The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Guard column

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in Germany, United States

A guard column is a short, low-capacity chromatography column placed in front of the analytical column in a liquid chromatography (LC) system. Its primary function is to protect the analytical column from contaminants and particulates that could otherwise damage or compromise the performance of the main analytical column.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using guard column

1

Quantification of Plasma LPC Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the addition of nonadecanoyl-LPC as an internal standard, plasma LPC was extracted using the Bligh and Dyer method [24 (link)]. The extract was dried under reduced pressure and reconstituted with methanol. After filtration using a 0.2-μm polytetrafluoroethylene membrane (Millex-LG; Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA), the filtrates were injected into the HPLC (Prominence; SHIMADZU CORPORATION, Kyoto, Japan) combined with an evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD-LTII, SHIMADZU CORPORATION). A Purospher® STAR RP-18 endcapped (5 µm) LiChroCART® (250 × 4 mm) was used as a separate column with a guard column (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). The mobile phases were 75% acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (A) and 2-propanol (B), and the gradient conditions were: A:B = 100:0 for 15 min (1.0 mL/min), changed to 0:100 over 5 min, maintained at 0:100 for 15 min, then changed to 100:0 over 5 min (0.6 mL/min), and maintained at 100:0 for 10 min (1.0 mL/min). The settings for the detector were 40 °C, 350 kPa, and a gain of 12. The detected areas for different concentrations of palmitoyl-LPC standards were converted to a logarithmic scale to generate a fitting curve, and palmitoyl-, stearoyl-, oleoyl-, linoleoyl-, and linolenoyl-LPCs were quantified.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Metabolite Extraction and Liquid Chromatography Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metabolites were extracted from mid-exponential-phase culture pellets (five replicates) with a cold methanol method (40 (link)) and analyzed using an Agilent 6550 Q-TOF apparatus (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Liquid chromatography (LC) separation was conducted on an Agilent 1290 ultrahigh-performance LC (UHPLC) system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) with a 150- by 2.1-mm, 5-µm, 200-Å SeQuant ZIC-pHILIC column (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA) and guard column of 20 by 2.1 mm, 5 µm (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA) (41 (link)). MassHunter (Agilent) was used for initial data analysis, and Metabolite Atlas was used for targeted data analysis. Compounds were confirmed using authentic standards.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Metabolite Extraction and LC-MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were plated in triplicate plus an extra well for cell counting and cultured in standard medium for 18 h. Metabolite extraction buffer (MEB) was prepared composing of 50% methanol and 30% acetonitrile in water and kept at 4 °C. The counting well was then counted using the Invitrogen™ Countess™ automated cell counter based on manufacturer’s instructions to give the total number of cells per well. The media from the replicate wells was removed and the cells were washed once with 1xPBS. Metabolites were then extracted by adding 1 mL MEB per million cells and quickly scraped. The insoluble material was immediately pelleted in a cooled centrifuge (4 °C) at 13,000 rpm for 15 min and the supernatant was collected for subsequent LC–MS analysis. A HILIC column (4.6 × 150 mm, guard column 2.1 × 20 mm, Merck) was used for LC separation. The aqueous mobile phase solvent used was 0.1% formic acid in water (solvent A) and the organic mobile phase was 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile (solvent B). The flow rate was set at 300 μl/min and the column oven set to 30 °C. The mobile phase gradient was described previously4 (link). Subsequent analysis was performed using the Xcalibur Quan Browser software (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

