The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Hot firepol evagreen qpcr mix

Manufactured by Solis BioDyne
Sourced in Estonia

HOT FIREPol EvaGreen qPCR Mix is a ready-to-use solution for quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis. It contains all the necessary components for efficient and sensitive real-time detection of target DNA sequences, including the EvaGreen fluorescent dye for DNA-binding detection.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

31 protocols using hot firepol evagreen qpcr mix

1

Quantitative PCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from HMDMs as described previously [10 (link),13 (link)] employing the High Pure RNA Isolation Kit (11828665001; Roche Diagnostics International, Rotkreuz, Switzerland), and the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (4368813; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. qPCR was performed employing a CFX96 Touch™ Real-Time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The reaction protocol was 95 °C for 15 s, followed by 40 cycles of 94 °C for 20 s, 60 or 61 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 20 s. Then, 5× Hot FirePOl EvaGreen qPCR Mix (08-25-00020; Solis BioDyne, Tartu, Estonia) was employed for gene expression analysis with primers as shown in Table 3.
Data were analysed by absolute quantification using a standard curve of the PCR product cloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, Walldorf, Germany). All samples and standards were analysed in triplicates and melting curve analysis was performed as a quality control. Data were normalized to the housekeeping gene 18S.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Total RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR Analysis in M. truncatula

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from c.50 mg Mtruncatula leaves using the Nucleospin RNA Plant kit (Macherey‐Nagel) with on‐column DNase treatment. First‐strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg of total RNA using the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio‐Rad) or PrimeScript cDNA synthesis kit (Takara‐Bio Inc.). Four‐fold diluted cDNA was used for RT‐qPCR using the 5× HOT FIREPol EvaGreen qPCR mix (Solis BioDyne) or TB Green Premix qPCR mix (Takara‐Bio Inc.) in a QuantStudio 6 Flex Real‐Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Three independent biological replicates were processed. MtUbiquitin (UBQ; Medtr3g092130) was used as the internal control due to its invariant expression across infection time points and genotypes (Figure S3). Relative expression was calculated using LinRegPCR v. 2015.1 (Ruijter et al., 2009 (link)). Primers were designed using NCBI Primer‐Blast (Table S2) and product specificity was confirmed by melt curve analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA Isolation and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated using the High Pure RNA Isolation Kit (#11828665001, Roche). Concentration of isolated RNA was quantified by NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and RNA with an A260/A280 ratio higher than 1.7 was used for further experiments. RNA was reverse transcribed using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (#4368813, Thermo Fisher Scientific) in the presence of an RNase inhibitor (#10777-019, Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was analyzed using 5 × HotFirePol EvaGreen qPCR Mix (#08-25-00020, Solis BioDyne) with a CFX96 real-time PCR system (Bio-Rad). Primer sequences can be found in Supplementary table S1. qPCR data were analyzed with the Bio-Rad CFX Maestro 1.1 Software 2017 (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Reference genes were discriminated based on the GeNorm algorithm [42 (link)] which is included in the Maestro software. 18S was found to be more stable in its expression pattern compared to ACTB due to a lower M value (internal control gene-stability measure, M < 0.5). Consequently, data were normalized to 18S and are shown relative to the control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Molecular Assays for Cellular Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All reagents, if not separately mentioned, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany). The 5×HOT FIREPol EvaGreen qPCR Mix was from Solis BioDyne (Lithuania). The M-MLV reverse transcriptase, Trizol reagent and Fluo-4 Direct Calcium Assay Kit were from Life Technologies (USA). We obtained the CytoTox-ONE assay from Promega (USA). The ATPLite 1 step Luminescence Assay System was purchased in Perkin-Elmer (USA). Primers were synthesized in the Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics (Poland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Vertebrate Host Identification from Mosquito Blood-Meals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We carried out blood-meal analysis on each individually extracted blood-fed mosquito to determine its vertebrate host. We used primers for cytochrome b (cyt b) and 16S rRNA markers to resolve the vertebrate host source of the blood-meals [25 (link)]. Total nucleic acid (1 μl) from each blood-fed mosquito was used as template in 10-μl PCRs containing 2 μl of 5X HOT FIREPol® EvaGreen® qPCR Mix (Solis BioDyne, Estonia) and 10 pmoles of each forward/reverse primer. Thermo-cycling and high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis were carried out in a Rotor-Gene Q real-time PCR thermo-cycler (Qiagen, Hilden Germany) as previously described [26 (link)]. DNA extracted from human, cattle, sheep, goat, pig, camel, and chicken samples served as positive controls in each of the runs. Rotor-Gene Q software 2.1.0 was used to select representative amplicons for post-PCR clean (Exo 1-rSAP combination, Biolabs, UK) and sequencing at Macrogen (The Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Gene Expression Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All cells harvested for gene expression analysis were cultured in six‐well plates. Total RNA was extracted using the TRIzol® reagent (Thermo Fisher, Cat# 15596026) according to manufacturer's instructions. Reverse transcription of total RNA into complementary DNA (cDNA) was performed using SuperScript® III First‐Strand Synthesis System (Thermo Fisher, Cat# 18080051) on S1000 Thermal Cycler (Bio‐Rad) according to manufacturer's instructions. cDNA for 1–5 μg of total RNA were synthesized per reaction. The reverse transcription product was diluted with DEPC‐treated water to achieve final concentration of 5 ng/μl total RNA converted to cDNA for real‐time semi‐quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). qPCR was performed with 5X HOT FIREPol® EvaGreen® qPCR Mix (Solis Biodyne, Cat# 08‐24‐00001) on either MJ Research PTC‐200 Thermal Cycler (Bio‐Rad) or Applied Biosystems QuantStudio 7 Flex Real‐Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher) according to manufacturer's instructions. HOT FIREPol® DNA Polymerase was activated first at 95°C for 15 min, followed by 45 cycles of (1) denaturation of cDNA at 95°C for 30 s, (2) annealing of primers at 60°C for 30 s, and (3) elongation at 72°C for 30 s. Relative expression of each gene was calculated by normalizing its CT values to that of glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). List of primers is provided in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative analysis of TET genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following Chomczynski`s protocol (27 (link)), total RNA of glioma tissues was extracted by TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies), whereas Total RNA Mini Concentrator Kit (A&A Biotechnology) was used for the extraction of RNA from plasma samples. The concentration and purity of RNA samples were assessed by measuring the 260/280 ratio of absorbance values with the Synergy H4 spectrophotometer (BioTek). cDNA was synthesized from 500 ng of RNA using random hexamers and TaqMan Reverse Transcription Reagents (ThermoFisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer`s instructions. Transcript levels of TET family genes were determined by the quantitative real-time PCR using 5x HOT FirePolEvaGreen qPCR Mix (Solis Biodyne) and primer sets for TET1, TET2, TET3, and the housekeeping gene GAPDH. The primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S1. All samples were run in triplicate, and data were normalized to the expression of GAPDH (28 (link)), according to the ΔCt method. While the ΔΔCt method was applied for relative quantification in blood samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Inflammatory Cytokine Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated using the High Pure RNA Isolation Kit (Roche #11828665001), and reverse transcribed using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific #4368813) in the presence of an RNase inhibitor (Invitrogen #10777-019) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was analyzed by qPCR using a 5xHotFirePol EvaGreen qPCR Mix (Solis BioDyne #08-24-00020) and the following primers: hu_TNF_for: 5´CTCCACCCATGTGCTCCTCA3´, hu_TNF_rev: 5´CTCTGCCAGGGGCTCTTGAT3´, hu_IL1B_for: 5´GGCTGCTCTGGGATTCTCTT3´, hu_IL1B_rev: 5´AGTCATCCTCATTGCCACTGTAA3´, hu_IL6_for: 5´ACATCCTCGACGGCATCTCA3´, hu_IL6_rev: 5´TCACCAGGCAAGTCTCCTCATT3´, hu_IL10_for: 5´CAACAGAAGCTTCCATTCCA 3´, hu_IL10_rev: 5´AGCAGTTAGGAAGCCCCAAG3´, mu_Il1b_for: 5´CCAAAAGATGAAGGGCTGCTT3´, mu_Il1b_rev:5´ GGAAGGTCCACGGGAAAGAC3´, mu_Il6_for: 5´AAGAAATGATGGATGCTACCAAACTG3´, mu_Il6_rev: 5´GTACTCCAGAAGACCAGAGGAAATT3´, mu_Tgfb_for: 5´ACCCTGCCCCTATATTTGGA3´, mu_Tgfb_rev: 5´CGGGTTGTGTTGGTTGTAGAG3´, mu_Tnf_for: 5´CCATTCCTGAGTTCTGCAAAGG3´, mu_Tnf_rev: 5´AGGTAGGAAGGCCTGAGATCTTATC3´. The PCR was performed in a CFX96 touch™ Real-Time PCR detection system (BioRad). Data was normalized to the housekeeping gene RNA18S.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of HPV Genome Copy Number

