The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

15 protocols using iplex platform

1

Genotyping of Malaria Candidate Genetic Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from blood samples as described elsewhere [10 (link)]. The MalariaGEN resource center identified candidate SNPs by analyzing multiple GWASs of severe malaria [3 (link), 4 (link), 6 ] and used the Sequenom iPlex platform [13 (link)] to genotype these loci, as part of a multicenter consortial study described elsewhere [6 ]. The genotyping assays included 114 SNP positions across 40 loci (Supplementary Table 1). Genotyping data from the previously published 68 SNPs, including HbAS (rs334), HbAC (rs33930165), HbE (rs33950507), and ABO blood group (rs8176719 and rs8176746) were used for comparisons [10 (link), 11 (link)]. The α3.7-thalassemia deletion was typed separately by polymerase chain reaction [10 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Polygenic Risk Score for Type 2 Diabetes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from whole blood samples from 537 participants using a Maxiprep kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). We genotyped 336 SNPs associated with type 2 diabetes, obesity or hyperlipidaemia using a Sequenom iPLEX platform (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA) in the year 2014.
We used PLINK 1.9 software (http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/~purcell/plink/) for genotype quality control and clumping [18 (link)]. We used the following parameters for clumping of the genotype data: p value threshold 1, linkage disequilibrium threshold (r2) 0.5, clumping window width 250 kb. Prior to clumping, we excluded all SNPs with a minor allele frequency <0.05, genotyping rate <0.9 and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium p value <1 × 10−4. We also excluded samples if data on >10% of SNPs were missing. After quality control, there were 537 samples with genotype data on 195 SNPs. We used PRSice 2.1 [19 (link)] to calculate the PRS, using the genotype quality control settings recommended by the software developers [20 (link)]. For the SNP weights, we used the effect-size estimates obtained from Xue et al [21 (link)]. We applied a p value threshold of 5 × 10−8 for including type 2 diabetes-associated SNPs in the PRS. This resulted in inclusion of 50 SNPs in the PRS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genotyping and Replication Study for Linkage and GWAS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genotyping for the linkage study and genome-wide association study was undertaken on the Affymetrix SNP 6.0 array, according to manufacturer’s instructions, in two batches. The first batch was genotyped at Almac Diagnostics (Craigavon, Northern Ireland—UK families 1 to 9 inclusive) and the second at AROS Applied Biotechnology (Aarhus, Denmark—Norwegian families 10 to 20 and UK families 21 to 23 inclusive). To ensure genotyping fidelity, one sample was genotyped twice, once in each batch and the results were found to be comparable. Called genotype results were returned for each genotyped individual by the provider. Following the linkage and association analyses, results were analysed. A replication study was then planned to further investigate two of the linked regions. For the replication study, 64 HapMap tag SNPs were selected and genotyped at CIGMR, Manchester, on the Sequenom iPlex platform as per the manufacturer’s instructions in UK, Norwegian and Swedish AAD case-control cohorts (primer sequences available in S1 Table).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SNP Genotyping and Cluster Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We selected independent SNPs with PCA-adjusted and/or unadjusted P values less than 1.0 × 105 for the replication study. Genotyping for replication was performed using the iPLEX platform (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, Supplementary Data 6). To exclude possible genotyping error, the genotype cluster plots of the selected SNPs for the discovery and replication stages were generated and visually inspected (Supplementary Figures 9 and 10).