The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using avibactam

1

Identifying BL Resistance Mechanisms in CPO Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial isolates of human CPO infection were acquired from the CDC and FDA Antibiotic Resistance Isolate Bank. The BL resistance mechanisms, including the β-lactamase production, were identified by analyzing the whole genome sequence of the isolates with the Resistance Gene Identifier of the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (McArthur et al., 2013 (link); Alcock et al., 2020 (link)). The information of the genome sequences (i.e., sequence accession numbers) of the tested isolates was provided by the CDC and FDA Antibiotic Resistance Isolate Bank, and is available on the official website of this isolate bank. Three BLIs (clavulanate, vaborbactam, avibactam) and their clinically combined partner BLs (amoxicillin for clavulanate; meropenem for vaborbactam; ceftazidime for avibactam) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. To facilitate comparison, all BLIs were tested at the same concentration attainable in patient plasma (50μm) (Carlier et al., 2013 (link); Nicolau et al., 2015 (link); Lee et al., 2019 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluation of β-Lactam Combinations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Piperacillin was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Tazobactam was purchased from Chem-Impex International (Wood Dale, IL). Relebactam and avibactam were obtained from Merck (Whitehouse Station, NJ) and Allergan (Bridgewater, NJ), respectively. Stock solutions were prepared in sterile water and stored at −80°C before use. Two CTX-M-15 producing K. pneumoniae (Kp3 and KpK91) and an SHV-12-producing E. coli (EcF65) obtained from a reference microbiology laboratory (Madrid, Spain) were used along with a locally sourced K. pneumoniae harbouring CTX-M-15 (Kp2301). These isolates were previously confirmed to display the ESBL phenotype and showed different susceptibilities to Tazobactam inhibition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic susceptibility testing protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zidebactam, ertapenem, ceftolozane and avibactam were from Wockhardt (Aurangabad, India); other antibiotics were from Alpha Aesar (Heysham, UK) or Merck KGaA (Gillingham, UK). MICs were determined by BSAC agar dilution on IsoSensitest agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) 13 and interpreted versus current (v.10.0) EUCAST guidance. 14 Certificates of Analysis data were provided for each antibiotic, irrespective of source, and were used to derive potencies (as per CLSI guidance), with appropriate correction factors then used when preparing antibiotic dilutions. Cefepime/zidebactam was tested as a 1:1 ratio; tazobactam was used at a fixed 4 mg/L in combinations with ceftolozane and piperacillin; avibactam at a fixed 4 mg/L combined with ceftazidime. Across 33 sets of MIC testing plates for eight antibiotics there were just nine instances where values for one of the four control strains (Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and ATCC 35218, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603) fell outside the accepted control limits.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Stock Solution Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, doripenem, ceftazidime–avibactam, aztreonam, and Ca-EDTA (Sigma‒Aldrich) were used to prepare stock solutions <24 h before use. All agents were dissolved in cation-adjusted Müller–Hinton II broth (MHIIB) (Sigma‒Aldrich), and the solutions were sterilized through a syringe filter with a membrane nominal pore size of 0.22 μm. Serial dilutions of the antibiotic and Ca-EDTA stocks were prepared in MHIIB immediately before use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluation of Inhibitor Quality

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The inhibitors
sulbactam, avibactam, and clavulanic acid were purchased
from Sigma-Aldrich, MedChemExpress, and Matrix Scientific, respectively.
It was found that quality can vary between suppliers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluation of Imipenem, Faropenem, and Avibactam Against M. abscessus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The M. abscessus reference strain ATCC 19977 (ATCC, Manassas, VA) as well as 20 deidentified clinical strains obtained from patients at the Johns Hopkins Hospital15 (link),16 (link) were used for this study. The clinical isolates have been identified to the sub-species level26 (link) and the MICs of many other β-lactams against these strains have been published15 (link),21 (link). The strains were grown in Middlebrook 7H9 broth (Difco) supplemented with 0.5% glycerol, 10% albumin-dextrose-NaCl enrichment, and 0.05% Tween-80, at 37 °C with constant shaking at 220 RPM in an orbital shaker. Imipenem, faropenem, and avibactam were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!