The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Xevo g2 xs qtof mass spectrometer

Manufactured by Waters Corporation
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

The Xevo G2-XS QTOF mass spectrometer is a high-resolution, high-mass accuracy instrument designed for analytical applications. It utilizes quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) technology to perform accurate mass measurements and provide detailed structural information about analytes. The core function of the Xevo G2-XS QTOF is to enable precise identification and quantification of complex molecules in various sample types.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

123 protocols using xevo g2 xs qtof mass spectrometer

1

UPLC-HRMS Analysis of H. atra Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UPLC-HRMS analysis of the H. atra extracts was carried out according to Rivera-Mondragon et al. (2019), with modifications [54 (link)], using a XEVO-G2-XS QTOF mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) coupled with an Acquity UPLC system. The system was operated with MassLynx 4.1 software (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). An HSS T3 RP18 column (1.8 µm, 2.1 × 100 mm) (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) was used to obtain separation. The following samples were analyzed using a UPLC Acquity system coupled with a Xevo G2-XS Q-Tof mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA), including subfractions MB, MC, ME, MF, and MG, and the Me fraction and Bu fraction. A total of two isolated compounds were also analyzed by UPLC-HRMS. The mobile phases used were (A) H2O + 0.1% FA and (B) ACN + 0.1% FA, and the gradient was set as follows: 3% of B (0–1 min), 100% of B (17–19 min), and 3% of B (21–25 min). The flow rate was 0.4 mL/min. The following settings were used for the mass spectrometer: a cone gas flow of 50 L/h; a desolvation gas flow of 1000 L/h; a source temperature of 120 °C; and desolvation at 550 °C. The samples were analyzed in MSe mode, thus obtaining information from the molecular ions and mass fragmentation data simultaneously. The MS data were recorded in ESI+ and ESI- mode with an MS scan range from m/z 50 to 1500.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protein Desalting and Mass Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein desalting and mass analysis was performed by LC-MS using an M-class ACQUITY UPLC (Waters UK, Manchester, UK) interfaced to a Xevo QToF G2-XS mass spectrometer (Waters UK, Manchester, UK). Samples were diluted to 5 µM using 0.1% TFA. 1 µL of the 5 µM sample was loaded onto a MassPREP protein desalting column (Waters UK, Manchester, UK) washed with 10% solvent B in A for 5 min at 25 µL min. After valve switching, the bound protein was eluted by a gradient of 2–40% solvent B in A over 1 min at 25 µL min. The column was subsequently washed with 95% solvent B in A for 6 min before re-equilibration at 5% solvent B in A ready for the next injection. Solvent A was 0.1% formic acid in water, solvent B was 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile.
The column eluent was directed into the mass spectrometer via a Z-spray electrospray source. The MS was operated in positive TOF mode using a capillary voltage of 3.2 kV, sample cone of 20 V and source offset of 80 V. The source temperature was 100 °C and desolvation was 250 °C. Mass calibration was performed by a separate injection of [Glu]-fibrinopeptide b at a concentration of 250 fmol µL. Data processing was performed using the MassLynx v4.1 suite of software supplied with the mass spectrometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Labeling β2-Microglobulin Cysteine Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
14N-D76N-β2m Cys variants (S20C, S33C, S57C, and S88C) were thawed at RT. The samples were incubated with 20 mM DTT for 30 min at RT. DTT was then removed from solution using a 5 ml centrifugal desalting column (Zebra 7K/MWCO, 89882), which was equilibrated with 50 mM sodium phosphate and 150 mM sodium chloride, pH 7, prior to use. Eluted protein fractions were quantified and the protein concentration was adjusted to 200 μM. The sample was then mixed with 2 mM (final concentration) of MTSL (CAS: SC-208677) in 500 mM guanidine HCl. The reaction mixture was incubated for 4 h at RT and then centrifuged at 44,000g for 1 h to remove any protein aggregates. β2m-Cys-MTSL labeled variants were isolated by gel filtration (Superdex75 PG-26/600), and monomeric fractions were collected and stored at 4 °C for further use. The mass of the modified proteins was confirmed by ESI-MS recorded using a Xevo QToF G2-XS mass spectrometer (Waters UK) operated in positive ion mode. The MS spectra show complete labeling of the proteins (observed masses of D76N-β2m of 12,059.46 ± 0.28 Da, 12,059.78 ± 0.11 Da for S57C-MTSL and S88C-MTSL, respectively (expected mass of 12060 Da).