The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sputter coater em scd500

Manufactured by Leica camera
Sourced in Germany

The Sputter Coater EM SCD500 is a high-performance coating system designed for the preparation of samples for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis. The device coats the sample surface with a thin, uniform layer of conductive material, typically gold or carbon, to enhance the sample's conductivity and improve the quality of SEM images.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using sputter coater em scd500

1

Bacterial Imaging by SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the Electron Microscopy Facility of the RWTH University Hospital, bacteria were fixed with 3% (v/v) glutaraldehyde (Agar Scientific, Wetzlar, Germany) in 0.1 M Soerensen’s phosphate buffer, washed in phosphate buffer for 15 min, and dehydrated by incubating consecutively in an ascending ethanol series (30, 50, 70, 90, and 100%) for 10 min each and the last step thrice. The samples were critical point dried in liquid CO2 (Polaron, GaLa Instrumente, Bad Schwalbach, Germany) and sputter coated (Sputter Coater EM SCD500, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) with a 10-nm gold/palladium layer. Samples were analysed using an environmental scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S-4800, Hitachi, Japan) with a 10-kV acceleration voltage in a high vacuum environment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

SEM Analysis of DKK3-Expressing MDA-MB-436 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To prepare MDA-MB-436 DKK3 and mock clones for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) cells were incubated on glass plates for 72 h under expansion conditions. Afterwards, cells were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde (Agar Scientific, Wetzlar, Germany) for at least 4 h at room temperature, rinsed with 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and dehydrated by incubating consecutively in ascending ethanol series (30, 50, 70 and 90%) with a final incubation in 100% ethanol for 10 min. Last step has been repeated 3 times. Final drying step was performed with hexamethyldisilazane (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) incubation for 10 min. Dried cells were sputter coated with a 10 nm gold palladium layer (sputter coater EM SCD500, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Samples were analyzed using an environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM XL 30 FEG, FEI, Eindhoven, the Netherlands) in a high vacuum environment using acceleration voltage of 10 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SEM Analysis of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After incubation, the samples were washed twice with PBS before fixation with 3% glutaraldehyde solution for at least 24 h. The SEM analysis was conducted by the Electron Microscopy Facility of University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany. The samples were washed for 15 min with 0.1 M Soerensen’s-Phosphate buffer (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Afterward, the samples were incubated stepwise in 30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, and 100% (v/v) ethanol for 10 min each. The last step was repeated three times. The samples were dried in the air. The dried samples were coated with 10 nm gold-palladium in a sputter coater (Sputter Coater EM SCD500, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and investigated with a SE-microscope (ESEM XL 30 FEG, FEI, Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Bacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), bacteria were fixed with 3% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde (Agar Scientific, Wetzlar, Germany) in PBS for at least 4 h, washed in 0.1 M Soerensen’s phosphate buffer (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 15 min, and dehydrated by incubating consecutively in an ascending acetone series (30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, and 100%) for 10 min each and the last step thrice. The samples were critical point dried in liquid CO2 and then sputter coated (Sputter Coater EM SCD500; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) with a 10-nm gold/palladium layer. Samples were analyzed using an environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM XL 30 FEG, FEI, Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) with a 10-kV acceleration voltage in a high-vacuum environment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Bacterial SEM Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For SEM, bacteria were fixed with 3% (v/v) glutaraldehyde (Agar Scientific, Wetzlar, Germany) in PBS for at least 4 h, washed in 0.1 M Soerensen’s phosphate buffer (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 15 min, and dehydrated by incubating consecutively in an ascending acetone series (30, 50, 70, 90, and 100%) for 10 min each and the last step thrice. The samples were critical point dried in liquid CO2 and then sputter coated (Sputter Coater EM SCD500; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) with a 10-nm gold/palladium layer. Samples were analyzed using an environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM XL 30 FEG, FEI, Philips, Eindhoven, Netherlands) with a 10-kV acceleration voltage in a high-vacuum environment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Platinum-coated SEM Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were acquired on a NEON 40 EsB CrossBeam scanning electron microscope (Carl Zeiss NTS GmbH, Germany), operating at 3 keV in the secondary electron and InLens mode. In order to enhance electron density contrast, samples were coated with platinum (3.5 nm) using a Leica EM SCD500 sputter coater.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Whisker Morphology Characterization by SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the whiskers was observed by field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Nova NanoSEM 200, FEI). Imaging of sample microstructure was performed in high-vacuum conditions using an ETD detector at a 10 kV accelerating voltage. Before the study, the samples were covered with conductive material (10 nm gold film) using a Leica EM SCD500 sputter coater. The morphology of the whiskers before and after modification was also observed by a STEM detector installed in SEM. In STEM observations, the whiskers were placed on a copper mesh and observed at 25 kV accelerating voltage. The microstructure of composites was also observed by SEM. Whisker dimensions and composite macropore sizes were determined on the basis of microscopic images using measurement and annotation functions on the sample area. At least 50 measurements were performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Imaging Biofilm Formation on Solid Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The solid surface is imaged before and after each experiment using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). A FEI Quanta 650 FEG scanning electron microscope (SEM) is used for this purpose which is connected to an Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) detector. The images are taken in Concentric BackScatter mode. For the first sample (Bentheimer Sandstone), we only aim to identify whether microbial activities were present during the experiment. As such, the SEM imaging technique following the standard procedure was used, as it allows for identification of the microbial activity by detecting some traces of the formation of biofilm. For the second experiment (pure Quartz sample), however, it was also aimed to study the structure of the fairly intact biofilm. Therefore, the following preservation procedure was carried out immediately after taking the sample out of the captive-bubble cell: (1) Place the sample in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in the fridge at 4 to 7 C overnight to fix the biofilm on the sample, (2) Wash the sample with water twice, (3) Let the sample air dry overnight, and (4) Sputter the sample with gold. For the gold sputtering a Leica EM SCD 500 sputter coater is used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!