The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using deep purple total protein stain

1

2-DE Gel Proteomic Analysis of E. ictaluri

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Preparative 2-DE gels were prepared exactly as described above, except that the IPG strips were loaded with 500 μg of protein. Resultant gels were stained using Deep Purple Total Protein Stain (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Briefly, gels were fixed overnight in 15% v/v ethanol and 1% w/v citric acid followed by staining for 1 h in 1:200 parts of Deep Purple and 100 mM sodium borate solution at pH 10.5. Gels were then washed for 30 min with 15% v/v ethanol in water, acidified for 30 min using a solution containing 15% v/v ethanol and 1% w/v citric acid. Stained gels were scanned using a Typhoon 9410 imager using a 532 nm laser and a 610 nm BP30 emission filter. In-gel trypsin digestion and MALDI peptide mass fingerprinting (PMF) was performed as previously described [46 (link)] with slight modifications (mass tolerance value was 150 ppm and E. ictaluri protein database was used).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Protein Extraction and Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Semi-preparative gels, containing 400 ug of total protein extract per strip, were loaded; electrophoretic conditions were the same as for 2-D DIGE, except that gels were stained with a protein fluorescent stain (Deep Purple Total Protein Stain, GE-Healthcare). Image acquisition was performed using the EDI imager. Protein identification was carried out as described previously, and MS data are reported in Supporting Information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Proteomics Analysis of Atrial Fibrillation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gel images were acquired on a Typhoon 9400 scanner (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) and analyzed using DeCyder software (version 6.0; GE Healthcare Life Sciences) as previously described (26 (link),27 (link)). Briefly, Cy2-, Cy3- and Cy5-labeled images of each gel were scanned with excitation/emission wavelengths of 488/520, 532/580 and 633/670 nm, respectively. Following CyDye labeling, signals were imaged and the gels were stained using Deep Purple total protein stain (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) according to standard protocols and scanned with excitation/emission wavelengths of 532/560 nm. The 2-D DIGE gel images were subsequently analyzed with DeCyder software. Protein expression patterns for SR-RAA were compared with AF-RAA, and SR-LAA were compared with AF-LAA. Ratios of proteins that increased or decreased >1.5-fold (t-test, P<0.05) were considered significant changes (9 (link)). The corresponding protein spots were also selected in the stained preparative gel for spot picking.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Deglycosylation of Purified PRRSV

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In non-reducing conditions, 2 µg of purified PRRSV was incubated with 100~500 units of peptide-N-glycosidase F (PNGase F, New England Biolabs, Ipswich MA) in 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.5, or 100~400 units of endoglycosidase Hf (Endo Hf, New England Biolabs) in 50 mM sodium citrate, pH 5.5, at 37°C for 1 h. The mixture of virus and endoglycosidase was added to gel loading buffer with 5% β-mercaptoethanol, boiled for 10 min and electrophoresed in 10–20% gradient Tris-HCl Ready Gels (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules CA). For PNGase F samples, CandyCane Glycoprotein Molecular Weight Standards (Invitrogen) were used to estimate protein size and protein bands were visualized with RubyProtein Gel Stain (Invitrogen). For Endo Hf samples, Kaleidoscope Prestained Standards (Bio-Rad) were used to estimate protein size and protein bands were visualized with Deep Purple Total Protein Stain (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). Finally, proteins were analyzed in EpiChemi3 Darkroom (UVP, Upland CA) using LabWorks 4.5 software (UVP).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Detailed Immunoblotting and ChIP Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-RACK1 (sc-17754), anti-pan actin (sc-1616), anti-GAPDH (sc-25778) antibodies and the horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Anti-phospho-CREB (#9191), and anti-CREB (#9121) antibodies were from Cell Signaling. Anti-β-actin antibody (#A5316, clone AC-74), forskolin, (FSK) cytochalasin D and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails 1 and 2 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The protease inhibitor mixture was purchased from Roche Applied Science. Nuclear proteins were isolated using the NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents from Thermo Scientific. Trypsin, and the reverse transcription system and 2X PCR Master Mix were purchased from Promega and SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix was from Applied Biosystem. Primers for PCR were synthesized by Sigma-Genosys. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay kit was from Millipore. Amylose resin was from New England BioLabs. Deep Purple™ Total Protein Stain and Enhanced Chemiluminescence (ECL) were from GE Healthcare. Non-muscle purified actin >99% purity (#APHL99) was purchased from Cytoskeleton. NuPAGE® Bis-Tris pre-casted gels and recombinant protein G-agarose were from Invitrogen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Semipreparative Gel Protein Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Semipreparative gels, containing 400 µg of total protein extract per strip, were loaded; electrophoretic conditions were the same as for 2D-DIGE, except that gels were stained with a protein fluorescent stain (Deep Purple Total Protein Stain, GE Healthcare). Image acquisition was performed using the Typhoon 9200 laser scanner. Proteins were identified by PMF utilizing a MALDI-ToF mass spectrometer (Ultraflex III ToF/ToF; Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany), as previously described [26] . In particular, the search was performed by correlation of uninterpreted spectra to Homo sapiens entries in NCBInr database 20100918 (11833178 sequences; 4040378175 residues). Protein identification methods are provided in a MIAPE-MS compliant form [21] in Supporting Information Table 1S. (For further information about protein identification, see Supporting Information Table 2S and Supporting Information Figure 1S).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!