LC-MS/MS analysis of metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS/MS analysis was performed using a Q Exactive Quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer coupled to a Vanquish UHPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The liquid chromatography system was fitted with a Sequant ZIC-pHILIC column (150 mm × 2.1 mm) and guard column (20 mm × 2.1 mm) from Merck Millipore and temperature was maintained at 35°C. The sample (2μL) was separated at a flow rate of 0.1 mL/minute. The mobile phase was composed of 10 mM ammonium carbonate and 0.15% ammonium hydroxide in water (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B). A linear gradient was applied by increasing the concentration of solvent A from 20 to 80% within 22 minutes and then maintained for 7 minutes. The mass spectrometer was operated in full MS and polarity switching mode, in the range of 70-1000m/z and resolution 70000. Major ESI source settings were: spray voltage 3.5 kv, capillary temperature 275°C, sheath gas 35, auxiliary gas 5, AGC target 3e6, and maximum injection time 200 minutes. For the targeted analysis, the acquired spectra were analyzed using XCalibur Qual Browser and XCalibur Quan Browser software (Thermo Scientific). The compound discoverer 3.1 (CD) (Thermo Scientific)) was used for untargeted and novel feature detection and annotation with library scoring. Features with the fold change >2 and p <0.05 were selected as discriminating markers. Samples were analysed by quintuplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Validated HPLC Method for Naftifine Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the HPLC (Shimadzu Model LC 20AT; Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) analysis of naftifine, we used a reversed phase C18 column (4.6×150 mm, 5 μm; EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) preceded by a guard column (4×4 mm, 5 μm, Merck). The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile:tetrahydrofuran:tetramethyl-ammonium hydroxide buffer (pH 7.8) (62:10:28), and the flow rate was fixed at 1.2 mL·min−1. The wavelength of detection was set at 280 nm. The limit of quantification was found to be 0.025 mL·min−1. The method was validated for selectivity, linearity, accuracy, and precision. It was found to be linear between the concentration range of 0.025 μg/mL and 100 μg/mL with a high correlation coefficient (r2>0.999) and was precise (intra- and interday variation <2%) and accurate (mean recovery >99%). Comparison of the chromatograms of samples from the extracted pig and human skin and blank tapes did not reveal any interfering peaks with naftifine confirming the selectivity of the method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPLC Analysis of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All analytical HPLC analyses were performed with the Shimadzu Prominence System (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) consisting of a DGU-20A mobile phase degasser, two LC-20AD solvent delivery units, a SIL-20AC cooling auto sampler, a CTO-10AS column oven and SPD-M20A diode array detector. Chromatographic data were collected and processed using Shimadzu Solution software at a rate of 40 Hz and detector time constant of 0.025 s. The Chromolith Performance RP-18e monolithic column (100 × 3 mm i.d., Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) coupled with a guard column (5 × 4.6 mm; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was used. Mobile phase acetonitrile/water/formic acid (80/20/0.1, v/v/v, phase A) and acetonitrile/water/formic acid (5/95/0.1, v/v/v, phase B) were employed in the analyses; gradient: 0–10 min 7%–80% A; 10–12 min 80% A, 12–14 min 80%–7% A. The flow rate was 1.2 mL/min at 25 °C. The photodiode array (PDA) data were acquired in the 200–450 nm range, and 360 nm signals were extracted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Amino Acid Analysis of Fresh CCF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A reversed phase high performance liquid chromatographic method was adopted to analyze amino-acid content of fresh CCF. The sample was derivatized for volatility suitable for amino-acid analyzing using FMOC-Cl (9- fluorenylmethylchloroformate) as derivatization reagent and analyzed using Agilent 1260 Infinity HPLC System (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, California, USA) (Fabiani et al., 2002 (link); Thakur and Sayeed, 2014 ). Detection was carried out using a Diode Array Detector (DAD, λmax = 263nm). The sample was injected onto a C-18 column (4.6mm × 250 mmi.d., 5μm) equipped with a guard column of the same material (Merck). The column operated at a flow rate of 1 ml/min using acetonitrile and water (90:10) as eluent A and sodium acetate (50mM) as eluent B.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

HILIC Separation of Polar Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aliquots of 5 µl  of the processed samples were injected onto a SeQuant ZIC-HILIC column (2.1 × 150 mm polyether ether ketone (PEEK) coated, 3.5 μm, 100 Å, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for the analysis of polar compounds. In addition, a guard column (2.1 × 20 mm PEEK coated, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was installed in front of the column with a coupler. For separation, a gradient elution at a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min using (A) aqueous 20 mM NH4HCO3 and (B) MeCN, both containing 0.01% FA (v/v), was chosen. The initial content of 90% MeCN was decreased to 40% water over 15 min. This mobile phase was kept for 1 min and the MeCN content was increased to 90% over 0.5 min. To ensure full re-equilibration, this composition was kept for another 8 min before injecting the next sample, leading to a total analysis time of 24.5 min. The re-equilibration step used an increased flow rate of 0.5 ml/min between 16 and 22 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

LC-MS Metabolomics Profiling Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS was carried out using a Thermo Ultimate 3000 HPLC in line with a Q Exactive mass spectrometer. A 32 min gradient was developed over a 100 mm × 4.6 mm ZIC pHILIC column with a guard column (Merck-Millipore) from 10% buffer A (20 mM ammonium carbonate) and 90% buffer B (acetonitrile) to 95% buffer A and 5% buffer B. Samples were acquired in positive-negative switching mode, and a standard ESI source and spectrometer settings were applied (typical scan range of 75–1050 Da). Metabolites were identified by standard metabolite matching to m/z and retention time. Integrated peak areas and label incorporation were quantified using AssayR [55 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Metabolite Extraction and LC-MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CiPTEC cells were washed with ice cold PBS, and metabolites were extracted in 1 ml lysis buffer containing methanol/acetonitrile/dH2O (2:2:1). Samples were centrifuged at 16,000 g for 15 min at 4°C, and supernatants were collected for LC‐MS analysis.
LC‐MS analysis was performed on an Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) coupled to a Dionex Ultimate 3000 autosampler and pump (Thermo Scientific). The MS operated in polarity‐switching mode with spray voltages of 4.5 kV and −3.5 kV. Metabolites were separated using a Sequant ZIC‐pHILIC column (2.1 × 150 mm, 5 μm, guard column 2.1 × 20 mm, 5 μm; Merck) with elution buffers acetonitrile (A) and eluent B (20 mM (NH4)2CO3, 0.1% NH4OH in ULC/MS grade water (Biosolve)). Gradient ran from 20% eluent B to 60% eluent B in 20 min, followed by a wash step at 80% and equilibration at 20%, with a flow rate of 150 μl/min. Analysis was performed using LCquan software (Thermo Scientific). Metabolites were identified and quantified on the basis of exact mass within 5 ppm and further validated by concordance with retention times of standards. Peak intensities were normalized based on total peak intensities, and data were analysed using MetaboAnalyst (Chong et al, 2019).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!