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Equal amounts of total DNA were digested with DpnI to remove the input DNA and with an HPV18 genome-linearizing enzyme. The reaction mix was diluted, and 1 ng of total DNA was used in a single PCR, along with 300 nM forward and reverse primers, 2 μl of commercial master mix and 5x HOT FIREPol EvaGreen qPCR mix (Solis BioDyne) in a 10 μl total reaction volume. Amplification was performed on a 7900HT Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). The comparative threshold cycle (ΔΔCt) method was used for the HPV genome quantification shown in Fig 1 by comparing HPV genome-specific signals to the signals of a reference (ribosomal DNA: rDNA) in the cellular genome. The change in the threshold cycle value (ΔCt) of the sequence of interest (HPV, rDNA, and alpha-amylase (Amy)) was used to quantitate the relative amounts of newly synthesized DNA. The following primers were used: HPV18, GTGCATCCCAGCAGTAAG and AAACCAGCCGTTACAACC; rDNA, GCGGCGTTATTCCCATGACC and GGAATTGACGGAAGGGCACC; Amy, ACTCAAGGTAAGTAACAGCCCACGG and CTACACGTGGCTTGGTCACTTCATG.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Evaluating Macrophage Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vitro differentiated and polarized HMDMs (polarized for 21 h) were treated for 7 h with 50 nM thioA or solvent control, respectively. Total RNA from treated cells was isolated using the High Pure RNA Isolation Kit (Roche #11828665001). Equal amounts of RNA were transcribed with the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific #4368813) in the presence of an RNase inhibitor (Invitrogen #10777-019) according to manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was analyzed in qPCR using 5xHotFirePol EvaGreen qPCR Mix (Solis BioDyne, Tartu, Estonia, #08-24-00020) and the primers listed in Table 3. The PCR was performed in a CFX96 touch Real-Time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad). Data were normalized to the housekeeping gene RNA18S.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!