The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Trio 3.0 tesla mri scanner

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in Germany

The Trio 3.0 Tesla MRI scanner is a magnetic resonance imaging system manufactured by Siemens. It operates at a magnetic field strength of 3.0 Tesla, which is a commonly used field strength for advanced medical imaging applications. The Trio 3.0 Tesla MRI scanner is designed to acquire high-quality images of the human body for diagnostic purposes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

18 protocols using trio 3.0 tesla mri scanner

1

Acquisition of Structural and Functional Brain Images

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Functional and structural images were obtained with a 3.0-tesla Trio MRI scanner (Siemens Magnetom Trio, Erlangen, Germany) with a 12-channel head coil. T1-weighted structural images were acquired with the following parameters: echo time (TE)=1.89 ms; repetition time (TR)=1670 ms; field of view (FOV)=250 mm; flip angle=9°; matrix=256×256; voxel size=1.0×0.98×0.98 mm3; and 208 slices. Resting-state fMRI images were acquired with the following parameters: TE=30 ms; TR=3,500 ms; FOV=240 mm; flip angle=90°; matrix=128×128; voxel size=1.9×1.9×3.5 mm3; and 35 slices. During the functional imaging session, subjects were instructed to relax and keep their eyes closed but not to fall asleep. A questionnaire was administered to the participants after the scan to ensure that they had not fallen asleep. We used head cushions and asked subjects to move as little as possible during image acquisition to minimize motion artifacts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

CSF Biomarkers and Brain Imaging in Alzheimer's

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following a fast, baseline CSF samples were collected via lumbar puncture using 24G Sprotte atraumatic spinal needles and sterile polypropylene tubes (Falcon Fisher Scientific UNSPSC Code 41121703), separated into 0.5 cc aliquots, stored at ‐80°C, and shipped for analysis by the Biomarker Research Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania. CSF biomarkers (Aβ42, total tau, and p‐tau181) were measured using the Multiplex xMAP Luminex platform (Luminex Corp, Austin, Texas, USA) with Innogenetics (INNO‐BIA AlzBio3; Ghent, Belgium) immunoassay reagents.
Brain MRI data were collected using a 3.0 Tesla Trio MRI scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, Pennsylvania, USA). High‐resolution, T1‐weighted images, hippocampal volume and other volumetric measurements were collected.39 Left and right hippocampal volumes were obtained and combined to derive the total hippocampal volume. Intra‐cranial volume was derived for adjusted measurements.4 rs‐fMRI data were acquired to assess FC between brain regions.40 See Supplement for details of MRI assessment and pre‐processing (Section 1.3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cortical Thickness Estimation from MPRAGE MRI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T1-weighted 3D MPRAGE images were acquired on a Siemens Trio 3.0 Tesla MRI scanner. At time 1, an 8-channel, receive-only RF head coil was used (TI=1100ms, TR=1800ms, TE=2.93ms, flip angle=12°, FOV=256mm, slice thickness=1.0mm, 160 slices) and at time points 2 and 3, a 12-channel, receive only RF head coil was used (TI=900ms, TR=2200ms, TE=2.91ms, flip angle=9°, FOV=256mm, slice thickness=1.2mm, 160 slices). Imaging hardware and protocol changes from time point 1 to 2 and 3 were modeled in the statistical analysis. Extraction of cortical thickness estimates are described in detail in Zielinski et al., 2014 (link). Briefly, Freesurfer image analysis suite v5.1.0 (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu) was used for cortical parcellation and thickness estimations using the Desikan-Killiany Atlas (Desikan et al. 2006 (link)), resulting in average cortical thickness in 34 cortical parcels per hemisphere.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Resting-state fMRI of Brain Connectivity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MR images were acquired with a Siemens Trio 3.0 Tesla MRI scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) at the Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University. All patients were asked to discontinue their pain medications 1–3 days before fMRI. Before fMRI, the participant’s head was stabilized using foam pads to minimize both head movement and scanner noise. Resting-state fMRI of the whole brain was performed using an echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence: axial slice: 33, slice thickness: 4 mm, no gap, matrix: 64 × 64, repetition time: 2,000 ms, echo time: 30 ms, flip angle = 90°, and field of view: 192 mm × 192 mm. During the fMRI scanning, all subjects were instructed to keep their eyes closed, relax, and movements as little as possible without thinking about anything in particular. Each scan lasted for 8 minutes and 6 seconds, but the first six seconds would comprise of dummy scanning. Thus, a total of 240 image volumes were collected. Additionally, T1-weighted sagittal images covering the entire brain were obtained with a magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo sequence: slices per slab: 192, slice thickness: 0.9 mm, gap: 0.45 mm, repetition time: 2530 ms, echo time: 2.4 ms, inversion time: 1100 ms, field of view: 256 mm × 256 mm, flip angle: 7°, and matrix: 256 × 256.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Resting-State fMRI Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were acquired using a Siemens Trio 3.0 Tesla MRI scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) at the Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University. We used foam pads to fix the head of each participant to reduce both head movements and scanner noise. Resting-state functional images were acquired using an echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence (30 transverse slices, slice thickness/gap = 4 mm/0.8 mm, matrix = 64×64, repetition time = 2000 ms, echo time = 30 ms, flip angle = 90°, field of view = 220 mm×220 mm). Structural images of T1-weighted anatomical images in a sagittal orientation were obtained using magnetization prepared by rapid gradient echo sequence (MPRAGE) (192 slices covered the whole brain, slice thickness/gap = 1 mm/0.5 mm, repetition time = 1900 ms, echo time = 3.42 ms, field of view = 240 mm×240 mm, matrix = 256×256). To identify the location of the lesion, T2-weighted images were collected using a turbo-spin-echo sequence (30 axial slices, thickness = 5 mm, no gap, repetition time = 6000 ms, echo time = 93 ms, field of view = 220 mm×220 mm, matrix = 320×320). During the resting-state functional MRI collection, the participants were instructed to close their eyes but to remain awake while trying not to think about anything specific. We collected a total of 240 image volumes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

