The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Durogesic

Manufactured by Johnson & Johnson
Sourced in Germany

Durogesic is a transdermal patch containing the active ingredient fentanyl, a potent opioid analgesic. The patch is designed to provide continuous and controlled release of fentanyl through the skin, allowing for long-lasting pain relief.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using durogesic

1

Kidney Wrapping Surgical Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After wound healing, the left kidney was wrapped with silk in a second surgery. Therefore, the animals were anesthetized as described above. Under sterile conditions, the left abdominal cavity was opened. The left kidney was lifted and released from retroperitoneal tissue. Next, the kidney was wrapped with sterilized silk without applying excessive compression to the kidney. Subsequently, the kidney was dropped back into its bed. The peritoneum and all layers above, including the skin, were sutured using Vicryl-suture (Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson, USA). Medication after the surgical intervention was applied as follows: for antibiotic prophylaxis, enrofloxacin (Baytril® 5 mg/kg, Bayer Vital, Germany) was injected subcutaneously the first day and was administered orally (Baytril Flavor, 50 mg/10 kg, Bayer Vital, Germany) for the following 14 days. For analgesia, fentanyl patches (Durogesic®, 25 µg/h mg fentanyl, Janssen-Cilag, Germany) were applied for 3 postsurgical days. In addition, metamizole-sodium (50 mg/kg, Metamizol WDT, Wirtschaftsgenossenschaft deutscher Tierärzte eG, Germany), leveraging its antipyretic and analgesic effects, was administered i.m. on Day 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Telemetry Sensor Implantation in Dogs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For telemetry sensor implantation, animals were anesthetized with thiopental-sodium (Trapanal®, 0.25–0.5 mg/kg, Byk Gulden, Germany) and pancuronium bromide (0.20–0.25 mg/kg Pancuronium Inresa, Inresa Arzneimittel GmbH, Germany). After intubation, all dogs were mechanically ventilated with O2/N2O (1:3). Anesthesia was maintained with 1–2% isoflurane (Isoflurane Baxter, Baxter, Germany). For analgesia, Fentanyl (10–40 µg/kg/h, Mallinckrodt Inc, USA) was infused via the right cephalic vein. After left site thoracotomy, a pressure sensor catheter (Model L21, Data Sciences International, USA) was implanted in the aortic vessel. For ECG measurement, the sensor contains 2 biopotential cables, which are positioned directly on the heart. After implantation, the skin and muscle sections were finally closed by Vicryl-suture (Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson, USA). All animals received enteral antibiotics (Clindamycin (Clerobe®), Zoetis/Germany; 150 mg/animal; p.o.) and Carprofen (Rimadyl®, p.o., 50 mg/animal, Zoetis, Germany) over a period of 10 days after sensor implantation. For additional analgesia, a Durogesic® patch (Fentanyl, 25 µg/h, Janssen-Cilag, Germany) was placed on the right thoracic side. Fourteen days postsurgery, the stitches were then removed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Surgical Procedure for Sheep Analgesia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sheep were allocated individual pens and food was withheld prior to surgery. A fentanyl transdermal patch (Durogesic, Janssen‐Cilag, High Wycombe, UK) was applied 12 h pre‐operatively to provide analgesia. Prior to anaesthesia, xylazine (Rompun, Bayer Healthcare, Newbury, UK) premedication was administered and each sheep was weighed. Following venous cannulation, anaesthesia was induced using intravenous ketamine (Ketaset, Fort Dodge Animal Health, Southampton, UK) and maintained on inhaled isoflurane (Isoflo, Abbott, Maidenhead, UK). The sheep were intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube and physiological parameters were monitored. Intravenous antibiotics (Cefalexin, Ceporex, MSD Animal Health, Hoddesdon, Hertfordshire, UK) and maintenance fluids were administered. The sheep were secured in right lateral recumbency and wool was shaved from the entire limb and hindquarter. The skin was prepared with aqueous iodine scrub solution and draped.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Monkey Brain Surgery Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before the recording sessions, a head bolt and a recording chamber were implanted on the skull of each monkey, under anesthesia and aseptic conditions. Before surgery, anesthesia was induced with 30 mg/kg of ketamine hydrochloride (Ketalar; Parke Davis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). In addition, animals also received 0.15 mg/kg of atropine sulfate (Atropina; Roche, São Paulo, Brazil) to reduce salivation and other secretions and 0.8 mg/kg of benzodiazepine (Valium, Roche) to induce sedation. The animals were intubated with an endotracheal tube, and anesthesia was maintained throughout the procedure with 2% halothane (Fluothane; AstraZeneca, São Paulo, Brazil) in a 7:3 mixture of nitrous oxide and oxygen. We positioned the recording chamber to enable access to area V1, using stereotaxic coordinates and the position of the cortical sulci. Electrocardiogram, body temperature, and end-tidal CO2 were monitored continuously to ensure anesthesia depth and animal wellbeing during surgery. Additionally, we administered postsurgical analgesia for 3 days using a fentanyl skin patch (Durogesic; Janssen-Cilag, São Paulo, Brazil). The animals were monitored for a few days after surgery to ensure their wellbeing and prompt recovery.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transdermal Fentanyl Delivery in Pups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transdermal patches of 12 μg/h Fentanyl® (Durogesic®, Janssen-Cilag, Issy-les-Moulineaux) were used. Size of patches was determined, reporting body weight to expected concentration of fentanyl. Adhesive side was applied to the pup abdomen on the second postnatal day (P2). The patch was left in place for 72 h and was changed every 3 days for 20 days alternating abdominal sides for each subsequent patch application. From P14, skin was shaved prior to application.
Finally, for each application, a transparent adhesive bandage (Opsite®, Smith and Nephew, Le Mans) was applied over the site to maintain the patch and to avoid its oral absorption by pups or mother. Control animals received only the transparent adhesive bandage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fentanyl-Induced Skin Reactions and Allergy Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 52-year-old man with the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer was referred to our department for study. Due to the intense pain caused by generalized bone metastases, he was treated with fentanyl 50mcg/h TTS [Durogesic® [Janssen-Cilag, S.A. Lab], applying them on his back. Initially, the itchy papulovesicular rash was observed on the application site, several days after the beginning of the treatment. Afterward, he developed eczema and superficial desquamation limited to the application site of the TTS (Fig. 1). The patient was intensively affected with bone-ache, so he preferred the skin reaction with fentanyl TTS instead of managing pain without medication. Later on, he tolerated oral morphine or tramadol.
After obtaining informed consent from the patient, an allergy workout was performed: Patch Tests [PT] were applied on his forearm with fentanyl at a concentration of 10% in aqua [aq]. In order to know cross-reactivity among other topical opioids, we also tested PT with buprenorphine 10% aq [Nonweven Patch Test Strips Curatest®; Lohman & Rauscher International, Rangsdorf, Germany].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!