The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Maxwell 16 lev plant rna kit

Manufactured by Promega
Sourced in United States

The Maxwell 16 LEV Plant RNA Kit is a laboratory equipment product designed for the purification of high-quality RNA from plant samples. It utilizes automated magnetic bead-based technology to efficiently extract and purify RNA from a variety of plant materials.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

33 protocols using maxwell 16 lev plant rna kit

1

RNA Extraction from Rice and Arabidopsis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two weeks after seeding, the youngest fully expanded leaves of O. sativa were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 °C prior to RNA isolation for RNA-Seq. Frozen samples were homogenized with zirconia beads YTZ-4 (AS-ONE, Osaka, Japan) using TissueLyser II (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and total RNA was extracted using the Maxwell 16 LEV Plant RNA Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and the Maxwell 16 Automated Purification System (Promega). The concentration of RNA was measured using a QuantiFluor RNA System (Promega) and Quantus Fluorometer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).
Seven days after seeding, bulked seedlings of A. thaliana were homogenized with zirconia beads YTZ-4 using a TissueLyser II (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and total RNA was extracted using the Maxwell 16 LEV Plant RNA Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and the Maxwell 16 Automated Purification System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The RNA concentration was measured using a Quantus Fluorometer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Gene Expression in Plant Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from plant tissue, using the Maxwell 16 LEV Plant RNA Kit (Promega). RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop (Thermo Scientific). cDNA was synthetized using the kit NZY First‐Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (nzytech). SybrGreen real‐time quantitative PCR experiments were performed with a 1:20 dilution of cDNA using a CFC384 Real‐Time System (Bio‐Rad). Data were analyzed with the comparative 2ΔΔCt method using the geometric mean of Ef1α and PP2A as housekeeping genes. See Table [Link], [Link] for qPCR primers used in this work.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA Extraction and miR399 OE Transcriptome

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using the Maxwell 16 LEV Plant RNA Kit (Promega). Libraries were prepared from leaves of 3‐week‐old wild‐type and miR399 OE plants. Each biological replicate consisted of leaves from 15 plants. Two independent miR399 OE lines and three biological replicates for each genotype were examined (see Methods S1 for details on RNA‐Seq analysis). The RNA sequence data were deposited at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO repository (accession number http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE137735).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RT-qPCR Validation of RNA-Seq Differentially Expressed Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genes differentially expressed across different time points were selected to evaluate their expression levels through RT-qPCR for validation of RNA-Seq results. The validation was performed on biological replicates collected 24h after treatment with 2 l ha-1 ANE in the three phenological stages. Primers were designed using the Primer-BLAST tool on NCBI (Ye et al., 2012 (link)). The list of primers is shown in Supplementary Table 2. A quantity of 3 µg total RNA extracted with a Maxwell® 16 LEV Plant RNA Kit (Promega Corporation, USA) was converted into cDNA using a GoScript Reverse Transcription Mix, Random Primer (Promega Corporation, USA). The RT-qPCR assay was performed using a reaction mix composed of 5 μl of GoTaq qPCR Master Mix (Promega Corporation, USA), 1 μl of cDNA (4 ng μl-1), and 0.25 μl of each gene-specific primer in a final volume of 10 μl. Three biological and two technical replicates were performed for each gene. The average Ct values of two internal reference control genes EFI1 (Solyc06g005060.2; Forward: 5’-CTGTGAGGGACATGAGGCAG-3’, reverse: 5’-CTGCACAGTTCACTTCCCCT-3’) and UBI (Solyc07g064130.1; Forward: 5’-GGACGGACGTACTCTAGCTG-3’, reverse: 5’-TCGTCTTACCCGTGAGAGTC-3’) were measured for relative expression analysis using the comparative 2−ΔΔCt method (Schmittgen and Livak, 2008 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cabbage Transcriptome Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using Maxwell 16 LEV Plant RNA kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), subjected to poly‐A isolation, digestion, and complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis, followed by end repair and ligation of a universal adapter. Sequencing was performed to an average depth of 39 M reads, 150‐bp paired end (Illumina HiSeq X; Genewiz, South Plainfield, NJ, USA). Quality of reads was assessed using Fastqc (Andrews, 2010 ) and multiQC (Ewels et al., 2016 (link)). Reads were processed with Trimmomatic (Bolger et al., 2014 (link)) and aligned to the cabbage TO1000 genome (Parkin et al., 2014 (link)), using Star (Dobin et al., 2013 (link)). On average, 92.7% of the reads were aligned to the genome (Supporting Information Table S1). Raw sequencing data is available from the European Nucleotide Archive (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena, study accession no. PRJEB49273).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Transcriptome Analysis of L. starkeyi

