The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Neuroscan synamps2

Manufactured by Compumedics
Sourced in United States, Australia

The Neuroscan Synamps2 is a high-performance, multi-channel electroencephalography (EEG) data acquisition system. It features a modular design and supports up to 272 channels for recording neural activity. The Synamps2 provides precise and reliable data capture for various applications in the field of neuroscience and clinical research.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

36 protocols using neuroscan synamps2

1

EEG Acquisition and Preprocessing for Reward Cue Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EEG data were recorded from 34 scalp electrodes using a 64-channel Quik-Cap (Neuroscan, VA, USA) and a Neuroscan SynAmps2 (link) acquisition system (Neuroscan, VA, USA) at a sampling rate of 500 Hz. Recording electrodes were positioned according to the International 10–20 placement standard with one ground electrode (AFz) and one reference electrode located between Cz and CPz. Impedances were kept below 15 k Ω using Electro-Gel (Electrode-Cap International, OH, USA).
All EEG data were preprocessed offline using custom MATLAB scripts and functions from the open-source EEGLAB (https://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab) toolbox. Continuously recorded EEG signals were first bandpass filtered between 1 and 55 Hz using a two-way finite impulse response (FIR) filter (the ‘eegfilt’ function in EEGLAB) and then were re-referenced to average reference. Stereotypical artefacts, including ocular artefacts (EOG) and muscle tension, were removed using an automatic artefact rejection method40 based on independent component analysis (ICA).41 The EEG data were then segmented into non-overlapping 6 s epochs, each spanning 1 s of rest (i.e. baseline) before the beginning of the trial, 2 s of reward cue and 3 s of squeezing. The segmentation resulted in 45 epochs per participant, with 15 epochs per reward value ($1, $10 or $50).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scalp EEG Acquisition and Preprocessing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The electroencephalography (EEG) data were recorded by a NeuroScan Synamps‐2 that employed Ag/AgCl electrodes placed at 64 standard locations in accordance with the extended international 10–20 system and a precabled electrode cap. The online reference electrode was placed on the left mastoid during recordings and the EEG was rereferenced offline to the right mastoid for data analysis. All the active electrodes were grounded with GND. The horizontal electrooculogram (HEOG) was employed to measure horizontal eye movements, which were recorded using the voltage difference between the electrodes placed lateral to the external canthi. The vertical electrooculogram (VEOG) was used to detect eye blinks, which were recorded using the voltage difference between two electrodes placed above and below the left eye. The EEG signal was filtered online with a bandpass of 0.05–200 Hz and was sampled at 500 Hz. Of note, the impedances were maintained below 20 kΩ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

