The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti cd25 antibody

Manufactured by BioLegend
Sourced in United States

The Anti-CD25 antibody is a laboratory reagent used for the detection and analysis of CD25, a cell surface marker expressed on activated T cells and regulatory T cells. This antibody can be used in various immunological techniques, such as flow cytometry, to identify and characterize cell populations expressing CD25.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using anti cd25 antibody

1

Maraviroc and Mouse Chemokine Analyses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Maraviroc was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) (for in vitro experiments) or GlaxoSmithKline (Brentford, UK) (for in vivo experiments). Mouse CCL3 was obtained from Peprotech (Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). The following antibodies were used as the primary antibodies for immunohistochemical analyses: goat anti-CCR5 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), rat anti-Ly6G antibody (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), rat anti-F4/80 antibody (Serotec, Kidlington, UK), mouse anti-α-SMA antibody (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), rabbit anti-type I collagen antibody, rabbit anti-CD31 antibody and rabbit anti-EGF antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). The following rat anti-mouse antibodies were used as the primary antibodies for the flow cytometric analysis: anti-CD11b antibody (BD Biosciences), anti-CD25 antibody (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-CD45 antibody (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-F4/80 antibody (eBioscience), anti-Foxp3 antibody (eBioscience), anti-Ly6G antibody (Gr-1) (Tonbo Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-MIP-1α antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), anti-CCR5 antibody (BioLegend), and isotype-matched control IgGs for individual rat antibodies (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Flow Cytometric Analysis of Tregs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Freshly isolated cells were incubated with Fc Block for 25 min at 4 °C and then stained with anti-CD4 antibody (#GK1.5, BioLegend), anti-CD25 antibody (#PC61, Biolegend) and anti-CD3e antibody (#145-2C11, Biolegend). Intracellular staining of Foxp3 was conducted by using the Foxp3/transcription factor staining buffer set, according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer (eBioscience). For Foxp3 staining, Foxp3-antibody (#fjk-16s, eBioscience) was added, followed by additional double washing. The washed cells were analyzed with FACSVerse (BD Biosciences). Tregs were identified by gating on the CD4+ Foxp3+ cell population.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

CellTrace Violet Staining for Cell Division

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cultured T cells were counted, spun down, and resuspended in CellTrace Violet staining solution (1:1,000 in PBS, Invitrogen, #C34571) in 1 ml per 106 cells. Staining solution was incubated at 37°C for 20 min, then quenched with prewarmed cell‐culture medium (5× volume of staining solution). Cells were then spun down and plated. Four days later, cells were collected, washed once in PBS, and stained with LIVE/DEAD™ Fixable Near‐IR (1:1,000 in PBS; Thermo Fisher Scientific, #L10119) in 50 μl for 20 min at RT in the dark. Cells were washed again in FACS buffer (2% FCS (v/v) PBS + 2 mM EDTA), then stained with anti‐CD25 antibody (1:40 in FACS buffer; BioLegend, #356106) in 50 μl for 30 min on ice in the dark. Before analysis on a BDFortessa cytometer (see Fig EV4F for gating strategy), cells were washed twice with FACS buffer. For quantification, individual generations for each peak were calculated using a computer‐generated model fitted to the CTV profile by FlowJo. Then, the estimated total number of divisions was divided by the estimated total number of cells, resulting in the division index. Division indices of treated samples were normalized to the nontreated controls by calculating the log2‐transformed fold change (log2FC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Activation of Murine CD4+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Clea (Clea Japan, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Total CD4+ T cells isolated from mouse spleen were prepared using a FITC anti-mouse CD4 antibody (Cat#100510, RM4–5, BioLegend) and anti-FITC-microbeads (Cat#130-097-050, Miltenyi Biotec). Naive CD4+ T cells (CD44low, CD62Lhigh) were prepared using a MojoSort Mouse CD4 T cell Isolation Kit (Cat#480033), BioLegend). Biotinylated anti-CD44 (Cat#103004, IM7) and anti-CD25 antibodies (Cat#102004, PC61) were purchased from BioLegend. CD4+ T cells (7.5 × 105) were stimulated using immobilized anti-TCR-β mAb (3 µg/mL, H57–597, BioLegend) plus an anti-CD28 mAb (1.0 µg/mL, cat#40–0281, TONBO Biosciences) for 2 days, and then, the cells were further expanded under similar conditions for an additional 3 days. IL-2 conditions: IL-2 (10 ng/mL, Pepro Tech); Th2 conditions: IL-2 (10 ng/mL, Pepro Tech), IL-4 (1 ng/mL, Pepro Tech), and anti-IFN-γ mAb (2.5 µg/mL, cat#40–731, TONBO Biosciences). Th1 conditions: IL-2 (10 ng/mL, Pepro Tech), IL-12 (1 ng/mL, Pepro Tech), and anti-IL-4 mAb (2.5 µg/mL, cat#40–731, TONBO Biosciences). The cultured cells were subjected to intracellular staining, ELISA assay, and RT-PCR. All animal experiments received approval from the Ehime University Administrative Panel for Animal Care. All animal care was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of Ehime University.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying T-cell Subsets in Autoimmune Hepatitis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBMCs were isolated from AIH patients and healthy volunteers as mentioned above. In addition, single-cell suspensions were obtained by mechanical disruption of mouse spleens through 70-μm cell strainers. Erythrocytes were lysed using lysis buffer. Then, the freshly collected cells were resuspended in 100 μl of PBS and incubated with anti-CD3, anti-CD4, and anti-CD8a antibodies (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, United States ) at 4°C for 30 min. To detect Treg subpopulations, intracellular staining was performed using a transcription factor buffer set (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, United States ). After staining with anti-CD4 and anti-CD25 antibodies, the cells were fixed, permeabilized, and incubated with an anti-FOXP3 antibody (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, United States ). The frequencies of CD4+ CD25+ FOXP3+ Tregs, CD3+ CD4+ T cells, and CD3+ CD8a+ T cells were examined using a flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!