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from samples using a Maxwell 16 LEV Plant RNA kit (Promega, Madison, WI) and sequenced on an Illumina platform. Sequences were mapped to the L. starkeyi NRRL-11557 genome [24 (link)] to predict transcription start sites and quantify expression. Clustering analyses were performed in R and expression level of genes quantified with featureCounts [32 (link)] and converted into reads per kilobase million (RPKM) (Additional file 1). Samples belonging to growth, transition, or stationary phase for each bioreactor run were treated as replicates to identify genes significantly differentially expressed in MMPCS versus MMGX using DESeq2 (adjusted p value < 0.01 and log2 fold-change > 1) [33 (link)]. Gene ontology analysis was performed with FunRich [34 (link)]. Metabolic modeling and biochemical pathway visualization utilized Cytoscape3 [35 (link)]. Promoter enrichment analysis was performed using DREME [36 (link)], Tomtom [37 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Nucleic Acid Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted using a cetyl-trimethylammonium-bromide (CTAB) based buffer (Weigel and Glazebrook, 2002).
RNA was extracted using the Maxwell 16 LEV Plant RNA Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. All samples were checked for quality on a 1.5% denaturing agarose gel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Total RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from whole seedlings using the Maxwell 16 LEV Plant RNA Kit (Promega). RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop (Thermo Scientific) and its integrity was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. cDNA was synthetized using the cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche). Real-time quantitative PCR was performed in a total reaction volume of 20 μL using LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master (Roche) and gene-specific primers (S1 Table) on a LightCycler 480 Real-Time PCR System (Roche). The normalized expression of target genes was calculated using UBC as the endogenous reference gene (S1 Table).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation Assay for GLRaV-3 Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GLRaV-3 ORFs 2–7 and 10 were cloned into bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) binary vectors pSPYCE(M), pSPYCE(MR), pSPYNE173, and pSPYNE(R)173 [33 (link)] using primers provided in Table S1 and the same method described for the construction of the Y2H plasmids. To serve as an indicator of the success of infiltration, a red fluorescent protein-expressing plasmid pGPTVII-mCherry was constructed by cloning the mCherry gene from pmCherry (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA) into binary vector pGPTVII using primers and restriction enzymes provided in Table S1. Arabidopsis thaliana protein kinase CIPK24 was used as a negative control in all BiFC assays. Total RNA was extracted from A. thaliana using the Maxwell® 16 LEV Plant RNA Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). From this, the CIPK24 gene was amplified using the primers provided in Table S1, and cloned into each of the four BiFC vectors to obtain pSPYCE(M)::CIPK24, pSPYCE(MR)::CIPK24, pSPYNE173::CIPK24 and pSPYNE(R)173::CIPK24. All vectors were verified by Sanger sequencing. Also used in the BiFC assay was p19, a suppressor of gene silencing encoded by tomato bushy stunt virus cloned into the backbone pCAMBIA1300.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Transcriptional Response of Potato to Nematode Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stem cuttings of potato genotype SH (Bakker et al., 2003 (link)) were grown in vitro and inoculated with infective second‐stage juveniles of G. pallida population D383. Plants were kept at 18°C in the dark and nematode‐infected potato root segments were collected 3 and 6 days after infection (three biological replicates). Samples were collected and snap‐frozen in liquid nitrogen. RNA extraction was performed using the Maxwell 16 LEV‐plant RNA kit (Promega) following the manufacturer's protocol. RNA degradation and contamination were monitored on a 1% agarose gel. Purification was checked by using a NanoPhotometer spectrophotometer (IMPLEN). RNA integrity and quantification were assessed by using the RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit of the Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies). RNA sequencing was done at Novogene by using a Novaseq 5000 PE150 platform, providing at least 50 million clean paired‐end reads of 150 bp per sample. See section 2.2 for data accessibility.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!