The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using veleta camera

1

Ultrastructural Analysis of Intestinal Organoids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Organoids of the small intestine and colon were harvested from Atf2-/-/7ko/ko and Atf2wt/wt/7wt/wt mice, immediately after 5 days of recombination and fixed in McDowell fixative containing 4% paraformaldehyde and 1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer. Organoids were postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) in cacodylate buffer. Subsequently, the samples were dehydrated in an alcohol series and embedded in epon (LX-112 resin; Ladd Research, Williston, VT). Then, 80-nm epon sections were cut and collected on formvar-coated grids, counterstained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Sections were examined using a Tecnai-12 G2 Spirit Biotwin electron microscope (Thermo Fisher, Eindhoven, The Netherlands), and images were taken using a Veleta camera with Radius software (EMSIS, Münster, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transmission Electron Microscopy Analysis of Zebrafish ER Ultrastructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis, 1 mpf WT (n= 3), tmem38b-/- (n=3) and tmem38bΔ120-7/Δ120-7 (n=3) were fixed for 24 h at RT in 1.5% v/v PFA (Sigma Aldrich), 1.5% v/v glutaraldehyde (Sigma Aldrich), 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) and 0.001% w/v CaCl2. The samples were decalcified in 0.1 M EDTA for 14 days at 4°C. Samples were rinsed in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer containing 10% sucrose and post fixed for 2 h using 1% w/v OsO4 in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer at pH 7.4. Subsequently, zebrafish were infiltrated with low-viscosity epoxyembedding medium. Ultra-thin (70 nm) sections of the region of interest (vertebral endplate growth zone) were cut using a Reichert Ultracut E ultramicrotome (Reichert-Jung) with a diamond knife (Diatome Ltd.) and mounted on formvar-coated single slot copper grids. The sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and viewed with a Jeol JEM-1010 (Jeol Ltd) TEM operating at 60 kV. Microphotographs were taken with a Veleta camera (Emsis, Germany) (30 (link)). TEM images were used to detect the endoplasmic reticulum cisternae enlargement. The area of ER cisternae in WT, tmem38b-/- and tmem38bΔ120-7/Δ120-7 was measured using LAS v4.13 software (Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Visualizing Hydrogel Microstructure by TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hydrogels were visualized in transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using two approaches: negative staining of native gels and ultrathin sections. Copper TEM grids covered with formvar film preliminary stabilized with carbon evaporation were used for the sample adsorption.
To prepare negatively stained samples, semifluid hydrogels were adsorbed on a TEM grid for 1 min. In the case of more rigid hydrogels, a piece of about 2 mm3 was mixed with 2 μL of distilled water using a needle. Then, a grid was placed onto gel for 1 min, after that visible pieces of gel were gently removed by a needle. The grids with adsorbed samples of hydrogels were contrasted for 10 s on a drop of 2% phosphotungstic acid (pH 0.5). At least 5–6 grid-fields were examined for each sample in TEM.
To prepare ultrathin sections, hydrogels fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde were postfixed in 1% OsO4, routinely dehydrated in ethanol and acetone and embedded in epon-araldit mixture. Ultrathin sections were prepared on a Leica EM UC7 ultratome (Leica Microsystems, Wein, Austria) and routinely contrasted with uranyl acetate and led citrate. All grids were examined in JEM 1400 TEM (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), digital images were collected with a Veleta camera (EMSIS, Muenster, Germany). At least 10 individual ultrathin sections of each sample were examined in TEM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Transmission Electron Microscopy of Nanospecies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All nanospecies obtained in this study were examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). A drop of sample was adsorbed for 1 min on the copper grid covered with formvar film which was pre-stabilized using carbon evaporation. Then excess liquid was pulled back by filter paper, and a grid was placed for 10 s on a drop of 1% uranyl acetate or 2% phosphor-tungstic acid (pH 3.0), excess liquid was collected with filter paper.
Cell pellets for TEM examination were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, postfixed in 1% OsO4 and after routine dehydration were embedded in epon-araldit (SPI, West Chester, PA, USA) mixture. To obtain ultrathin sections, hard blocks were cut on Leica EM UC7 (Leica Microsystems, Wein, Austria) ultratome and routinely contrasted with uranyl acetate and led citrate.
