The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using c1000 touch cycler

1

RT-ddPCR Analysis of CD19 and CD22

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells from each condition were collected and RNA was isolated by RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Catalog#74104). RNA quality was checked by high sensitivity RNA ScreenTape assay (Agilent, 4200). RNA quantity was determined by Qubit RNA RS kit (Thermo Fisher). RNA samples were mixed with one step RT-ddPCR advanced kit for probes (Bio-Rad), together with ddPCR GEX primer/probe for CD19 or CD22 (Bio-Rad) in a 96 well plate to generate RT-PCR reaction mix. Reaction droplets were generated by QX200 AutoDG droplet generator, PCR reaction was performed by C1000 Touch Cycler (Bio-Rad). RT-PCR droplets were read by QX200 droplet digital PCR system and data was analyzed using Quantasoft (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genetic Lineage Tracing in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Axin2-CreERT2, Dmp1-Cre, Gli1–CreERT2, Gli1–LacZ, Igf1rflox/flox, Ror2flox/flox, Rosa26<fs-tdTomato>, Wnt5aflox/flox, and Wlsflox/flox mouse strains were cross-bred as needed for this study. All mouse experiments were conducted in accordance with protocol 20299 approved by the Department of Animal Resources and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Southern California.
Mice were housed in pathogen-free conditions, identified via ear tags, and analyzed in a mixed background. Tail biopsies were lysed through incubation at 55°C overnight in DirectPCR tail solution (Viagen 102 T) followed by 30 min of heat inactivation at 85°C prior to PCR-based genotyping (GoTaq Green MasterMix, Promega, and C1000 Touch Cycler, Bio-rad). Mice were euthanized by carbon dioxide overdose followed by cervical dislocation. All mice were used for analysis regardless of sex.
For CreERT2 activation, tamoxifen (Sigma) was dissolved in corn oil (20 mg/ml) and injected intraperitoneally.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genetic Toolkit for Skeletal Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Arid1afl/fl (Gao et al., 2008 (link)), Dmp1-Cre (Lu et al., 2007 (link)), Ezh2fl/fl (Shen et al., 2008 (link)), Krt14-Cre (Fell et al., 2014 (link)), and Osr2-Cre (gift from Rulang Jiang, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Tian et al., 2017 (link)) mouse lines were used and cross-bred as needed in this study. All mouse experiments were conducted in accordance with protocols approved by the Department of Animal Resources and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Southern California.
All mice were housed in pathogen-free conditions and analyzed in a mixed background. Mice were identified by ear tags. Genotyping was conducted on tail samples. Tail biopsies were lysed through incubation at 55°C overnight in DirectPCR tail solution (Viagen 102 T) followed by 85°C heat inactivation for 30 min and PCR-based genotyping (GoTaq Green MasterMix, Promega, and C1000 Touch Cycler, Bio-rad). Mice were euthanized by carbon dioxide overdose followed by cervical dislocation. All mice were used for analysis regardless of sex.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Transgene Verification in Chrysanthemum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For confirming the presence of the transgene in putative three transgenic plants and stable transgene transfer via stem cuttings, genomic DNA was extracted from chrysanthemum leaves using a Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR was performed using primer set PANS-F and CmDFR-sense-R for the presence of the transgene and primer set CmDFR-ORF-F/CmDFR-sense-R for the intactness of genomic DNA. PCR was performed with a C1000 touch cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) with the conditions as follows: denaturation at 98 °C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 68 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 5 min. PCR products were visualized using 1% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis followed by ethidium bromide staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genetic Lineage Tracing in Mice for Bone Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice used in this study included Gli1-CreERT2 knock-in (JAX#007913), ROSA26loxp-STOP-loxp-tdTomato conditional reporter (JAX#007905, (Madisen et al., 2010 (link)), Gli1-LacZ heterozygotes (JAX#008211, (Bai et al., 2002 (link)), Sox2-CreERT2 knock-in (JAX#017593, (Li et al., 2015 (link)), Runx2-rtTA (gift from Fanxin Long, Washington University School of Medicine; (Chen et al., 2014 (link)), tetO-Cre (JAX#006234), C57BL/6J (JAX#000664), and Runx2flox/flox (gift from Dr. Takeshi Takarada, Okayama University, Japan; (Takarada et al., 2013 (link)). Mice were housed in pathogen-free conditions and analyzed in a mixed background. All mice were used for analysis without consideration of sex. All mice were induced at one month of age and euthanized at specific stage as described in figure legend. Genotyping was performed from ear biopsies, which were lysed in DirectPCR tail solution (Viagen 102 T) through incubation at 55°C overnight followed by 85°C heat inactivation for 30 min. PCR-based genotyping (GoTaq Green MasterMix, Promega, and C1000Touch Cycler, Bio-rad) was conducted to identify the mouse lines. All mouse experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Southern California.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Generation of Wnt1-Cre;Kdm6b-deficient Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To generate Wnt1Cre;Kdm6bfl/fl mice, we crossed Wnt1Cre;Kdm6bfl/+ mice with Kdm6bfl/fl mice (Zhao et al., 2008 (link); Manna et al., 2015 (link)). Reporter mice used in this study were tdTomato conditional reporter (JAX#007905) (Madisen et al., 2010 (link)). Ezh2fl/fl and Trp53fl/fl mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (JAX#022616, #008462) (Marino et al., 2000 (link); Shen et al., 2008 (link)). Genotyping was carried out as previously described (Zhao et al., 2008 (link)). Briefly, tail samples were lysed by using DirectPCR tail solution (Viagen 102T) with overnight incubation at 55°C. After heat inactivation at 85°C for 1 hr, PCR-based genotyping (GoTaq Green MasterMix, Promega, and C1000 Touch Cycler, Bio-Rad) was used to detect the genes. All mouse studies were conducted with protocols approved by the Department of Animal Resources and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of Southern California (Protocols 9320 and 20299).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genetic Lineage Tracing in Mice for Bone Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice used in this study included Gli1-CreERT2 knock-in (JAX#007913), ROSA26loxp-STOP-loxp-tdTomato conditional reporter (JAX#007905, (Madisen et al., 2010 (link)), Gli1-LacZ heterozygotes (JAX#008211, (Bai et al., 2002 (link)), Sox2-CreERT2 knock-in (JAX#017593, (Li et al., 2015 (link)), Runx2-rtTA (gift from Fanxin Long, Washington University School of Medicine; (Chen et al., 2014 (link)), tetO-Cre (JAX#006234), C57BL/6J (JAX#000664), and Runx2flox/flox (gift from Dr. Takeshi Takarada, Okayama University, Japan; (Takarada et al., 2013 (link)). Mice were housed in pathogen-free conditions and analyzed in a mixed background. All mice were used for analysis without consideration of sex. All mice were induced at one month of age and euthanized at specific stage as described in figure legend. Genotyping was performed from ear biopsies, which were lysed in DirectPCR tail solution (Viagen 102 T) through incubation at 55°C overnight followed by 85°C heat inactivation for 30 min. PCR-based genotyping (GoTaq Green MasterMix, Promega, and C1000Touch Cycler, Bio-rad) was conducted to identify the mouse lines. All mouse experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Southern California.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

