The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using 4 5 dicaffeoylquinic acid

1

Comprehensive Phytochemical Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Neochlorogenic acid, gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, 1,3-dicaffeoylquinic acid, p-coumaric acid, rutin, quercetin 3-β-galactoside, ferulic acid, taxifolin, 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic acid, trans-m-coumaric acid, quercetin 3-α-L-rhamnoside, 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, rosmarinic acid, myrcetin, luteolin, quercetin, trans-cinnamic acid, apigenin, kaempferol, fenofibrate, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), hematoxylin, eosin, and trizma base were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS), Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), streptomycin, and penicillin were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Other reagents were commercially available and of special grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Standardized Antioxidant Compound Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Water was purified using a Milli–Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Ethanol (96%) was obtained from Vilniaus degtine (Vilnius, Lithuania). Anhydrous acetic acid (99.8%), and hydrochloric acid (37%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Buchs, Switzerland). The following reagents were used: 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) and diammonium salt (ABTS). The following standards were used: 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox), quercetin, chlorogenic acid, apigenin, 4-o-caffeoylquinic acid, 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, neochlorogenic acid, kaempferol-3-rutinoside, and ellagic acid from Sigma-Aldrich (Buchs, Switzerland) and santin from PlantMetaChem (Giesen, Germany). All the reagents and standards were of analytical grade. The stock solutions of phenolic compounds were prepared in 96% ethanol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Chlorogenic Acid Derivatives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC-grade standard substances, namely neochlorogenic acid (5-caffeoylquinic acid), chlorogenic acid (3-caffeoylquinic acid), cryptochlorogenic acid (4-dicaffeoylquinic acid), 4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 1,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid and 3,4-dicaffeoylquinic acid were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich GmbH (Steinheim, Germany). Solvents and other substances were obtained as follows: acetonitrile (purity 99.9%) and methanol (purity 99.9%) from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany); trifluoroacetic acid (purity 99.8%) supplied from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany); 2,2’-Azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) di-ammonium salt (ABTS) (purity ≥ 98%) and potassium persulphate (purity ≥ 99%) purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA); Trolox (purity ≥ 98%) received from Fluka Chemika (Buchs, Switzerland). Ultrapure water was purified using a Millipore water-cleaning system (Bedford, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Phenolic Acids in Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC, 1290 Infinity Quaternary LC System, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to separate and identify the phenolic acids. The chromatographic system conditions were set as follows: mobile phase, 0.03 M orthophosphoric acid (A) and methanol HPLC grade (B); detector, UV 280-360 nm; column, C18 column (5.0 μm, 4.6 mm inner diameter [ID] × 250 mm); column oven temperature, 35 °C; and flow rate, 1.0 mL/min. Gradient elution was performed as follows: 0–10 min, 10 % B; 10–15 min, 50 % B; 15–20 min, 100 % B; and finally 5 min for washing. All standards (quercetin, luteolin, myricetin, kaempferol, gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, 3,5-Di-caffeoylquinic acid and 4,5-Di-caffeoylquinic acid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (M) Sdn Bhd, Selangor, Malaysia) were dissolved in methanol HPLC grade. Linear regression equations were calculated using Y = aX ± b, where X is the concentration of the related compound and Y the peak area of the compound obtained from UHPLC. The linearity was established by the coefficient of determination (R2). UHPLC analysis was performed in triplicate and values are the average of three replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!