The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Proteome discoverer software

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Denmark

Proteome Discoverer software is a data analysis platform designed for processing and interpreting mass spectrometry data. It provides a comprehensive suite of tools for protein identification, quantification, and post-translational modification analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

273 protocols using proteome discoverer software

1

Identifying TTBK2-mediated KIF2A Phosphorylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To identify the TTBK2-mediated phosphorylation sites on KIF2A, purified GST–KIF2A-N was subjected to a nonradioactive phosphorylation assay using TTBK2 and then precipitated using glutathione beads. The precipitated samples were eluted with guanidine solution (50-mM NH4HCO3 and 7-M guanidine-HCl). The eluates were subjected to reduction, alkylation, demineralization, and peptide enrichment, followed by digestion using trypsin. The phosphopeptides were enriched using the Titansphere Phos-TiO kit (GL Sciences) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Nanoelectrospray tandem mass spectrometry analysis was performed using a mass spectrometry system (Q Exactive; Thermo Fisher Scientific) combined with an ultra HPLC system (Nano-Advance; Bruker-Michrom, Inc.). The raw data were analyzed using Proteome Discoverer software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with the Sequest algorithm at a precursor mass accuracy of 15 ppm and a tandem mass spectrometry tolerance of 0.02 D. The peptide search was performed against the UniProtKB Homo sapiens reference proteome dataset (release 2012_10) using a 1% false discovery rate threshold. The most likely phosphorylation site was determined using the PhosphoRS algorithm within the Proteome Discoverer software (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Peptide Identification from Sheep Proteomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptide identification from raw data was carried out using the MASCOT engine (Matrix Science, London, UK; version 2.2) and Proteome Discoverer software (Thermo Electron, San Jose, CA; version 1.4). The MS/MS spectra were searched against the UniProt sheep database (27,563 sequences, downloaded on 20/11/2021). The method for protein identification was referred as described previously (25 (link)). The following options were used: Peptide mass tolerance = 20 ppm, MS/MS tolerance = 0.1 Da, Enzyme = Trypsin, Missed cleavage = 2, Fixed modification: Carbamidomethyl (C), iTRAQ 8 plex (K), iTRAQ 8 plex (N-term), Variable modification: Oxidation (M) (25 (link)). Peptides were identified at a false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 0.01. Differentially abundant proteins were determined using a Student's t-test. Proteins with P < 0.05 and a fold change ≥ 1.2 were considered upregulated, and a fold change ≤ 0.83 was considered to be downregulated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Aurora-B Kinase Assay and Phosphorylation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Kinase assays were performed incubating 150 ng of GST-Aurora-B in kinase buffer (Hepes 20 mM pH 7.5, 1 mM DTT, 10 mM MgCl2 and 1 mM EGTA) in the presence of γ-32P-ATP (Perlkin-Elmer, BLU502Z250UC) at 30 °C for 30 min. MBP, His-H2B, or GST-HIPK2-K228R were used as substrates. GST-HIPK2-K228R alone was used to evaluate the autophosphorylation level of the defective mutant. Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and phosphorylation analyzed by autoradiography.
Cold kinase assays were performed with 2 μM ATP (Roche) for 1 h and phosphorylated H2B analyzed by WB or MS. For MS, H2B was in-gel digested with trypsin, chymotrypsin, AspN or GluC and peptides analyzed by liquid chromatography MS using an Ultimate 3000 HPLC (DIONEX) connected on line with a linear Ion Trap (LTQ, Thermo). MS/MS and MS/MS/MS were acquired in order to search for phosphopeptides carrying mass increase and neutral losses, respectively. Tandem mass spectra were analyzed by Proteome Discoverer software (version 1.4, Thermo Electron) searching.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Decellularized Lung Proteome Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Native and decellularized lung tissue, three samples per lung, were analyzed by semi-quantitative LC-MS utilizing a QExactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as previously utilized at the UVM Proteomics Core Facility [13 (link), 15 (link), 16 ]. Spectra were searched against existing protein sequence databases compiled from UniProtKB/Swiss Prot database (http://www.uniprot.org) using the Proteome Discoverer software (version 1.4.1.14; Thermo Electron, San Jose, CA, USA). Proteins positively identified with two or more distinct peptide hits were classified according to published matrisome and proteoglycan lists [17 –19 ]. Identified proteins were compared using a Venn diagram (biovenn, http://www.biovenn.nl/index.php).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Proteome Discoverer-based Protein Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteome Discoverer (PD) software (2.1, Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to perform database searching against the database containing the Uniprot Human Proteome (ID: UP000005640, downloaded on 25 May 2016), using both Sequest and Mascot search engines. Searches were performed with the following settings: a precursor mass tolerance of 10 ppm and fragment mass tolerance of 0.02 Da. Digestion by trypsin and two missed cleavage sites were allowed. Carbamidomethyl was defined as a fixed modification and phosphorylation (serine, threonine, tyrosine) and oxidation (methionine) were dynamic modifications. The results were filtered with the following parameters: only high-confidence peptides with a global false discovery rate (FDR) < 1% based on a target–decoy approach and first ranked peptides were included in the results.
The MS/MS results (RAW data) together with the PD results were inspected in a quality control (QC) analysis using an in-house-developed QC analysis (set of functions) in R as previously described [35 (link)]. Only the samples that passed the QC were used in the biomarker discovery study. Samples that generated low quality data were re-analyzed. If for several reasons samples did not meet the requested QC parameters, for example, reproducibility of retention time and mass calibration, these samples were excluded for further data analysis steps.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Candida albicans Proteome Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thermo raw files were processed by the Proteome Discoverer (PD) software v1.4.0.288 (Thermo). Tandem mass spectra were searched against the Candida Genome Database (http://www.candidagenome.org/download/sequence/C_albicans_SC5314/Assembly22/current/C_albicans_SC5314_A22_current_orf_trans_all.fasta.gz; status: 2015/05/03) using the Sequest HT search algorithm. Mass spectra were searched for both unspecific cleavages (no enzyme) and tryptic peptides with up to 4 missed cleavages. The precursor mass tolerance was set to 10 ppm and the fragment mass tolerance to 0.02 Da. Target Decoy PSM Validator node and a reverse decoy database was used for (qvalue) validation of the peptide spectral matches (PSMs) using a strict target false discovery (FDR) rate of < 1%. Furthermore, we used the Score versus Charge State function of the Sequest engine to filter out insignificant peptide hits (xcorr of 2.0 for z=2, 2.25 for z=3, 2.5 for z=4, 2.75 for z=5, 3.0 for z=6). At least two unique peptides per protein were required for positive protein hits.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mass Spectra Analysis Pipeline

