The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

509 protocols using jem 2010

1

Comprehensive Characterization of HA Powders

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HA powders were characterized by X-ray diffraction (Rigaku Smart Lab, Tokyo, Japan), infrared spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy (JEOL JEM-2010; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), and electron diffraction (JEOL JEM-2010; JEOL) following standard methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Advanced Microscopy Techniques for Material Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TEM images, HRTEM images, and EDX analysis were acquired using JEOL JEM-2010 and JEM-2100F TEM operating at 200 kV. SAED patterns were acquired using a JEOL JEM-2010 TEM operating at 200 kV. HAADF-STEM images were acquired on a JEOL ARM200F (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) aberration-corrected TEM operated at 200 kV with a cold field emission gun and double hexapole Cs correctors (CEOS GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). The convergent semiangle of the probe was set at ~30 mrad. HAADF-STEM images were collected using a half-angle range from about 68 to 280 mrad. AFM images were recorded on a Dimension 5000 AFM (Veeco, CA, USA) under ambient conditions. Scanning electron microscopy images were obtained on a field emission scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss Supra 55) operated at 5 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Structural Characterization of Crystalline Product

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystalline structure of the product was analyzed using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Rigaku D/max-2500, Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) using Cu Kα radiation. The morphology, nanostructure, and composition of the sample were characterized using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, JEOL JSM-6700F, JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Tokyo, Japan), transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL JEM-2010, JEOL Ltd., Japan), and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM, JEOL JEM-2010, JEOL Ltd., Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area data were collected by obtaining nitrogen adsorption isotherms at 77 K using a Micromeritics ASAP 2020 analyser (ASAP 2020, Micromeritics Company, USA). Wide-angle XRD patterns (10°–90° over 2 h) were collected using a Bruker D8 Advanced X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (k = 1.5406 Å) at 40 kV and 40 mA (Bruker D8, Brucker Company, Germany). TEM images were acquired with a JEM 2010 electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV to examine sample morphologies (JEM-2010, JEOL Company, Japan), and field emission scanning electron microscope (S-4800, Hitachi Company, Japan). XPS data were generated using an Axis Ultra spectrometer with monochromatized Al Kα X-ray radiation as the excitation source (225 W) (EscaLab 250Xi, Thermo Fisher Scientific Company, USA). Raman microspectroscopy was performed with a Renishaw InVia unit having an Ar ion laser (inVia reflex, Renishaw Company, UK). TGA data were acquired using a TA instrument, operating under air at a flow rate of 100 mL min−1. The temperature of each sample was increased from 30 to 800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 (SDT Q600, TA Company, USA). TPD trials were carried out with a Micromeritics ASAP 2720 instrument with a temperature ramp of 40–650 °C, a ramp rate of 10 °C min−1 and a flow of 45 mL min−1 (ASAP 2720, Micromeritics Company, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

SWCNT Characterization by Spectroscopy and Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SWCNTs synthesized by the chemical vapor deposition method (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc.) were used in this study. Their physical and chemical properties were characterized by several techniques, including Raman spectroscopy, SEM, and TEM. Raman spectra were collected using a Raman microscope (Renishaw inVia Plus, Renishaw Inc., Hoffman Estates, IL, USA) with a 50× air objective lens and a 633 nm (1.96 eV) laser. Diameters and shapes of SWCNTs were characterized using SEM and TEM (JEOL-6700F and JEOL JEM-2010, respectively, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FTIR spectra were
examined using a Bruker Tensor 27 (Germany) spectrometer in the 4000–500
cm–1 region taking 32 scans at a resolution of 4
cm–1. The samples were mixed with spectroscopic
grade KBr using a mortar and compressed into pellets. XRD of materials
was recorded using a Shimadzu 6100 X-ray diffractometer (Japan) using
Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) at a voltage of 40
kV, a current of 30 mA, a scanning speed of 3.0°/min, and a step
size of 0.02° in the 2-theta range of 10–80°. Raman
spectroscopy was performed using a LabRAM spectrometer (HORIBA Jobin
Yvon, Edison, NJ) with 785 nm diode laser. The morphologies of samples
were observed with SEM connected with an EDX spectrometer (Hitachi
JEOL-JSM-6700F system, Japan). TEM images were obtained with a JEOL
JEM-2010 (JEOL, Japan) transmission electron microscope operated at
200 kV. Powder samples were dispersed in ethanol and ultra-sonicated
for 5 min. One drop of this solution was placed on a copper grid with
holey carbon film. The chemical states of samples were investigated
using XPS (Thermo VG Multilab 2000) with monochromic Al Kα (1486.6
eV) as the X-ray source. The binding energies were calibrated with
respect to the carbon 1s peak at 284.6 eV. UV–vis spectra of
solutions were characterized over the wavelength range of 200–800
nm using a UV–vis spectrophotometer (METASH, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Characterization of Novel Material

