The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using isis imaging software

1

Chromosome Copy Number Profiling by DNA-FISH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (DNA-FISH) analysis was performed on paraffin sections using a three-colour probe designed to detect copy-number changes of chromosome 2, 9 and 10. The bacterial artificial chromosome clones used in the probe mix were based on sequencing data (minimal region of gain/loss) and are as follows: 9qC (RP23-248H6, RP23-340D4, RP23-60M16; labelled with Spectrum Red) and 2qC (RP23-332C13, RP23-186P20, RP23-435A5; labelled with Spectrum Green). All RP11 clones were purchased from the Roswell Park Cancer Institute Genomics Shared Resource. Probe labelling, hybridization, post-hybridization washing and fluorescence detection were performed according to procedures established at the Molecular Cytogenetics Core Facility. Slides were scanned using a Zeiss Axioplan 2i epifluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy) equipped with Isis imaging software (MetaSystems). The entire section was first scanned through 63× to assess signal pattern. Corresponding H&E and/or immunostained slides were used to identify regions of premalignant or cancer morphology (foci of adenocarcinoma). Regions selected for analysis were imaged through the depth of the tissue (compressed stack of 12 z-sections at 0.5 μm intervals) and, for each case, within each representative region at least 50 discrete nuclei were scored.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microscopy Imaging and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging was performed using a Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope with ×20, ×63, or ×100 objectives (Plan-NEOFLUAR ×20/0.5, Plan-APOCHROMAT ×63/1.4 Oil, Plan-NEOFLUAR ×100/1.3 Oil) and Meta Systems ISIS imaging software. ImageJ was used to process micrographs, which included cropping of images and minimal adjustment of signal intensity. All images of any experiment were processed in the same way.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

FISH Assays for ROS1 and RET Rearrangements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ROS1 and RET FISH assays were performed on 4-μm-thick sections of FFPE tissue blocks using ZytoLight SPEC ROS1 and RET dual color break-apart probes according to the manufacturer’s instructions (ZytoVision, Bremerhaven, Germany). The design of the probes is depicted in Figure 1: the 5′ orange and 3′ green probes hybridized proximal and distal to the kinase domain, respectively. The slides were analyzed by 2 experienced cytogeneticists (FD and FC) by using a fluorescence microscope (Axioskop2, Axio Imager Z2, Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) and Isis imaging software (Metasystems, Altlussheim, Germany). Per case, at least 100 non-overlapping tumor nuclei were examined. A sample was considered positive for rearrangement if at least 15% of the nuclei showed split signals or isolated 3′ signals. Isolated 5′ signals were thought to result from the deletion of exons encoding the kinase domain and were considered negative. Gene copy number per nucleus was recorded as follows: one copy, two copies, low copy number gain (3 to 6 copies), high copy number gain (7 to 10 copies) and amplification (> 10 copies or innumerable clusters).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Fluorescence Imaging Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images of IF-stained cells were recorded using the ISIS fluorescence image analysis system (MetaSystems, Altlussheim). In some cases, 3D image stacks (step size 0.4 μm) were converted to maximum projection images. Fluorescence profile analysis was done using the measurement option in the ISIS imaging software (MetaSystems).
Confocal laser scanning imaging and collection of focus stacks was performed on a Leica TCS SP5 confocal laser-scanning microscope (kindly provided by H. Leonhard, L-M-U Munich, Germany) equipped with Plan Apo 63x/1.4 NA oil immersion objective (voxel size 50 × 50 × 200 nm), and lasers with the excitation lines 405, 488, 561, 594 and 633 nm. Quantitative image analyses was done in 3D reconstructions from confocal image stacks using ImageJ (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/) or Nemo (Iannuccelli et al. 2010 ) as recommended by the developer (https://www-lgc.toulouse.inra.fr/nemo/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

