical rearing (MED Associates, St. Albans, VT) and were monitored for 60 min. All horizontal and vertical beam breaks were recorded. Data expressed as number of beam breaks per 5-min epoch.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Assessing Dopaminergic Activity in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For assessment of baseline activity (ref. 16 (link)), animals were placed in a square apparatus (27.31 cm Length × 27.31 cm width × 20.32 cm height) consisting of 48 infrared beams (Med Associates) for 30 min. For behavioral assessment with stimulation of DA release, mice were injected intraperitoneally (IP) with 5 mg/kg of d-amphetamine and allowed to freely explore the open field box for a total of 60 min. This approach was used to reveal subtle differences in DAergic neurons, as used previously in PINK1 and Parkin knockout models53 (link)–55 (link). Data were collected with Open Field Activity Software (Med Associates) in 1 min intervals over the test period. For experiments to rescue baseline hypoactivity in the 14 month post-AAV:ThCre;Esrrgflfl-injected mice, l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA; Millipore Sigma D1507) was injected IP at a 6 mg/kg concentration with Benserazide (12 mg/kg; Millipore Sigma B7283), and mice were allowed to explore the open field box for 60 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Rodent Locomotor Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Locomotor activity was assessed in four open field arenas (60 x 60 cm) equipped with infra-red beams (Med Associates, St. Albans, VT, USA) to calculate total distance travelled. Mice were tested in the dark for a total of 60 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cuprizone and CNM-Au8 Effects on Mouse Behavior

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Open field (N = 12 mice/group) and fine motor kinematic (N = 10 mice/group) analyses of cuprizone/CNM-Au8 treated animals were performed by Charles River Laboratories (Kuopio, Finland).
For the open field test, mice were placed in the centre of an activity chamber equipped with infrared beams (Med Associates, Inc.). Behaviours were recorded for 30 min in 5-min bins.
Fine motor skills and gait parameters were assessed using an automated, high precision kinematic analysis system (MotoRater, TSE Systems). Before each test session, mice were externally marked on joints of limbs and tail. Movements were captured using high speed (300 fps) cameras positioned above, below, and at the side of the animal and analysed using SimiMotion and custom software (Charles River Labs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!