EEG Preprocessing and Artifact Correction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EEG was acquired with a Neuroscan 128-electrode Quik-Cap and Neuroscan Synamps2 system. The EEG signal was digitized with a 1000 Hz sampling rate, with a low-pass filter of 100 Hz. Impedances were below 5 kΩ. All channels were referenced to the electrode immediately behind channel 63 (Cz). EEG data were visualized and processed using EEGLAB. Malfunctioning electrodes were excluded based upon a combination of visual inspection and automated procedures. Data were rereferenced offline using the average reference, downsampled to 250 Hz, and high-pass filtered using a 0.05 Hz half-amplitude cutoff.
Data processing was performed using MATLAB (MathWorks) with the EEGLAB toolbox (Delorme & Makeig, 2004 (link)). Independent component analysis (ICA) was used to correct for eyeblink artifacts. Single-trial waveforms were screened for amplifier blocking, horizontal eye movements, and any remaining blinks or movement-related artifacts over epochs of 6,000 ms, starting 3,000 ms before the onset of stimulus or response.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Simultaneous ERT and EEG Recordings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ERT was synchronized with EEG recordings. EEG signals were acquired with a 64-channel EEG NeuroScan SynAmps2 sampling at a frequency of 1 KHz. Quick-caps were placed according to the 10–20 system. Impedances were kept below 10 kΩ. Recording sessions were carried out in a Faraday cage of 2x1 m with dimmed light.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multimodal Neurophysiology Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EEG and electromyography activities were recorded from 54 scalp sites using Neuroscan Synamps 2 amplifiers and sintered Ag-AgCl EEG electrodes, positioned within a head-cap in accordance with the 10–20 system (Jasper, 1958 ). Separate electrodes were placed above and below the left eye to monitor vertical electrooculogram activity, and adjacent to the outer canthi of the left and right eyes to monitor horizontal electrooculogram activity to subsequently correct for eye movement. All electrode impedances were kept below 10 kΩ. The raw EEG signal was continuously recorded at a rate of 1000 Hz with an analog bandpass filter of 0.05 to 200 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Resting State and Selective Retrieval EEG Acquisition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants were quietly seated with their eyes closed and the light off during the 5-min resting state EEG recording. On the other hand, to obtain the 5 mins of the task EEG measure, we chose the first 5 mins of the selective retrieval task. The selected recordings corresponded to the first 5 mins of the task during which participants were quietly seated with their eyes open, memorizing the category-word pairs. The EEG was recorded using 64 scalp electrodes that were mounted on an elastic cap using an extended 10–20 system. The continuous activity was recorded using Neuroscan Synamps2 amplifiers (El Paso, TX) and was first recorded using a midline electrode (halfway between Cz and CPz) as reference. Before data analyses, a high-pass filter at 1 Hz was applied and the 5-min recording was segmented into 2-s epochs with 0.5 s of overlap. Artifacts were manually removed by carefully inspecting the data using the Fieldtrip toolbox73 on Matlab (Oostenveld et al., 2011 (link)). Bad channels, with a high level of artifacts (always below 10% of the total for each participant), were visually detected and interpolated from neighboring electrodes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Continuous EEG Recording Methodology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous EEG data were recorded DC-70 Hz with a Neuroscan Synamps 2 digital signal-processing system and Neuroscan 4.3.1 Acquire software. Data were acquired from A2 and 30 scalp sites (Fp1, Fp2, F7, F3, Fz, F4, F8, FT7, FC3, FCz, FC4, FT8, T7, C3, Cz, C4, T8, TP7, CP3, CPz, CP4, TP8, P7, P3, Pz, P4, P8, O1, Oz, O2) with an electrode cap using tin electrodes. A1 was used as a reference and the cap was grounded by an electrode located midway between Fp1, Fp2 and Fz. Display and stimulus markers were controlled by a linked stimulus computer using Neurobehavioral Systems Inc. Presentation V 13.0 Build 01.23.09 software.
EOG was recorded using tin cup electrodes placed 2 cm above and below the left eye for vertical movements, and on the outer canthus of each eye for horizontal movements. Impedance was less than 5 kΩ for cap, EOG, and reference electrodes. Scalp and EOG potentials were amplified with a gain of 500 and digitally sampled at 1000 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Continuous EEG Recording and EOG Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EEG data were recorded continuously DC–70 Hz from A2 and 19 scalp sites (Fp1, Fp2, F7, F3, Fz, F4, F8, T3, C3, Cz, C4, T4, T5, P3, Pz, P4, T6, O1, O2) with an electrode cap using tin electrodes, referenced to A1. The cap was grounded by an electrode located midway between Fp1/Fp2 and Fz. Data were acquired using a Neuroscan Synamps 2 digital signal-processing system and Neuroscan 4.3.1 Acquire software, and the display and stimulus markers were controlled by a linked stimulus computer using Neurobehavioral Systems Inc. Presentation V 13.0 Build 01.23.09 software.
EOG was recorded using tin cup electrodes placed 2 cm above and below the left eye for vertical movements, and on the outer canthus of each eye for horizontal movements. Impedance was less than 5 kΩ for cap, EOG, and reference electrodes. Scalp and EOG potentials were amplified with a gain of 500 and digitized at a rate of 1000 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Scalp EEG Acquisition with Neuroscan System

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous EEG data were recorded DC–70 Hz with a Neuroscan Synamps 2 digital signal-processing system and Neuroscan 4.3.1 Acquire software. Data were acquired from 30 scalp sites (Fp1, Fp2, F7, F3, Fz, F4, F8, FT7, FC3, FCz, FC4, FT8, T7, C3, Cz, C4, T8, TP7, CP3, CPz, CP4, TP8, P7, P3, Pz, P4, P8, O1, Oz, O2) and A2, using an electrode cap with tin electrodes. A1 was used as a reference and the cap was grounded by an electrode located midway between Fp1, Fp2 and Fz. Stimulus presentation was controlled by a linked stimulus computer using Presentation (Neurobehavioral Systems Inc.). The electrooculogram (EOG) was recorded using tin cup electrodes placed on the outer canthus of each eye for horizontal movements, and 2 cm above and below the left eye for vertical movements. Impedance was less than 5 kΩ for all electrodes. Scalp and EOG potentials were amplified with a gain of 500 and digitally sampled at 1000 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

EEG Data Acquisition and Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous EEG data were acquired using a 64-channel electrode cap (EASYCAP GmbH, Herrsching, Germany) with standard 10-10-system electrode placement [67] (link). Electrodes were placed on the outer canthi of both eyes and on the supra-orbit of the right eye to assess horizontal and vertical eye movements; an additional electrode was placed in the middle of the forehead to serve as the ground. Impedances were below 10 kΩ at all sites. ERP recordings were amplified using Neuroscan SynAmps 2 amplifiers (Neuroscan, Inc., North Carolina, USA), with a passband of .1–200 Hz and digitized at 1000 Hz. Recordings were average-referenced offline. Raw epoch data from this study, along with scripts to read the data, can be downloaded from Figshare (http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.829584).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!