The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pm100usb

Manufactured by Thorlabs
Sourced in United States

The PM100USB is a compact, handheld optical power meter designed for precise and reliable power measurements. It features a USB interface for easy connection to a computer and is compatible with a wide range of Thorlabs' photodetectors.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using pm100usb

1

Photoconversion for Rheology Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The photoconversion for rheology measurements was performed with the same LED lamp (M405L3c, THORLABS, USA) as the spectral experiments. Light intensity was 468.6 mW·cm−2 in all experiments as measured by an optical power meter (PM100USB, THORLABS, Gemany) with thermal power sensor (S405C, THORLABS, Gemany). The rheological properties of PhoCl-PEG hydrogels measurements were carried out using a HAAKE RheoStress 6000 (Thermo Scientific) at 25°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Colon Stimulation via Blue Light

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Segments of the transplanted colon were dissected and prepared as above. Blue light stimulation (BLS) was applied from a diode-pumped solid-state laser system (470 nm, 200 mW, Model number: MDL-III-470; OptoEngine, LLC, Midvale, UT). Trains of light pulses (20 ms pulse width, 20 mW/mm2 light intensity, 10 Hz, 30 s train duration) were focally directed on the serosal surface of the transplanted colon in the organ bath via a glass fiberoptic (200 µm diameter). Light intensity was assessed using Power and Energy Metre Interface (PM100USB, Thorlabs) and Standard Photodiode Power Sensor (S121C, Thorlabs).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bilateral Optogenetic Stimulation of Retrosplenial Cortex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For bilateral stimulation, mice were anesthetized with an oxygen/isoflurane mix and the skull was thinned to create a 1mm2 translucent window above retrosplenial cortex (anterioposterior −1.58mm; mediolateral: ±0.5mm at window center), extending 0.5mm into each hemisphere from the mid-sagittal suture). Area of light penetration was limited by surrounding entire skull surface except for thinned skull window with a layer of opaque black lacquer. Water/heat-proof silicon-encased SMD 5050 tri-chip ultra-bright LEDs (oznium.com) were purchased pre-wired with resistors and affixed with clear superglue over skull window. Light intensity at brain surface ranged from 3.5 to 4.1 mWmm−2 (mean=3.8mWmm−2), obtained by pulsing light at 5Hz through a 1mm2 thinned skull window (removed post-mortem from an experimental animal) and placed over a light sensor (ThorLabs, S302C) connected to a power meter (ThorLabs, PM100USB). Estimated light spread is ≤250uM from surface, based on previously published estimates (Huber et al., 2008 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Optogenetic Stimulation Setup for Behavioral Studies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The optical fiber was connected using a pigtail rotary joint (Thorlabs) to a 470 nm laser (Ikecool, Anaheim, CA, USA) or a 589 nm laser (Laserglow, ON, Canada) driven by a Grass S88X that generated the stimulation trains (10 s train, 10 ms pulses, 20 Hz; Caggiano et al., 2018 (link); Josset et al., 2018 (link)). To visualize optogenetic stimulation, a small (diameter 0.5 cm), low-power (0.13 W) red LED that received a copy of the stimulation trains was placed in the field of view of the camera placed above the open field. The 470 nm light source was adjusted to 6–27% of laser power and the 589 nm to 40–53% of laser power. The corresponding power measured at the fiber tip with a power meter (PM100USB, Thorlabs) was 0.1–16.0 mW for the 470 nm laser and 1.7–9.4 mW for the 589 nm laser.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterizing Curing Lamp Intensity Profile

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The curing lamp used in this study is X-Lite-II, which has a broad emission wavelength of 385–515 nm with a manufacturer specified intensity of 1700 mW/cm2. The lamp head diameter was 8 mm and was placed on a linear translation stage. To measure the intensity profile of the lamp, a power meter based setup is used as shown in Fig. 1. The sensor used was S142C (Thorlabs) which has a measurement range of (300–700 nm) connected to a power energy meter PM100USB (Thorlabs). To measure the lamp profile, a pin-holed mount was placed on the power meter sensor (where pin hole is in the middle of the sensor) and was scanned edge to edge of the lamp head.

Experimental setup to measure the intensity profile of the curing lamp.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Photoalignment Layer Writing Apparatus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The optical setup for writing the aligning direction on photoalignment layers comprises a UV light‐emitting diode (365 nm), an SLM (SM7‐405, Sicube Photonics Co., Ltd.), and a motorized rotational stage (K10CR1/M, Thorlabs) furnished with a UV polarizer (LPUV‐100‐MP2, Thorlabs). The SLM is a digital micromirror device that has a wide extended graphics array (WXGA, 1280 × 800 pixels). The polarizer works synchronously with the SLM. Target substrates were mounted on a three‐axis translation stage (DT12XYZ, Thorlabs) to align with the optical setup. A rail (RLA600/M, Thorlabs) and rail carriers (RC4, Thorlabs) were used to adjust the distance between substrates and the optical setup. The intensity of UV light at substrates was controlled to be 2.2 mW cm–2. It was measured using a power meter (PM100USB, Thorlabs). The maximum dispersion of the light intensity across the center to the boundary was controlled to be below 7%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Microscopy Imaging of NAD(P)H and Fluorescent Dye