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Enzymatic Activity Assay for Acyltransferases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The enzymatic activity assay was carried out in a 500 µl reaction system comprising 100 µg purified proteins, 1 mM caffeoyl-CoA or p-coumaroyl-CoA as the acyl donors, 1 mM pHPL or DHPL as the acyl receptors. The reactions were incubated at 25 °C for 60 min and terminated by adding 10 µl of 10 M acetic acid. Controls were carried out using total proteins from E. coli transformed with the empty pGEX-4T-1 vector. Reaction products were collected and analyzed using ACQUITY UPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). MS/MS data were recorded on a Xevo G2-XS Q-ToF Mass Spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) coupled to a Waters Acquity I-Class UPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). MS/MS analyses were conducted in negative-ion mode. The samples were separated on an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (1.7 μm, 100×2.1 mm) at 25°C. The mobile phase A was 0.1% (v/v) formic acid-acetonitrile. The mobile phase B was 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water. The flow rate was 0.3 mL min−1. The mobile phases changed with the following gradient: 0–6 min, 5% A and 95% B; 6–8 min, 20% A and 80% B; 8–14 min, 21% A and 79% B; 14–18 min, 95% A and 5% B. MS was analyzed using electrospray ionization (ESI) at negative ion mode. MS-MS data were analyzed using the MssLynx V4.1 software (Waters) as described previously (Pan et al., 2023 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Structural Characterization of Natural Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Melting points were obtained on a SGW X-4 micro melting point apparatus (INESA Co., Shanghai, China). Optical rotations were measured on a SGW-533 automatic polarimeter (INESA Co., Shanghai, China). The 1D and 2D NMR spectra were measured with a Bruker DRX-600 instrument (Bruker BioS-pin GmbH Company, Rheinstetten, Germany) with TMS as the internal standard. ESIMS data were recorded on an API QSTAR mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystem/MSD Sciex, Concord, Ontario, Canada); HRESIMS were recorded on a Waters Xevo G2-XS QTof mass spectrometer (USA). ECD spectra were recorded on a JASCO J-810 circular dichroism (CD) spectropolarimeter (JASCO Co., Tokyo, Japan). Column chromatography was performed on silica gel 60 (100–200 mesh, Qingdao Marine Chemical Ltd., Qingdao, China), sephadex LH-20 (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden), and Develosil ODS (50 μm, Nomura Chemical Co. Ltd., Osaka, Japan). The preparation of TLC was performed on HSGF254 plates (Jiangyou silicone Development Co., Ltd., Yantai, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Analytical Methods for Structural Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specific rotations were measured using a DIP-360 digital polarimeter (JASCO, Easton, PA, USA). Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded on a JEOL ECX 400 FT-NMR spectrometer (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at room temperature. Electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ESI-TOF-MS) experiments were performed using a Waters Xevo G2-XS Q-TOF mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Column chromatography was performed on Silica Gel 60 (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan, 230–400 mesh) and YMC ODS-A gel (YMC Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan, 50 µm). Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was performed on TLC Silica Gel 60F254 (Merck, Damstadt, Germany) and TLC Silica Gel 60 RP-18 F254S (Merck, Damstadt, Germany) plates. The spots were visualized by spraying with 10% aq. sulfuric acid followed by heating. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was performed using a UV-8020 UV-VIS detector (Tosoh Corp., Tokyo, Japan), DP-8020 pump (Tosoh Corp., Tokyo, Japan), and DP-8020 degasser (Tosoh Corp., Tokyo, Japan). An XBridge BEH C18 Column (Waters, Milford, MA, USA, 130 Å, 3.5 µm, 10 mm × 250 mm) was used for preparative purposes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

