The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss vs 21.0

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS (version 21.0) is a software package used for statistical analysis. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data management, analysis, and reporting. SPSS offers a graphical user interface and a wide range of statistical techniques, including descriptive statistics, regression analysis, and multivariate methods.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

2 protocols using spss vs 21.0

1

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (vs 21.0) and included descriptive statistics, cross-tabulations, relevant parametric/non-parametric tests and regression analyses. Continuous variables were tested for normal distribution by Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. For normal distributed continuous variables, means ± standard deviations were calculated. For non-normal distributed continuous variables, medians ± interquartile ranges (IQR) were calculated. Groups with continuous variables were compared with the t-test (normal distribution) or with the Mann–Whitney U test (non-normal distribution). Discrete variables were compared with the chi-square test. Odds ratios were calculated with a logistic regression model, and 95% confidence intervals were reported. Parameters were included in the multifactorial regression if the p value was < 0.1 in the univariate regression model. A two-sided p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comparative Analysis of CB Exposure Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data management and statistical analysis were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) vs 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Two-group t-test was used to compare the difference between CB exposure, recovery, and their respective control, respectively. The comparison between the CB exposure, recovery, and the controls was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by the Dunnett’s multiple comparison test when F was significant compared to the recovery group. Non-parametric statistics were performed to compare the pathological score (Mann–Whitney U-test). The Differences were considered significant when P<0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!