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All microscopy was performed with a Nikon Ti-E inverted microscope, operated using NIS-Elements. Light sources for bright field and fluorescence imaging were a halogen lamp and an LED (pE-2, CoolLED), respectively. 365 nm-light was for excitation in NAD(P)H-channel with a filter set comprising a 350/50-nm band-pass filter, a 409-nm beam-splitter and a 435/40-nm emission filter while 470 nm-light was for the fluorescence dye with a filter set comprising a 470/40-nm band-pass filter, a 495-nm beam-splitter and a 525/50-nm emission filter. A wavelength-optimized 100x objective (MRF02900, Nikon) and camera (DU-897 EX, Andor) were used for image acquisition. The EM Gain Multiplier of the camera was disabled and the Readout Mode was set to 1 MHz to reduce the camera readout noise. The baseline level of camera was set to 500 at −75 °C to avoid negative intensity value. Exposure energies were determined as exposure time (set in NIS elements) multiplied by exposure power, which was measured with a power meter (PM100USB, Thorlabs) and a power sensor (S120VC, Thorlabs), located at the specimen plane. The Nikon Perfect Focus System was used in all time-lapse movies to ensure focusing. Images in bright field channel were focused 1.05 μm higher than that in the fluorescence channels to facilitate cell segmentation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of Pulsed LED Sources

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The current pulse provided to LED sources was measured through the integrated output of the DLD, whereas the emitted optical pulses were characterized using a Si-based photodiode (DET36A, Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA; rise/fall time: 14 ns). All data were recorded by the digital oscilloscope of the PA system (NI USB-5133). The emission spectra of LEDs were determined by a spectrograph (getSpec 2048, getAmo, Sofia, Bulgaria) using 1 nm wavelength steps. The average power of the LEDs during the pulsed operation was measured using a sensitive thermal power sensor head (S405C, Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA) connected to a USB power meter interface (PM100USB, Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA). For each measurement, the sensor head was placed at the bottom of an empty sample container, with its front side facing directly the 10 mm diameter circular window. In every case, the LED was positioned at a fixed distance below the surface of the coverslip glass. The two LED sources operated one at a time, and were placed at identical positions to achieve similar illumination conditions on the phantoms. The optical power on the sample was controlled using a set of neutral density filters (NDK01, Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA). Absorption spectra of phantom samples were measured by a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (BK-D590, Biobase, Jinan, China) using 1 cm path plastic cuvettes and a wavelength step of 1 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Steady-State Singlet Oxygen Emission Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The steady-state singlet oxygen emission measurements were performed
on a previously reported custom-built setup utilizing a slightly modified
experimental procedure.59 (link)−61 (link) Perinaphthenone was used as a
reference with reported φΔ(1O2) = 0.98 ± 0.07 in air-saturated ACN and φΔ(1O2) = 0.97 ± 0.04 in air-saturated
CD3OD.48 (link),62 (link) Ru(bpy)3Cl2 was used as a validation compound with reported φΔ(1O2) = 0.57 ± 0.06 in air-saturated ACN
and φΔ(1O2) = 0.73 ±
0.12 in air-saturated CD3OD.49 (link),63 (link) All the compounds
were dissolved in ACN or CD3OD (V = 3
mL) and transferred into a macro fluorescence cuvette from Firefly
(lightpaths: 1 cm × 1 cm). The irradiation of samples was done
at 298 K using a 450 nm LRD-0450 Laserglow fiber-coupled laser set
to 80 mW at the cuvette with help of a PM100USB Thorlabs power meter.
The UV–vis and NIR spectra were recorded at 298 K with Agilent
Cary 60 UV–vis and Avantes NIR256–1.7TEC spectrometers,
respectively. The NIR emission spectra were acquired within 20 s.
All the spectral data were processed with OriginPro 9.1 and Microsoft
Office Excel 2016.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

PEC Characterization of LaFeO3 Photocathode

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PEC measurements were carried out in a three-electrode cell using an electrochemical workstation (CHI660E) with bare LFO or Au/LFO as a working electrode, Pt foil as a counter electrode, and Ag/AgCl as a reference electrode. The PEC performance of LaFeO3 photocathode was measured in 0.1 M Na2SO4 aqueous solution at PH 7, under light illumination using a 350 W Xe lamp. The light power intensity at the sample positions was calibrated with a radiometer (PM100USB, Thorlabs) to simulate AM 1.5 illumination. The incident photon to current conversion efficiency (IPCE) was measured with a 350 W Xe lamp and a monochromator (Omni-λ150) whose intensity was obtained by a power meter (Newport). The amperometric Jt photoresponse was investigated under a bias voltage of 0.6 V (vs. RHE) with chopped illumination interval of 10 s. Impedance measurements were carried out in the dark with a scan rate of 5 mV s−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!