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genetic Profiling of GENESIS-PRAXY and VIRGO Cohorts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA extraction, plating, quantification, and quality-control tests of the GENESIS-PRAXY samples were carried out by McGill University and the Genome Quebec Innovation Centre. SNP genotyping was performed using the Sequenom iPLEX platform (Sequenom Inc, San Diego, CA).23 (link) Genotypes for the VIRGO cohort were obtained from whole-genome sequencing data provided by the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT (Cambridge, MA).24 (link) Deep-coverage sequencing was performed using the Illumina HiSeqX platform (Illumina Inc, San Diego, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genotyping Complement Pathway Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polymorphisms of complement pathway genes were investigated using the Sequenom iPLEX platform. PCR and primer extension oligonucleotides were designed using the My Sequenom Online Tools (Sequenom Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), with a target PCR fragment length of between 80 and 120 bp and target primer extension oligonucleotide of between 15 and 30 bases, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Oligonucleotide sequences are shown in S2 Table. Shrimp alkaline phosphatase was used to neutralise unincorporated dNTPs after the PCR reaction and the iPLEX Gold resin used for final conditioning after primer extension. The reaction product was nanodispensed onto an array chip by technical staff in the Queen’s University Belfast Genome Core using the MassARRAY nanodispenser prior to operation of the MassARRAY mass spectrometer. Genotyping was then carried out using TYPER software (Sequenom). Each SNP cluster plot was inspected individually for quality of clustering and the mass spectrometry plot examined for potentially erroneous base calls, which were recalled or set to missing if a problem was observed. Data were exported from TYPER and converted to PLINK format using Microsoft Excel 2010.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genotyping of Genetic Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genotyping for replication I was performed using the iPLEX platform (Sequenom, San Diego, CA), and replications II and III were performed using the ligation detection reaction method30 (link)31 (link), with technical support from the Shanghai Biowing Applied Biotechnology Company.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Genotyping G6PD SNPs from PEP DNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from blood samples using Nucleon BACC2 DNA extraction kits [Gen-Probe Life Sciences, Tepnel Research Products and Services, Manchester, UK]. Five nano-grammes of gDNA was whole-genome amplified by primer-extension pre-amplification (PEP) using N15 primers (Sigma, UK) and Biotaq (Bioline, UK) polymerase as previously described by Zhang et al. [17 (link)]. Sixty-eight single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in the G6PD gene and its flanking regions were selected from the many hundreds of SNPs identified in the literature and on public databases based on the given criteria (1) previous associations with malaria, (2) predicted functional consequences with respect to G6PD enzyme activity (3) estimated minor allele frequency and (4) whether they made a viable Sequenom assay design [18 (link)]. Three gender-typing markers were also included. Assays were performed using the Sequenom® iPLEX platform according to manufacturer’s instruction using diluted PEP DNA (1:10). Genotype calls were made using the Sequenom® Typer v4.03 software [19 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genotyping of BMI-Associated SNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 31 BMI SNPs were genotyped using the Sequenom iPLEX platform, the Taqman allelic discrimination method, or the KASPar allelic discrimination method. Detailed information regarding selected SNPs, genotyping methods, quality control and related parameters are described in Supplementary Table 1. The average genotyping success rate was 97.2% and the distribution of genotype frequencies for each SNP were in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium P>0.001 (Bonferroni-corrected P-value for 31 SNPs at level α=0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Melanoma Cell Line Characterization and Drug Screening

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human patient-derived melanoma cell lines were cultured in DMEM medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum and grown at 37°C in 5% CO2. All cell lines were periodically authenticated by DNA finger printing using Life Technologies AmpFISTR Identifier microsatellite kit and tested for mycoplasma by Lonza Mycoalert Assay. Genomic DNA was analyzed for mutations in BRAF, PTEN, NRAS, KIT, CDKN2A, RB, TP53 by the nucleotide extension assay using the iPlex platform (Sequenom, Inc, San Diego, CA) as previously described [40 (link)]. RO4929097, PLX4032, PD0325901, AZD8055, GDC0941, BEZ235 were obtained from SelleckChem (Houston, TX). Cell Viability was determined using MTS assays as previously described [32 ]. IC50 values and maximum inhibitory activity (Amax) were calculated using GraphPad Prism 5 (GraphPad Software Inc.). Amax is defined as the maximal activity of the compound and measures its efficacy in reducing viability.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!