All grids were examined in Jem 1400 TEM (Jeol, Tokyo, Japan) and digital images were collected with Veleta camera (EMSIS, Muenster, Gemany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Vertebral Column Histology and TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
WT (n=1), Chi/+ (n=1) and Chi/+LP (n=1) were selected based on X-rays to be representative for the phenotype, fixed and decalcified as described above for histology, and embedded in epon epoxy medium (64 (link)). Semi-thin 1 μm sagittal sections were cut on a Microm HM360 microtome (Marshall Scientific, Hampton, New Hampshire, USA), stained with toluidine blue at pH 9 for 2 min, rinsed with dH2O and mounted with DPX. For TEM analysis, ultrathin sections (about 70 nm) of the middle plane of the vertebral column were prepared on an UltracutE ultramicrotome (Reichert-Jung, Buffalo, New York, USA), contrasted with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and analysed with a Jeol JEM 1010 transmission electron microscope (Jeol Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) operating at 60 kV. Microphotographs were taken with a Veleta camera (Emsis, Muenster, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ultrastructural Analysis of Epithelial Monolayers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After cytokines stimulation and TEER measurement, transwell membranes were fixed in McDowell fixative containing 4% paraformaldehyde and 1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer for 4 h at RT and later kept at 4°C. Subsequently, samples were postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) in cacodylate buffer, dehydrated in an alcohol series, and embedded in epon (LX-112 resin; Ladd Research, Williston, VT). Subsequently, 80nm epon sections were cut and collected on formvar-coated grids, counterstained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Sections were analyzed using a Tecnai-12 G2 Spirit Biotwin electron microscope (Thermo Fisher, Eindhoven, The Netherlands), and images were acquired via a Veleta camera with Radius software (EMSIS, Münster, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Ultrastructural Analysis of Xanthosoma Pachtaicum Genitalia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Adult females and juveniles of X. pachtaicum were fixed in аn ice-cold Karnovsky fixative (2.5 % glutaraldehyde and 2 % paraformaldehyde in 0.05 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) with 0.25 mg ml−1 MgCl2). After 30 min of pre-fixation by the stock fixer diluted 1 : 1 with 0.05 M sodium cacodylate buffer, the head and tail of each animal were removed, the mid-parts being cut into halves at the vulva level. Thereafter, the pieces–each containing one branch of the female genital system–were fixed in a fresh portion of full Karnovsky fixative overnight at 4 °C. After rinsing in sodium cacodylate buffer solution and post-fixation in 1 % osmium tetroxide in the same buffer for 1 h at room temperature, the specimens were stained en bloc for 1 h in 1 % aqueous uranyl acetate. Then specimens were dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol followed by isopropanol series and embedded in Spurr resin. Thin longitudinal sections cut with a diamond knife (Diatome) using a Leica UC6 ultramicrotome were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and examined by TEM (JEM 1010, JEOL) equipped with a charge-coupled device side-mounted Veleta camera (EMSIS). Parts of the specimens were observed with a Zeiss Sigma 300 VP electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Exosome Uptake and Ultrastructural Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Apex2 staining was done afterward (Lam et al., 2015 (link)). Cells were grown in plastic six-well plates, incubated with 30 pM Flag-Apex2-emGFP-CD63 exosomes for 4 h and then fixed for 1 h on ice with 2% glutaraldehyde and 2% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer with 2 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4. Cells were rinsed and treated for 5 min in 20 mM glycine on ice before the addition of 1.4 mM DAB and 0.03% H2O2 in cold buffer for 5–20 min. Cells were rinsed to stop DAB reaction and postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide (Electron Microscopy Sciences) for 30 min in cold cacodylate buffer. Cells were rinsed, stained overnight at 4°C in 1% uranyl acetate in ddH2O, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, and flat-embedded in Embed-812 resin (Electron Microscopy Science). After polymerization at 60°C overnight, 50-nm sections were cut and poststained with lead citrate and uranyl acetate. Sections were imaged on an 80-kV Philips CM10 transmission electron microscope equipped with a Veleta camera (EMSIS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Negative Staining of Biomolecules for TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 5 μL of the undiluted sample were adsorbed for 60 s to glow-discharged parlodion/carbon-coated copper grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, United States; FCF200-NI). The grids were then blotted, washed three times with ddH2O and negatively stained on two droplets of 2% uranyl acetate solution (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Samples were imaged using a FEI Talos F200C TEM (FEI/Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, United States) operated at 120 kV. Electron micrographs were recorded on a Veleta Camera (EMSIS GmbH, Muenster, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of MMIR Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Morphology and size
distribution were investigated for the three production batches of
MMIR1 and MMIR– by drop casting (20 μg/mL, 2 μL)
and dried overnight on Formvar/Carbon-coated hexagonal copper mesh
grids (FCF200H-CU-TB, Electron Microscopy Sciences). The grids were
observed on a JEM 1010 TEM (Jeol, Ltd., Japan) equipped with a charge-coupled
device side-mounted Veleta camera (Emsis, Germany). NP size was measured
manually using ImageJ software (NIH, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!