The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Prism version 8

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

Prism Version 8.0 is a multi-functional lab equipment designed for scientific research and analysis. It provides advanced data processing and visualization capabilities. The core function of Prism Version 8.0 is to enable researchers to analyze and interpret complex data sets efficiently and effectively.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using prism version 8

1

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were analysed with GraphPad Prism Version 8.0 software or SPSS 20.0 software. Depending on the data, Student’s t test, ROC curve, one-way ANOVA, LSD, chi-square test, or Fisher’s exact probability test was used for comparing differences, and p < 0.05 was considered to be significant. Statistical tests and p values of each experiment are shown in the legends of the figures.
Further details of materials and methods are provided in the Supplementary materials and methods.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism Version 8.0 software and SPSS 20.0. The numerical results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical differences were evaluated by one-way ANOVA analysis of variance, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test on dependent experimental designs. p value < 0.05 is considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

FBXO43 Expression Analysis in Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GraphPad Prism Version 8.0 (CA, USA) and SPSS 25 Software (SPSS Inc., USA) were used to analyze the trial data. The Pearson χ2 test was used to evaluate the relationship between the FBXO43 expression level and clinicopathological features. Linear regression was used to analyze the association between the two continuous variables. Cox regression analysis was used for univariate and multivariate analyses. The Kaplan-Meier method was performed for survival analysis. The t-test was used to compare the differences between the two groups, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used when more than two groups were compared. All measurement data were expressed as the mean ± SEM. p< 0.05 indicated statistical significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Survival Analysis of Patient Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient date of death (DOD), date of last follow-up, and time to progression were used to generate Kaplan-Meier plots of OS and PFS followed by log-rank tests. For OS analyses, DOD was used as a primary end point. Patients still alive were censored at the time of last follow-up. Time of progression was used as the primary end point for PFS analyses, and DOD was used as the secondary end point for patients without a progression date. Statistical analyses including pairwise comparisons and Cox proportional hazard models were done using Prism version 8 and SPSS statistical software version 27 (IBM Corp). Hazard ratios were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method and reported with a 95% CI and a significance cut-off of P < .05. All tests were 2-tailed. Royston D statistics were calculated for each prognostic model. Follow-up duration was determined using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method. All analyses were conducted with SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analyzing Biomarkers and Disease Severity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IBM SPSS version 25.0 (Chicago, IL, USA) and Prism version 8 (San Diego, CA, USA) were used for data analysis. Descriptive summary measures including frequency, percentages, mean with standard deviation (SD) and median with interquartile range (IQR) were used to describe basic features of the study data. Chi-square test was used to determine associations between categorical variables. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine normality. A Bonferroni-adjusted Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare biomarker concentrations by group. Binary logistic regression was used to identify predictors of disease severity. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was employed to set cutoff points to predict disease status and disease severity, and the Spearman rank correlation was done to see the correlation between inflammatory mediators. P-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!