RT-qPCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using RNeasy Plus Mini kit (Qiagen) and extracted RNA was treated by TURBO DNase (Ambion). cDNA was reverse transcribed from RNA using a QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen) with gDNA wipeout treatment. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using the C1000Touch cycler (Bio-Rad) for Sybr Green (HEK293T and mouse NPCs) or ABI 7900 instrument (Applied Biosystems) for Taqman (mouse NPCs). Real time qPCR with Taqman assay was performed in duplex with Gapdh (Mm99999915_g1, Life Technologies) as a reference gene; cycling conditions were 50°C for 2 min and 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min. No template and no reverse transcription (RT) controls were included. Expression levels were determined relative to Gapdh or β-actin using the delta delta Ct method. siRNA sequence and primers used for qRT-PCR are listed in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative RT-PCR gene expression analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using RNABee (Tel‐Test) or TRIzol (Invitrogen) reagent and reverse transcribed into cDNA using the Superscript III Kit (Invitrogen). Quantitative RT–PCR was performed using the C1000 Touch cycler (Bio‐Rad). See Table EV1 for primer information. Gene expression was normalized to β‐actin, and the relative gene expression was calculated using the ∆∆Ct method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Characterization of iPSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from iPSCs submitted to the EB protocol (passage 10) or the neural crest protocol (passage 20) using Trizol (Invitrogen). M−MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega) and SYBR Green (Bio-Rad) were used for qRT-PCR in a C1000-Touch cycler (Bio-Rad). Results were normalized against reference genes 18S/CREBBP (Table 2).

Characterization and validation.

ClassificationTestResultData
MorphologyPhase contrast bright-field microscopyNormal morphologyFig. 1 panel A
PhenotypeQualitative analysis: immunocytochemistryPositive for NANOG, OCT4, SOX2Fig. 1 panel B
Quantitative analysis: flow cytometryPercentage of cells double-labelled with TRA-1–81 and SSEA-4 was superior to 88Fig. 1 panel C
GenotypeKaryotype (G-banding) and resolutionNo gross chromosomal alteration by reprogramming was detectedResolution 400Supplementary Fig. 1A
IdentitySTR analysis16 sites tested:all matched except for one alleleSubmitted in archive with journal
Mutation analysisSequencingHeterozygous mutation in PAX3NM_181457.4c.-70_85 + 366delFig. 1 panel D
Microbiology and virologyMycoplasmaMycoplasma testing by PCR. All negative.Supplementary Fig. 1B
Differentiation potentialEmbryoid bodyExpression of ectodermal (PAX6, P63 or NESTIN), mesodermal (HAND1, T(Brach) or SMA) and endodermal (GATA6, EOMES) markers.Fig. 1 panel E
Donor screeningHIV 1 + 2 Hepatitis B, Hepatitis CNegativeNot shown
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!