UPLC-QTOF Analysis of Complex Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An ACQUITY UPLC connected to a XEVO-G2XS QTOF mass spectrometer (Waters, Manchester, UK) equipped with an electrospray ion source was used. Liquid chromatography was performed using a Titan™ C18 UHPLC column (2.1 x 100 mm, 1.9 μm, Supelco). The column temperature was maintained at 45°C. The separation was performed at a flow rate of 0.4 mL min-1 under a gradient program in which the mobile phase consisted of (A) 0.1% formic acid (v/v) and (B) pure methanol. The gradient program was applied as follows (in % B): (t) = 0 min, 1%; t = 2.0 min, 1%; t = 8.0 min, 38%; t = 20 min, 99.5%; t = 25 min, 99.5%; t = 25.1 min, 1%; and t = 28 min, 1%, for a total analysis time of 28 minutes. The injection volume was 0.2 μL. Positive ion mode was recorded, and the instrument was operated in data-independent acquisition mode (MSE). The m/z range was 100–1700, with an acquisition rate of 0.5 sec per scan. The following instrumental parameters were used: capillary: 3.0 kV; cone: 40,000 V; desolvation temperature: 550°C; cone gas flow: 10 L h-1; desolvation gas flow: 900 L h-1. The collision energy was 20 to 60 eV for fragmentation. Leucine encephalin (molecular weight = 555.62; 200 pg μL-1 in 1:1 acetonitrile:water) was used as the lock mass for accurate mass measurements, and a 0.5 mM sodium formate solution was used for calibration. Samples were randomly analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Metabolomic profiling of bioactive extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemical diversity of the selected bioactive crude extracts was explored via an untargeted UPLC-QToF-MS/MS-based metabolomics approach. ULC-MS grade solvents were purchased from Biosolve Chimie or from LGC Standards (Wesel, Germany). LC-MS/MS analyses were performed on an Acquity UPLC I-Class system coupled to a Xevo G2-XS QToF mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA), equipped with an Acquity UPLC HSS T3 column (High Strength Silica C18, 1.8 μm, 2.1 × 100 mm, Waters) operating at 40 °C. Crude extracts were dissolved in MeOH at a concentration of 1.0 mg/mL and the injection volume was 0.3 µL. A binary mobile phase system (A: 0.1% formic acid in ultra-purified water, B: 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile) was pumped at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min by applying a linear gradient (% of A given): initial, 99%; 11.5 min, 1%; 14.5 min, 1%; washing and reconditioning of the column until 16 min. Acquisition of MS and MS/MS spectra was performed as previously described [47 (link)], despite the following modifications: spectra were recorded in positive mode and the acquisition range was set to m/z 50–1200. The capillary voltage was kept at 3 kV. Solvent (MeOH) and media controls (CAG, GYM, MB, PDA) were analyzed using the same conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS Analysis of RCOO Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS analysis was performed on a Waters Xevo G2-XS QTOF mass spectrometer (Milford, MA, USA) equipped with a UPLC system and an electrospray ionization source (ESI). The column was Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm) (Milford, MA, USA), and the temperature of the column was set at 30 °C. The mobile phases consisted of eluent A (0.1% formic acid acetonitrile solution, v/v) and eluent B (0.1% formic acid aqueous solution, v/v), and the flow rate was 0.4 mL/min. The gradient elution conditions were as follows: 0–2 min, linear gradient 86–93% A; 93% A in 2–8 min. The mass spectrometry analysis was performed using an ESI, and the accurate molecular mass was corrected by leucine enkephalin solution. The negative ion mass spectrometry scanning mode was used for detection. The scanning m/z range was 100–1200 Da, the scanning time was 0.2 s, the sprayer flow rate was 800 L/h, and the cone voltage was set to 40 V. The sample of RCOO was dissolved in methanol (through 0.22 μm microporous membrane) and analyzed by mass spectrometry. The mass spectrometry data were collected and recorded by Masslynx workstation (version 4.1, waters, Manchester, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

NMR and HRMS Characterization of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Ascend TM 600 MHz, and all samples were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide-d6. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) was recorded by an ultra-high–performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) quadrupole time-of-flight–MS system. The UPLC contained a Waters Acquity Plus system equipped with a photodiode array detector. Separation was obtained on the Waters Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.7 μm). The solvent phase for UPLC was as follows: 100% acetonitrile at a flow rate of 0.2 mL min−1. HRMS analysis was performed on the Waters Xevo G2XS QTof mass spectrometer, which was connected to the UPLC system via an electrospray ionization interface. Mass accuracy and reproducibility were maintained by a Lockspray.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!