The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using site directed mutagenesis kit

1

Examining miR-143-3p Interaction with MCM3AP-AS1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Potential miRNAs interacting with MCM3AP-AS1 were predicted using starBase v2.0 (http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/starbase2/), with miR-143-3p ultimately being selected for further investigation. Next, MCM3AP-AS1 fragments containing the putative miR-143-3p binding sites were produced by Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd. and inserted into the psiCHECK2 vector (Promega Corp.), yielding the wild-type (WT)-MCM3AP-AS1 vector. In addition, a site-directed mutagenesis kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd.) was used to generate a mutated form of this vector termed mutant (MT)-MCM3AP-AS1. These vectors were then used in luciferase reporter assays, wherein cells were grown in 24-well plates and co-transfected with the WT or MT-MCM3AP-AS1 plasmids alongside appropriate miR-143-3p mimics or controls using Lipofectamine 3000. After 48 h, a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay (Promega Corp.) was employed to assess luciferase activity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Mutagenesis of miR-23b-3p Targeting Site

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PE0 (~700 bp) and PE1 (~1000 bp) promoter sequences were amplified from mouse genomic DNA and inserted to pGL3 basic vector (Promega, USA) at the multiple cloning sites, respectively. The E-Tmod 3’-untranslated region (3’UTR) was amplified from mouse cDNA and subcloned to pGL3 control vector at XbaI site. The mutagenesis of potential miR-23b-3p targeting site was introduced by using site-directed mutagenesis kit (Tiangen Biotech., Beijing, China). For transfection, 1 μg of plasmid and 100 ng of renilla luciferase vector were co-transfected into MEL cells by FuGENE 6 (Promega, USA). Cells were collected after 48 hours for the detection of luciferase activity by the dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega, USA). For miRNA study, pGL3 control vector containing wild type or mutated E-Tmod 3’UTR were co-transfected into MEL cells with miR-23b-3p mimics (50 nM) or control mimics. Then the cells were collected after 24 hours for the dual luciferase assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Site-Directed Mutagenesis of Terpene Synthases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The primers for site-directed mutation were listed in Supplementary Table 1. The mutant of AlTPS3-A496G and AvBPPS-G495A were performed using a site-directed mutagenesis kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China). PCR mixture in a volume of 50 μL consisted of 1 U of FastAlteration DNA Polymerase, 5 × FastAlteration Buffer, 10 μM primers, and 50 ng of recombinant plasmid pET-32a -AlTPS3. The PCR mixture was denatured at 95°C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles of 20 s at 94°C, 10 s at 62°C, and 2.5 min at 68°C, and a final 5-min extension at 72°C, the PCR product was incubated at 37°C with DpnI restriction enzyme for 1 h to remove the template plasmid. Then, the PCR product was transformed into competent cells of E. coli, and the mutant site was confirmed by sequencing. The subsequent prokaryotic expression, protein purification were performed following the methods mentioned above. Enzyme assay was performed to compare the products of wild type and mutant using the methods described above with the overnight incubation with GPP instead of 1 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Validating GLP1R 3'-UTR Regulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To create the GLP1R 3′-UTR luciferase reporter plasmid, a pMIR-REPORT vector (Ambion, USA) was used, and nucleotides 262–461 of the GLP1R 3′-UTR were cloned into the plasmid. A similar plasmid with a mutated miR-192 seed sequence (from AGGTCAA to CATGTGC) was also constructed using a site-directed mutagenesis kit (TianGen, China).
HK-2 cells were seeded in a 24-well plate and transfected with a mixture of 1 µg of pMIR-REPORT plasmid, 0.2 µg of β-gal plasmid (Ambion, USA), and 50 nmol miR-192 or negative control (NC) mimic and inhibitor with Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, CA, USA). The cells were lysed 48 h after transfection, and luciferase activity was measured with a luciferase assay kit (Beyotime, China). All experiments were repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cloning and Validating RBP Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genes encoding the RBP and RBP variants were cloned into expression vectors by PCR followed by restriction enzyme digestion and ligation. All RBP variants were obtained using a site-directed mutagenesis kit (TIANGEN). All sequences were confirmed by DNA sequencing. See the SI for experimental details.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

RBD Protein Expression and Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The RBD of S genes (NC_045512.2) was synthesized and cloned into pSecTag2A vector. RBD mutants were constructed using site‐directed mutagenesis kit (TIANGEN). The constructs were transfected into the Expi293 cells using PEI (PolyScience). Four days after transfection, the supernatant was purified by Ni sepharose, then by ion exchange chromatography Source 15Q, Source 15S, and size‐exclusion chromatography Superdex 75 Increase (Cytiva).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Heterologous Protein Expression in E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genes were heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) harboring the plasmid pET28a. The mutants were created using the site-directed mutagenesis kit from Tiangen Biotech. The primer pairs used for site-directed mutagenesis are presented in Supplementary Table S1. E. coli BL21(DE3) was grown in lysogeny broth at 37°C with 200 rpm shaking until the optical density (OD600) of the cultures reached 0.8. The cultures were then cooled to 16°C and isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside was added to a finial concentration of 0.5 mM. The cells were further incubated at 16°C with 200 rpm shaking for 20 h. The cultures were centrifuged at 12 000 g for 10 min at 4°C. The cell pellets were resuspended in 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl). The suspension was subjected to ultrasonication to disrupt the cells. The cell lysate was then centrifuged at 12 000 g for 20 min at 4°C. The supernatants were filtered through a 0.45-μm membrane (Merck Millipore) and then loaded onto AKTA pure (Cytiva, MA, USA) coupled with a HisTrap HP column (5 ml, Cytiva). The product fraction was eluted with imidazole-containing (50–500 mM) elution buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 8.0) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The collected product fractions were further subjected to a desalting column (5 ml, Cytiva) with elution buffer to remove imidazole.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

miRNA Binding Site Validation via Luciferase Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
StarBase2.0 was used to predict the potential binding sites of miRNAs on DSCAM-AS1 [32 (link)]. Generation of Wild-type (WT) DSCAM-AS1 with potential miR-384 binding sites were inserted into a luciferase reporter vector psi-CHECK-2 (Promega, USA). In addition, a site-directed mutagenesis kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) was used to generate a mutated form of this vector termed MT-DSCAM-AS1.Co-transfection of CRC cells with luciferase plasmids and miR-384 mimics or miR-NC were carried out followed by culturing for 48 h. Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) was used to determine the luciferase activities, following the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!