High-Resolution Whole-Brain fMRI Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All imaging data was acquired at the Caltech Brain Imaging Center using a Siemens Trio 3.0 Tesla MRI scanner outfitted with a 32 channel phased-array head coil. We acquired 1330 whole-brain T2*-weighted echoplanar image volumes (EPIs; multi-band acceleration factor = 4, slice thickness = 2.5 mm, in-plane resolution = 2.5 × 2.5 mm, 56 slices, TR = 1000 ms, TE = 30 ms, flip angle = 60°, FOV = 200 mm) for the two experimental tasks. Participants’ in-scan head motion was minimal (max translation = 2.78 mm, max rotation = 1.88°). We also acquired an additional 904 EPI volumes for each participant for use in a separate study. Finally, we acquired a high-resolution anatomical T1-weighted image (1 mm isotropic) and field maps used to estimate and correct for inhomogeneity-induced image distortion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Stress Task fMRI Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging data were acquired using a Siemens Trio 3.0 Tesla MRI scanner at the UCLA Staglin Center for Cognitive Neuroscience. First, we acquired a T1-weighted MPRAGE anatomical image for functional image registration and normalization (slice thickness = 1 mm, 176 slices, TR = 2300 ms, TE = 2.98 ms, flip angle = 9 degrees, matrix = 256 × 256, FOV = 256 mm). Then, we acquired 288 functional T2-weighted EPI volumes, during the stress task (slice thickness = 3 mm, gap = 1 mm, TR = 2000 ms, TE = 25 ms, flip angle = 90 degrees, matrix = 64 × 64, FOV = 200 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Functional Neuroimaging with 3T MRI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All images were acquired using a Siemens Trio 3.0 Tesla MRI scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Tight but comfortable foam padding was used to minimize head motion, and earplugs were used to reduce scanner noise. Functional MR images were collected using an echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence with the following scan parameters: repetition time (TR)/echo time (TE) = 2000/30 ms; field of view (FOV) = 220 mm×220 mm; matrix = 64×64; flip angle (FA) = 90°; slice thickness = 3 mm; gap = 1 mm; 32 interleaved transversal slices; and 180 volumes. During the fMRI scans, all subjects were instructed to keep their eyes closed, stay as motionless as possible, think of nothing in particular, and not fall asleep. Structural images were obtained in the sagittal orientation by employing a magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo sequence over the whole brain: 176 slices, thickness/gap = 1.0/0 mm, matrix = 256×224, TR = 1600 ms, TE = 2.6 ms, FA = 9°, and FOV = 256 mm×224 mm. T2-weighted images were acquired using a turbo-spin-echo sequence: 20 axial slices, thickness/gap = 5.0/6.5 mm, matrix = 512×416, TR = 4140 ms, TE = 92 ms, and FOV = 187 mm×230 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Structural and Resting-State fMRI Acquisition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were obtained using a Siemens Trio 3.0 Tesla MRI scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with a standard 12-channel head coil. Restraining foam pads was used to reduce head motion and earplugs were used to reduce scanner noise. High-resolution T1-weighted anatomical images (repetition time (TR) = 1900 ms, echo time (TE) = 2.46 ms, flip angle = 9 degrees, 32 transverse slices, field of view (FOV) = 240 × 240 mm, matrix = 256 × 256, slice thickness = 1 mm) were acquired using a magnetization prepared rapid gradient-echo sequence. Resting-state functional MRI data were acquired using a single-shot, gradient-recalled echo planar imaging sequence (TR = 2000 ms, TE = 25 ms, flip angle = 90 degrees). 32 transverse slices (FOV = 240 × 240 mm, matrix = 64 × 64, slice thickness = 5 mm) resulting in a total of 80/157 volumes and a scan time of 164/314 s, respectively, in eyes-open and eyes-closed rs-fMRI. During the scan, participants were instructed to stay aware. After the scan, the technicians would check the quality of structural images. If any abnormalities were found in the images, participants were re-scanned.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multimodal MRI Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following MRI scans were performed on a Trio 3.0 Tesla MRI scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany): 1) rs-fMRI with repetition time (TR)/echo time (TE) = 2000/30 ms, field of view (FOV) = 200 × 200 mm2, matrix = 64 × 64, 30 interleaved axial slices with thickness = 4 mm and inter-slice gap = 1.2 mm. 240 time points were acquired; 2) High resolution anatomical scan using a three dimensional magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequence with the following parameters: TR/TE = 1900/2.26 ms; matrix = 240 × 256 × 176; FOV = 215 × 230 × 176 mm3; 3) Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) with TR/TE = 7200/104 ms; matrix = 128 × 128; FOV = 230 × 230 mm2; 49 axial slices (thickness = 2.5 mm); 64 nonlinear gradient directions (b = 0, 1000 s/mm2); 4) Two dimensional structural MRI with a T2-weighted sequence with TR/TE = 5100/117 ms; matrix = 416×416; FOV = 240×240 mm2; number of excitations = 3; 22 axial slice with a thickness of 6.5 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!