The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Vectra polaris

Manufactured by Akoya Biosciences
Sourced in United States, New Zealand, Japan

The Vectra Polaris is a high-content, multispectral imaging system designed for comprehensive spatial analysis of tissue samples. The system provides simultaneous detection and quantification of multiple biomarkers within a single tissue section, enabling the study of complex biological processes and cellular interactions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

57 protocols using vectra polaris

1

Multiplex Tissue Imaging on Vectra Polaris

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Image acquisition was performed using the Vectra Polaris imaging platform (Vectra Polaris, Akoya Biosciences). Representative regions highlighted in this paper were chosen from an initial whole slide scan, and images were acquired at 40x resolution using FITC, Cy3, Texas Red, Cy5 and Opal 780 filters. Images were spectrally separated with a synthetic algorithm in inForm version 2.4.8 (Akoya Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of Tumor-Resident Memory T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The staining procedure, including target antigens, antibody clones, dilutions, and antigen retrieval conditions is reported in Supplementary Methods. Image acquisition was performed using the Vectra Polaris multispectral imaging platform (Vectra Polaris, Akoya Biosciences). Of note, CD103 was chosen to identify TRM cells in vivo due to its well-defined expression in TRM populations, and the lack of an experimentally-validated antibody against ZNF683 for IF. Areas with non-tumor or residual normal tissue were excluded from the analysis. Representative regions of interest were selected under pathologist supervision, 6 fields of view (FOV) were acquired at 20x resolution. Once the FOV were spectrally unmixed, cell identification was performed using supervised machine learning algorithms within Inform 2.4 (Akoya, Supplementary Methods). Thresholds for "positive" staining and the accuracy of phenotypic algorithms were optimized and confirmed under pathologist supervision for each case. Quantification of cell populations per mm2 are reported in Data File S6.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiplex IF Imaging and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Multiplex IF images were acquired on the Vectra® Polaris automated quantitative pathology imaging system (Akoya Biosciences, Marlborough, MA, USA), as described.13 (link),14 (link) Quantification of the immune cells was carried out using the inForm active learning phenotyping algorithm by assigning the different cell phenotypes across several images representative of the whole scan. InForm software was trained to recognize cell phenotypes according to panel 1 and panel 2. This algorithm was then applied on the whole scan by batch to quantify all the different cell types. A homemade R-script was used to retrieve all combined phenotype cells and scoring in an output excel file.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Automated Quantification of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Evaluation of NETs was performed using an Automated Quantitative Pathology Imaging System (Vectra Polaris, Akoya Biosciences). Tissue imaging and spectral unmixing were performed using inForm software (version 2.4.8, Akoya Biosciences). Image analysis was then performed using the open-source digital pathology software QuPath version 0.2.3 and ImageJ Software, an open-source Java-based image processing software. Measurement workflow and scoring have been previously described (42 (link)). In short, neutrophils were identified by the costaining with CD15 and MPO. NETs were detected based on the costaining with CD15, MPO, and H3Cit. An ImageJ software plugin was developed and validated to accurately calculate the percentage area of neutrophils and NETs for each TMA spot (42 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multiplex Immunofluorescence Analysis of FFPE Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Multispectral analysis of FFPE tissue utilised the MOTiF™ PD-1/PD-L1 kit (Akoya Biosciences, cat# OP-000001). Staining with Leica BOND RX (Leica Biosystems) and imaging with Vectra® Polaris™ (Akoya Biosciences) was performed at The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (WEHI) Histology core facility as per kit manufacturer instructions. Briefly, tissue was stained through cycles of incubation with primary antibody, anti-IgG polymer HRP and covalent labelling with Opal TSA fluorophores, followed by heat induced epitope retrieval to remove bound antibodies prior to subsequent antibody cycles. Target markers included CD8 (Opal 480), PD-L1 (Opal 520), PD-1 (Opal 620), FoxP3 (Opal 570), CD68 (Opal 780, PanCK (Opal 690) and spectral DAPI DNA stain. Whole slide multispectral scanning was performed on the Vectra® Polaris™ using automatically adjusted exposure settings. Image tiles were spectrally unmixed in InForm® (Akoya Biosciences), then restitched in QuPath software (34 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Neutrophil Infiltration in Mouse Ears

