The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Quorum k850 critical point dryer

Manufactured by Quorum Technologies
Sourced in United Kingdom

The Quorum K850 Critical Point Dryer is a laboratory instrument used for the drying of samples. It employs the critical point drying method to preserve the structural integrity of delicate specimens during the drying process.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using quorum k850 critical point dryer

1

Seedling Preparation for SEM Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the scanning electron microscopy (SEM), seedlings were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde, 50% ethanol, and 5% acetic acid by vacuum infiltration for 30 min. Seedlings were later kept in the fixative for 8 h, followed by a slow dehydration through a series of ethanol concentrations: 50%, 70% and 90%, 100%, 100%, 60 min each. Seedlings were critical-point dried in liquid CO2 in a Quorum K850 critical-point dryer (Quorum Technologies, East Sussex, UK), and sputter-coated with gold palladium using a Quorum SC7620 mini sputter coater (Quorum Technologies, East Sussex, UK). Images were taken with a JEOL JCM6000 benchtop SEM (Jeol, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples of the scaffolds were fixed with a 2.5% phosphate-buffered glutaraldehyde solution (pH 7.4) for 2 h at 4 °C in the dark, and were then washed with a phosphate-buffered saline. The samples were dehydrated by transfer through ethanol solutions with increasing concentrations of 10, 20, 50, 70, and 96% for 1 h in each concentration, and incubated in acetone for 30 min.
The samples were then exposed to critical point drying (31 °C, 72.8 kg/cm2) by the Quorum K850 Critical Point Dryer (Quorum Technologies, Lewes, UK). The dried samples were coated with a gold layer with a thickness of 10 nm in an argon atmosphere at 20 mA of ion current and 1 mbar of pressure by the Q150R ES rotary-pumped coating system (Quorum Technologies, Lewes, UK). The samples were analyzed using the Tescan Vega3 SBU scanning electron microscope (Tescan, Brno, Czech Republic) with an operating voltage of 15 kV. Imaging was performed by VegaTC software (Tescan, Brno, Czech Republic).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Skin Wounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Skin samples were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 4% formaldehyde in 0.1 M HEPES (pH 7.4) at 4 °C for 24 h. Samples were dehydrated through a graded ethanol series and dried in CO2 using a Quorum K850 Critical Point Dryer (Quorum Technologies Ltd, Laughton, UK) and gold sputter-coated in a gold–palladium alloy with the Quorum SC7620 Mini Sputter Coater/Glow Discharge System. Samples were imaged using an FEI Quanta 250 scanning electron microscope (ThermoFisher Scientific) to visualise the central point of the wound.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Ultrastructural Analysis of Mouse Sperm

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For SEM, fresh sperm isolated from cauda epididymis of mice were washed three times using PBS and then fixed on coverslips with 4% Paraformaldehyde for 2 h. Subsequently, the coverslips carrying spermatozoa were washed with PBS and then dehydrated with gradient ethanol of 50, 60, 70, 80, 95, and 100%. Then, the sperm were dried with Quorum K850 Critical Point Dryer (East Sussex, UK) and coated with gold particles using an ion sputter coater (Rotary Pumped Quorum Technologies, Q150RS). The spermatozoa were finally observed under SEM (Hitachi, S-3400N).
For TEM, testis tissues were isolated from mice and then fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde for more than 24 h. Subsequently, the samples were further fixed with 1% osmic acid for 120 min. After washing with PBS twice, the samples were dehydrated with gradient acetone of 50, 70, 90, and 100% at 4 °C and then embedded in embedding agents containing 6% butylene phthalate, 1% phenol, 44% dodecyl succinic anhydride, and 56% epoxy resin. Next, ultrathin sections (70–90 nm) were obtained and double-stained with lead citrate and uranyl acetate. Finally, the images were taken under transmission electron microscopy (Philips, TECNAI G2 F20) for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Plant Trichomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh leaves from each developmental stage and stems (≈10 each) were rinsed in a 1% sodium hypochlorite solution to clean surfaces, and the abaxial surface of some leaves was stripped with cellophane tape to view the underlying trichomes. Thereafter, leaf and stems were cut into smaller sections (≈3 mm × 4 mm) and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 24 h at 4 °C before being subjected to three phosphate buffer (0.1 M with a 7.2 pH) washes (5 min each). This was followed by post-fixation in 0.5% osmium tetroxide for 4 h at room temperature. Thereafter, the material underwent three phosphate buffer rinses (5 min each) and was then dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, 30%, 50%, 70% (each twice for 5 min), and 100% (twice for 10 min). Following dehydration, samples were dried with a Quorum K850 Critical Point Dryer. Chemically fixed leaf and stem fragments were then mounted onto aluminum stubs which were secured with carbon conductive tape and sputter-coated with gold in a Quorum Q150 RES gold Sputter Coater. Samples were viewed using a Zeiss Leo 1450 SEM (Oberkochen, Germany) at a working distance of 18 mm. Images were captured using the SmartSEM imaging software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!