The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

538 protocols using spss statistics for windows version 19

1

Comparing EM Clerkship Requirements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics were used to report general characteristics and demographics of the EM CD. Comparisons between medical schools which required students to take an EM clerkship and those which offered EM as an elective rotation were made when possible. All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19. (IBM Corp. Released 2010. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Laparoscopic Scoring for Cytoreduction in Gynecologic Carcinomatosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The objective of this retrospective descriptive non-randomised study is to compare the two laparoscopic scores to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy to predict suboptimal cytoreduction in patients with gynaecological peritoneal carcinomatosis.
The demographic characteristics of each patient, the tumour, and the surgical results obtained were analysed.
Parameters such as FIGO stage, PCI, and Fagotti score were determined for each patient who underwent laparoscopy and laparotomy.
The main objective was to determine if the models correlated with the incomplete debulking rate (optimal or suboptimal) and overall survival, using ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves and the Kaplan–Meier method for survival.
Significance was assumed with a p-value less than 0.05.
The statistical program used was IBM SPSS Statistics version 19 (IBM Corp, released in 2010. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0. Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparative Analysis of Tau-KO Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differences between wild-type and tau-KO animals in q-PCR, Western blot, and behavioral data were analyzed with the Student’s t-test using the SPSS software (IBM Corp., released 2013, IBM-SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0, Armonk, NY, USA). Graphic design was performed with GraphPad Prism version 5.01 (La Jolla, CA, USA). Outliers were detected using the GraphPad software QuickCalcs (version 9.0) (p  <  0.05) (La Jolla, CA, USA). The data were expressed as mean ± SEM, and significance difference levels between tau-KO and WT mice were set at * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Validation of RNA-seq data by qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of eight genes with different expression patterns in our Illumina RNA-seq data were randomly chosen to further verify by qRT-PCR. First strand cDNA synthesis and qRT-PCR were performed using PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (Perfect Real Time) (Takara, Dalian, China) and SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II (Tli RNaseH Plus, Shiga, Japan) (TaKaRa), respectively. The reaction was performed on the BIO-RAD CFX96 sequence detection system. The specific primers (Supplementary Table S1) of eight genes were designed with online Integrated DNA Technologies (https://sg.idtdna.com/scitools/applications/realtimepcr/). And ZmActin was used as an internal reference gene. Each PCR reaction (20 µL) contained 10 µL of SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II, 10 µM of forward and reverse primers, and 2 µL of template cDNA which diluted 10 folds with deionized water. Three independent biological replications were performed for each sample. Relative expression levels were calculated using the 2−∆∆CT method29 (link). And the regression coefficient between qRT-PCR results and RNA-seq data was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows Version 19.0 (IBM Corp.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Prognostic Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For statistical analysis, “IBM SPSS statistics for Windows Version 19.0” (Armonk, NY, IBM Corp.) computer package program used. Continuous variables are expressed as mean±standard deviation, categorical data as frequency, and percentage (n%). Whether continuous variables are normally distributed was tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. In comparison of binary groups, independent sample t-test was used for normally distributed variables and Mann–Whitney U test was used for variables that did not present normal distribution. Pearson correlation tests were used for parametric variables to determine the linear relationship between the variables. Whether various variables are independent risk factors affecting the height of NLR and PLR that were investigated using the logistic regression model. In multivariate analyzes, the independent effects of possible risk factors on predicting survival were analyzed by backward selection method using Cox regression analysis. Values for possible risk factors were determined using the Receiver Operating Characteristic to perform survival analysis. The effect of the levels of risk factors on survival was investigated with Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) test. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Statistical significance limit was accepted as p<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Neurological Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

All independent continuous variables are expressed as median with range and all independent categorical variables and outcome variables are expressed in frequencies and percentages. The association between the independent continuous variables and the outcome variables (neurological outcome and mortality) were assessed using the Mann–Whitney
Utest. The association between the independent categorical variables and the outcome variables were assessed using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. All statistical analyses were carried out at a 5% level of significance. The data were analyzed using the SPSS software version 19.0 (IBM Corp. Released 2010. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

MRI Correlates of Oswestry Disability Index

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data was checked for completeness and cleaned before analysis. No missing data was identified in the dataset. Descriptive statistics is presented in the form of frequencies and percentages for categorical variables and summary statistics for continuous variables. The dependent variable (ODI) was tested for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk Test and showed a skewed distribution. Spearman's non-parametric correlation was applied to determine the relationship between MRI parameters and ODI score. Chi square test was applied when comparing ODI category and categorical independent variables. Statistical significance was assumed if calculated p value was below 0.05. Data entry and analysis was carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) and Stata, version 16 (Stata Corp) respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Voxel-wise Analysis of White Matter Integrity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Voxel-wise statistics across participants were put into effect for each voxel of FA images. We used 5000 permutations and Threshold-Free Cluster Enhancement (TFCE) to correct multiple comparisons. Considering results of the voxel-wise analyses, we reported the significant clusters ≥15 voxels, labeled them according to the Johns Hopkins University JHU-ICBM-tracts atlas. Then we binarized the TFCE corrected statistical maps into masks (uncorrected p < 0.05). Finally, Pearson correlation analysis was performed between the significant cognitive scores and clusters of white matter fibers for patients and healthy controls, (p < 0.05) [24 (link)] in SPSS 19.0 (IBM Corp. Released 2010. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Similarly, we repeated the same analyses for the AD, MD, and RD values, but we binarized the TFCE corrected statistical maps into masks with corrected p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparative Statistical Analysis of Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous data are reported as mean ± standard deviation (range) and were compared using Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Differences between the two groups for continuous variables were analyzed with Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, while differences in dummy variables were analyzed with Fisher exact test. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using IBMSPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Metabolomic Analysis of Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MZmine 2.0 and SIMCA (version 14.1; Umetrics, Malmö, Sweden) were used for peak detection and establishing the principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS‐DA) model.22, 23 Preliminary selection of differential metabolites was accomplished using the corresponding variable importance (VIP) value, coefficient plot and s‐plot. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for data analysis. Two‐tailed Wilcoxon rank‐sum tests were used to compare metabolite expression levels for 2‐sample tests: NC vs LC, LC vs MT. Steel‐Dwass tests were used for multiple comparisons between all groups: NC vs LC vs MT. Two‐tailed t test was used to compare pairwise differences in expression in cells, and ANOVA was used for comparisons involving multiple cells. The threshold for significance was < .05 for all tests. Association between metabolite expression level and cell invasiveness was assessed by Pearson correlation coefficients. Hierarchical clustering was carried out on the log transformed normalized data using the MeV software package (version 4.9.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!