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XRD was carried out using a X’Pert powder X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm). Raman spectra were obtained using laser confocal micro-Raman spectroscopy (LabRAM HR800, Horiba Jobin Yvon). FTIR spectra were collected using a Tensor27 (Bruker) spectrometer. XPS measurements were performed in an ESCALAB 250 spectrometer under vacuum (about 2 × 10−9 mbar). Field-emission SEM images were conducted on a Quanta 400 FEG microscope (FEI Company). TEM images corresponding element energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) were carried out on a JEOL JEM-2010 (JEOL Ltd.). All electrochemical measurements were tested in a three-electrode cell using a CHI 760e electrochemical work station at 25 °C. Solutions were freshly prepared before each experiment. A platinum foil (3.0 cm2) was used as counter electrode. All the potentials were measured versus a saturated calomel electrode (SCE, 0.241 V vs. NHE) electrode. CV data were recorded between −0.95 to 0.40 V with a scan rate at 50 mV s−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of CeO₂ Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CeO2 nanoparticle (NP) dry powder was weighed and then suspended in deionized water by vortexing and bath sonication (Branson, model 2510, 100 W output power; 42 kHz frequency) to yield a stock solution of 5 mg/mL as previously described [6 (link), 22 (link)]. This stock suspension was used as the stock solution for further dispersion in cell culture media. An appropriate amount of the stock solution was added to the cell culture medium to obtain a final concentration of 12.5 (low dose) or 25 (high dose) μg/mL. The diluted NP suspension in the cell culture medium was vortexed (15 s) and sonicated (15 min) in a water bath sonicator, followed by another 15 s vortex to obtain the final suspension. A ZetaPALS (Brookhaven Instruments Corporation, Holtsville, NY, USA) was used to measure the size and zeta-potential of the NP suspension. The primary length and diameter of CeO2 nanomaterials were determined by using transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL JEM 2010, JEOL USA, Inc., Peabody, MA, USA), while the suspended particles were used for assessment of hydrodynamic size and surface charge.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Nano-filler Dispersion Analysis in NR Nanocomposites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Investigation of nano-filler dispersion in the NR nanocomposite samples was carried out by using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (JEOL JEM 2010, JEOL Co., Tokyo, Japan). The ultra-thin section (ca., 100 nm) was cut with a diamond knife at a temperature of −120 °C by using an ultramicrotome (RMC MT-XL, RMC Products Group, Ventana Medical System, Inc., Oro Valley, AZ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of MoO3 Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
With Cu KR radiation (0.15406 nm), the X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra were recorded on a D/MAX-2500 diffraction meter. The operation voltage was maintained at 40 kV and 200 mA.
The transmission electron microscope images (TEM) were taken with a JEOL-JEM2010 operating at 200 kV (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Dropping a diluted dispersion of MoO3-NPs over a conventional carbon-coated (20–30 nm) sheet on a copper grid produced TEM samples.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) was used for obtaining surface images equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence analysis (EDX) that was used to investigate the morphology of samples. The product was applied over the silicon substrate for SEM inspection.
Fourier transformation infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) was acquired with an FT-IR spectrometer. The FT-IR spectra of MoO3-NPs were studied on pellets made by combining the nanoparticles with KBr at around a 1:50 volume ratio.
The UV-visible absorption spectroscopic measurements were performed on a HITACHI U-4100 spectrophotometer using a quartz cell with a width of 1 cm.
Zeta potential measurements is a technique for the assessment of the particle’s surface charge in the solution; this technique is directly related to the stability of MoO3-NPs suspension.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!