R-Banded Chromosome Analysis of Complex Karyotypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To obtain R‐banded chromosomes, cells from peripheral blood samples were stimulated with CpG‐oligonucleotides and interleukin‐2 (IL‐2) in culture for 72 hours, using standard techniques.14 All Ks were described according to the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN) 2016. Complex Ks were defined as the presence of three or more numerical or structural chromosomal abnormalities, and highly complex Ks (HCKs) were defined as the presence of five or more abnormalities.15Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on metaphase and interphase nuclei, using the following panel of probes: MYCN (Abbott, Rungis, France), TP53/ATM (Cytocell Ltd, UK), LSI D13S319/12cen (Metasystems, Altlusshein, Germany), and “home‐grown” bacterial artificial chromosome probes for the XPO1 (RP11‐240F4+RP11‐477N2), REL (RP11‐373L24) and BIRC3 (RP11‐177O8) genes were selected using the University of California Santa Cruz Genome Bioinformatic database (NCBI37/hg19 build) and obtained from Genoscope (Evry, France). Results were recorded using a fluorescent microscope (Olympus) with appropriate filters, and Isis imaging software (Metasystems, Heidelberg, Germany). All FISH preparations were scored by two independent assessors, with at least two independent counts of 100 nuclei/probe/assessor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FISH testing was performed on 4-µm sections of FFPE tumor samples. We used Vysis CEP2 (D2Z1) and CEP17 (D17Z1) SpectrumOrange probes (targeting the centromere of chr 2 and chr 17, respectively) and Vysis CEP16 (D16Z3) and LSI 19p13 SpectrumGreen probes (targeting the centromere of chr 16 and the chr 19p13 locus, respectively) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Abbott). Two cytogeneticists (FD, MABR) analyzed the slides using a fluorescence microscope (Axioskop2, Axio Imager Z2, Zeiss) and Isis imaging software (Metasystems). At least 100 non-overlapping tumor nuclei were examined per case.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Chromosome Analysis via Epifluorescence Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromosomes were analyzed by Zeiss Axioplan epifluorescence microscope equipped with a CCD camera and ZEISS Axio Imager.Z2 epifluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Slides were scanned using 10 × objective with Metafer scanning software (MetaSystems, Altlussheim, Germany). Images of metaphase plates were recorded with a CoolCube 1 camera (MetaSystems, Altlussheim, Germany). To analyze gray-scale images, IKAROS and ISIS imaging software (MetaSystems, Altlussheim, Germany) were used. Karyotypes obtained with IKAROS were then adjusted with Krita 5.1.5 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fluorescence in situ Hybridization Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses were performed on chromosome preparations generated from the cell lines using the following conventional techniques: colcemid arrest, hypotonic treatment, and methanol/glacial acetic acid fixation, as described previously [34 (link)]. The following bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones were used: CH82-199H02 and CH82-179B09 for the MDM2 region, CH82-213B06 and CH82-204K11 for the CDK4 region, CH82-99P23 and CH82-60O16 for the CFA 7 region (58.4 Mb to 58.9 Mb), CH82-1E17 and CH82-40I15 for the region containing GABPBP1, and USP8 and TRPM7 amplifications (https://bacpacresources.org/, accessed on 1 July 2021). These BAC clones were labeled using green-dUTP (Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL, USA) and Cy3-dCTP (Amersham Biosciences, Chalfont, UK). The slides were analyzed by an experienced cytogeneticist (FC) using a fluorescence microscope (Axioskop2, Axio Imager Z2, Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) and Isis imaging software (Metasystems, Altlussheim, Germany). At least 100 non-overlapping tumor nuclei were examined in this study.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Fluorescence Microscopy Analysis of FISH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In Rennes, the specimens were analyzed with a fluorescence microscope Axio Imager Z1 (Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) and Isis imaging software (Metasystems, Altlussheim, Germany). The entire hybridized surface was screened using a double band-pass filter with an x63 objective to detect areas with abnormal patterns and to focus the scoring. FISH scoring was performed under both real-time conditions at the microscope and with the use of z-stack images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

FISH Analysis of c-MET in FFPE Tumor Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FISH analyses were performed on the Rennes cohort (n=46). FISH analyses were performed on 4 µm sections of FFPE tumour tissue with the ZytoLight ® SPEC c-MET (7q31, Spectrum Green ® ) / CEN 7 (Spectrum Orange ® ) Dual Color Probe (Zytovision, Bremerhaven, Germany). One cytogeneticist (MABR) independently analysed FISH. The slides were deparaffinized with xylene using a VP2000processor (Abbott, Wiesbaden, Germany). The tissue was digested with pepsin (Dako, Les Ulis, France) for 6 min. The target DNA and probe were codenatured for 10 min at 75 °C using a programmable system (Thermobrite, Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Illinois, USA) and probe hybridization was performed overnight in a humidified atmosphere at 37 °C. The slides were analysed using a fluorescence microscope (BX61, Olympus, Rungis, France) and Isisimaging software (Metasystems, Altlussheim, Germany) [19] (link). The entire hybridized surface was screened using a double bandpass filter with an X63 objective and 50 non-overlapping tumour nuclei were examined. For the c-MET analysis, gain (copy number alteration) was defined by strictly more than 2 c-MET signals and amplification was defined according to UCCC (University of Colorado Cancer Center) scoring system [20] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!