The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss 14 0 for windows version 14

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS 14.0 for Windows, version 14.0.1 is a software package used for statistical analysis. It provides a wide range of statistical and data management capabilities for researchers and analysts.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

3 protocols using spss 14 0 for windows version 14

1

Survival Analysis of Dental Implants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The quantitative data were expressed as average values, standard deviations, and ranges of minimum and maximum. The qualitative data were expressed as frequencies and percentages. The survival of the implants was calculated and plotted according to the Kaplan–Meier method, with removal or change of any component as the endpoint.
The implants were followed until the last date of observation (date of death or 31 January 2023). Data analysis was undertaken using the chi squared test. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 14.0 for Windows, version 14.0.1 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). A p-value = 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Revision Rates in UKA Procedures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Preoperative features, demographics and causes of revision were presented as percentages of the total cohort. Complication rates were compared using Chi Square analysis. The survival curves were calculated and plotted using Kaplan–Meier method.
Differences between groups were considered as statistically significant for p values < 0.05. The Cox multiple regression model was considered to calculate the hazard ratio.
The proportionality hazards assumption was tested by the Schoenfeld residual method; the Wald test was used to calculate the p values for data obtained from the Cox multiple regression analyses.
All data came from the registry. The study was a population study including all UKA procedures undertaken on patients living in ER reported by RIPO; therefore, the sample size was not calculated given that all the cases were included.
Revision for any cause was set as the endpoint; revision was defined as the removal or change of any implant that would impact the survival rate.
The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 14.0 for Windows, version 14.0.1 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) and JMP, Version 12.0.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1989–2007).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Survivorship Analysis of Primary THA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient demographics, preoperative diagnoses, and causes of revision were presented as percentages. Fisher's exact test was used to detect differences between cohorts in numbers and types of complications and the timing of complications. Continuous variables were compared between groups using independent samples t-test. The survivorship of the primary THA implants was calculated and plotted according to the Kaplan-Meier method. The study's endpoints were revisions for any reason and revisions due to mechanical complications (aseptic loosening, dislocation or instability, polyethylene wear, implant breakage and impingement, severe stiffness, and metallosis). The revision event was defined as the removal or change of any component. The implants were followed until the last observation date (date of death or 31 December 2019). Mann-Whitney U test was used to detect differences between the survivorship curves. The threshold for significance was p = 0.05 for all the tests. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 14.0 for Windows, version 14.0.1 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA) and JMP, version 12.0.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!