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice ear cryosections (6 µm) were fixed in acetone for 10 min at RT and air-dried. Then, cryosections were incubated with 400x diluted Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated rat-anti-mouse Ly-6G (GR-1 staining, eBioscience) for 1 hour at RT. After washing in PBS, nuclei were stained using DAPI (Invitrogen) at 1 µg/ml for 5 minutes at RT and embedded with fluorescence mounting medium. Tile scanning to obtain an image of the whole ear was performed using the Vectra® Polaris™ (Akoya Biosciences) microscope with the following settings: DAPI MSI 0.43ms, FITC 81.70ms and a 20 times magnification. GR-1 staining of cryosections was analyzed with ImageJ/Fiji software. The total area (µm2) of mice ears and the area of the specific GR-1 staining (µm2) was measured. Quantification was calculated as the GR-1 area (µm2) divided by the total area (µm2). The following formula was used to determine the GR-1/total area ratio:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multiplexed IHC Analysis of COVID-19 Lung Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Multiplexed IHC was performed with a Leica Bond Rx on 5 μm-thick formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded lung tissue sections from individuals with and without COVID-19. Consecutive staining was performed by heat-induced antigen retrieval followed by incubation with primary antibody (anti-C5aR1 clone S5/1 at 1 μg/mL). The signal was amplified and detected with Opal™ polymer horseradish peroxidase and Opal 520 (Akoya Biosciences). The sections were then subjected to heat-induced antibody stripping and incubated with the next antibody (anti-CD163 clone EDHu-1 at 1 μg/mL, detected with Opal 620, and, finally, anti-CD68 clone KP1 at 0.1 μg/mL, detected with Opal 690) and spectral DAPI. All Opal reagents were used at a dilution of 1/150. Slides were finally mounted in ProLong Diamond antifade mounting medium (Thermo Fisher) and scanned with a Vectra Polaris (Akoya Biosciences). Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides were scanned with a Nanozoomer (Hamamatsu). After spectral deconvolution and whole-slide reconstruction of the multiplexed IHC stained sections, digital pathology methods were used to determine the density of positive cells. All analyses were performed with Halo (Indica Labs) and R.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Multiplex Immunofluorescence for Tumor Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative multiplex immunofluorescence (qmIF) was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections of pre-treatment tumor samples to measure biomolecular targets in defined tissue compartments. Validated and standardized protocols for qmIF staining and signal measurement were carried out as previously described (13 (link)-15 (link)). Primary unconjugated antibodies against CD8 (BioLegend, C8/144b Mouse IgG1) and TCF1 (Cell Signaling, C63D9 Rabbit IgG) were coincubated with tissue and then sequentially detected with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated species-specific secondary antibodies (Goat Anti-Mouse IgG1 HRP, Abcam, ab97240; and EnVision+ Single Reagent HRP Rabbit, Agilent/Dako, K400311-2; respectively). Tyramide Signal Amplification was performed with HRP activators Cy3 Tyramide (Perkin Elmer, SAT704A001KT) for CD8, and Cy5 tyramide (Perkin Elmer, SAT705A001KT) for TCF1. Tumor epithelium was identified with a cocktail of monoclonal antibodies to pan-cytokeratins (AE1/AE3, ThermoFisher; 53-9003-82) directly conjugated to AlexaFluor 488. DAPI was used to identify cell nuclei. Coverslips were mounted with Prolong Gold (Molecular Probes), and whole slide imaging was performed on a Vectra Polaris (Akoya) using the 20X objective.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Muscle Fiber Typing Using Immunofluorescence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Muscle fiber types were assessed on both operated and contralateral MDN. After electrophysiological assessment, the entire MDN was carefully dissected and removed. Afterward, muscles were embedded in optimal cutting temperature compound (Tissue-Tek) using liquid-nitrogen-cooled isopentane and stored at −80°C for 24 h. Cross sections 10 µm thick of the embedded muscles were then obtained. A modified version of a previously described immunofluorescent protocol was used (Bergmeister et al., 2016 (link), 2019 (link)). First, Wheat germ agglutinin conjugated Alexa Fluor 594 (1:250) was applied for 10 min to stain the muscle fiber membrane. Primary antibodies diluted in 0.1 m PBS with 10% goat serum against myosis heavy chain (MHC)-I (BA-F8; 1:50), MHC-IIa (SC-71; 1:600), and MHC-IIb (BF-F3; 1:100) were used and applied for 60 min (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank). Afterward, the secondary antibodies against Alexa Fluor 633 immunoglobulin G2b (IgG2b; 1:250), Alexa Fluor 488 IgG1 (1:250), and Alexa Fluor 555 IgM (1:250) were applied for 60 min (Life Technologies). Entire cross sections of the muscle were acquired using a whole-slide scanner (Vectra Polaris, Akoya Biosciences) and subsequently analyzed using the Halo imaging analysis platform version 3.2.1851.421 (Indica Labs) by one independent investigator (M.L.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Multiplex IHC Biomarker Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On sequential TMA sections, each biomarker was stained by either chromogenic IHC for PD-L1, CK, CD68, or CD8, or the optimised mIF panel for PD-L1, CK, CD68, CD8, and DAPI. Optimised retrieval methods and staining conditions are detailed in Supplementary Table S1, and were as described by [4 (link),17 (link)]. CK was applied to serial Section 1; PD-L1 to serial Section 2; mIF panel for PD-L1, CK, CD68, CD8, and DAPI to serial Section 3; CD68 to serial Section 4; and CD8 to serial Section 5. DAB IHC slides were scanned at ×20 on an Aperio AT2 digital scanner (Leica Biosystems, Milton Keynes, UK) and mIF slides were scanned on an Akoya Vectra Polaris (Akoya Biosciences, Marlborough, MA, USA) at ×20 using the MOTiF™ protocol. Images were automatically stored on a secure networked server. Comparable quantitation of single channel mIF with the DAB IHC on sequential sections was undertaken by DIA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!