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mass spectra were filtered using Proteome Discoverer (PD) software (version 1.4.0.288, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., MA, United States). The spectrum extracted by PD was searched by Mascot (version 2.3.2, Matrix Science Ltd., London, UK). After the search, quantitative analysis was performed via the PD software according to the search results of Mascot and the spectrum after the first step of screening.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Candida albicans Proteome Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thermo raw files were processed by the Proteome Discoverer (PD) software v1.4.0.288 (Thermo). Tandem mass spectra were searched against the Candida Genome Database (http://www.candidagenome.org/download/sequence/C_albicans_SC5314/Assembly22/current/C_albicans_SC5314_A22_current_orf_trans_all.fasta.gz; status: 2015/05/03) using the Sequest HT search algorithm. Mass spectra were searched for both unspecific cleavages (no enzyme) and tryptic peptides with up to 4 missed cleavages. The precursor mass tolerance was set to 10 ppm and the fragment mass tolerance to 0.02 Da. Target Decoy PSM Validator node and a reverse decoy database was used for (qvalue) validation of the peptide spectral matches (PSMs) using a strict target false discovery (FDR) rate of < 1%. Furthermore, we used the Score versus Charge State function of the Sequest engine to filter out insignificant peptide hits (xcorr of 2.0 for z=2, 2.25 for z=3, 2.5 for z=4, 2.75 for z=5, 3.0 for z=6). At least two unique peptides per protein were required for positive protein hits.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Protein Identification Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein preparation, LC-MS/MS analysis, and a database search for the identification of proteins were essentially performed as previously described (62 (link)), except for the following changes. The LC gradient elution was as follows: 0 min at 4% eluent B, 5 min at 5% eluent B, 30 min at 8% eluent B, 60 min at 12% eluent B, 100 min at 20% eluent B, 120 min at 25% eluent B, 140 min at 35% eluent B, 150 min at 45% eluent B, 160 min at 60% eluent B, 170 to 175 min at 96% eluent B, and 175.1 to 200 min at 4% eluent B. Mass spectrometry analysis was performed on a QExactive HF instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a resolution of 120,000 FWHM for MS1 scans and 15,000 FWHM for MS2 scans. Tandem mass spectra were searched against the UniProt database (7 August 2018; https://www.uniprot.org/proteomes/UP000002530) of Neosartorya fumigata (Af293) and the human protein sequences of azurocidin, cathepsin G, and RBP7, using Proteome Discoverer (PD) software (version 2.2; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the algorithms of Sequest HT (a version of PD software [version 2.2]) and MS Amanda (version 2.0) software. Modifications were defined as dynamic Met oxidation and protein N-terminal acetylation as well as static Cys carbamidomethylation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Proteome Identification and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw files were, respectively, searched against rat and mouse protein databases (rat RefSeq database downloaded August 2015 containing 42,925 sequences, mouse RefSeq database downloaded October 2014 containing 58,513 sequences) using the SEQUEST algorithm embedded in Proteome Discoverer (PD) software (Thermo Scientific, version 1.4). Precursor mass tolerance was set as 10 ppm, and fragment mass tolerance was set as 0.02 Da. Number of maximum miss cleavage sites was set to 2. Carbamidomethylation of cysteine was set as static modification. N-terminal acetylation, methionine oxidation, as well as phosphorylation of serine, threonine, and tyrosine were included as variable modifications. False discovery rate (FDR) was calculated using Percolator. Only rank 1 and high confidence (with a target FDR q-value below 0.01) peptides were included in the final results. Proteome GO-term molecular function analysis was performed using the Automated Bioinformatics Extractor1 (ABE) (35 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!